is it just me?? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


charsan -> is it just me?? (6/14/2006 5:38:31 PM)

please, am i the only one on this site who finds it VERY SEXIST for posting only nude and compromising photos of women, yet the photos of men are censored?  i have a sub friend who told me that his picture of him in his swimming trunks was refused (and i saw it, not even revealing), yet i'll have sub women's pix pop up with their boobs, asses, pussies and everything else displayed (which i just don't EVEN appreciate).  why the double standard?  why can't dicks etc. be shown but we can have all kinds of pix of women's parts?  it doesn't seem fair... anyone know where i can go to complain?  thanks!  Mistress C




OedipusRexIt -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 5:41:08 PM)

I agree. 

It's a reflection of the sexism in our society, as well as a reflection of the marketing department's keen insight into the fact that men are extremely visually-oriented, especially when it comes to sex.  Women somewhat less so, according to studies.

Personally, I think it's stupid, but that's just me.




juliaoceania -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 5:42:14 PM)

For one, genitalia of BOTH sexes is banned. I am glad of it. There are other sites that show dick pics,... I am embarassed to have those pages open. I have never feared someone would look at CM over my shoulder. That being said I do not know why men cannot be bare chested.... someone else will have to answer that.




playfulotter -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 5:46:41 PM)

Men are the only ones who need to pay for it i have found...i didn't read what everyone else wrote but it is a fact of life and i think we have to live with it...it is good and bad!




KatyLied -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 6:25:43 PM)

A lot depends on if it is a "primary" picture.  Primary pictures have different requirements than additional pictures.  Primary pics can't zone in on specific parts of the body.  But sometimes a pic that is rejected for "primary" will make the cut as an "additional".




Lashra -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 6:27:33 PM)

The more naked men the better I say. Im tired of looking at eye candy women, give me some eye candy men for awhile. I'm not sexist, Im an equal opportunity perverette. [:D]

~Lashra




MsIncognito -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 7:49:06 PM)

Actually, just a day or two ago when I went to the main page I was 'welcomed' to the site by an advertisement with an extreme close up of a woman's genitals. I don't think they're banned when they're bringing in the $$$$$

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

For one, genitalia of BOTH sexes is banned. I am glad of it. There are other sites that show dick pics,... I am embarassed to have those pages open. I have never feared someone would look at CM over my shoulder. That being said I do not know why men cannot be bare chested.... someone else will have to answer that.




juliaoceania -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 7:53:02 PM)

I havent seen that.




Arpig -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 7:56:09 PM)

I envy you, since if this is what you get worked up about, you must live a fdamned fine life...a damned boring one, but damned fine.




NastyDaddy -> RE: is it just me?? (6/14/2006 8:21:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: charsan
please, am i the only one on this site who finds it VERY SEXIST for posting only nude and compromising photos of women, yet the photos of men are censored?  i have a sub friend who told me that his picture of him in his swimming trunks was refused (and i saw it, not even revealing), yet i'll have sub women's pix pop up with their boobs, asses, pussies and everything else displayed (which i just don't EVEN appreciate).  why the double standard?  why can't dicks etc. be shown but we can have all kinds of pix of women's parts?  it doesn't seem fair... anyone know where i can go to complain?  thanks!  Mistress C


Not so sure it's any real double standard, or sexist for that matter either.

It may have something to do with women's nature of being so picky and needing things just so so to be right...

... as compared to a man's more primal reaction, a naked ass is a naked ass and we will look at a naked ass as long as we possibly can, no questions asked, no complaints... the only thing that will stop us from looking at a naked ass is yup, another naked ass!

Please explain this:  boobs, asses, pussies and everything else  Is there really an anything else? Can I see what one looks like?





NakedOnMyChain -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:14:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NastyDaddy

Please explain this:  boobs, asses, pussies and everything else  Is there really an anything else? Can I see what one looks like?


Oh, there's always something else.  Wait... I'm thinking of that really tall blonde prostitute with an adam's apple.  Nevermind.




Moloch -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:25:35 AM)

LMAO!!!  




mnottertail -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:28:24 AM)

fast reply.........

Doooooode!

If you are advocating dick wigglers instead of the tittie and ass pictures that I slobber over all day long, you can just get yourself a goddamn stuntman!!!!




Bearlee -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:34:32 AM)

I recently tried to make a picture of just my legs in nearly thigh-high boots (the top of the pics was me from the butt down...primly covered in a short skirt).  I just really liked the boot pic.  But...it was rejected; I was floored.

When I wrote to ask WHY...it was because 'close-ups' of parts of the body are not allowed as primary pics here.  They said I could use it here...just not as my 'primary' picture.

I can't remember if I went back and posted it... I wonder how many people even KNOW profiles can include multiple pictures?   LOL




NakedOnMyChain -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:35:25 AM)

"Please excuse me while I whip this out."

O=========================3

Long and skinny apparently, with tiny tiny testes.  Now no more complaining about lack of dick.  You all got to see mine.




OedipusRexIt -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:36:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

fast reply.........

Doooooode!

If you are advocating dick wigglers instead of the tittie and ass pictures that I slobber over all day long, you can just get yourself a goddamn stuntman!!!!


OK, you totally lost me with this one....  Who's advocating that, and why would they need a stuntman?

How 'bout a site that caters to all needs....  Just a thought.




...plus, I always do all my own stunts.  Tom Cruise eat your heart out.




Moloch -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:37:29 AM)

Long and skinny eh?  does your last name end with a "ski"?




Arpig -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:46:33 AM)

quote:

How 'bout a site that caters to all needs


Needs?????
Since when have nekid pics been a need?

Personally I think its a little strange, here you are complaining there aren't more naked male pictures, and yet there are countless threads complaining about being sent cock shots......which is it?




Wolf1020 -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:48:20 AM)

I personally like nekkid pictures of women....never been to fond of nekkid pics of men

So see, I don't feel the problem [:D]




HisTicia -> RE: is it just me?? (6/15/2006 8:54:53 AM)

fast reply:
 
I have found that it can't be the main pic..but it can be one of the additional pics.  I just saw a man not that long ago..on the main page half naked..so still not sure why your friends was rejected.

edited..cause I had a brain fart




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125