RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor?

RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

subspaceseven -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 6:40:26 AM)
The same could be said for those that attacked Obama saying he was a lousy US Senator for Illinois but never lived here.... Know anyone like that?????

DomKen -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 6:54:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: Aylee quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie quote: ORIGINAL: subspaceseven issuing accurate birth certificates for the children of married same-sex couples. Something there reads just plain wrong[8\|] It makes no sense to me either. Shouldn't the birth certificate have the actual biological parents listed. I can just imagine the anger from future genealogists if it was done any other way. MA is one of many states where the spouse of the mother is legally the parent no matter what the biological origin of the child. Therefore refusing to let the legal parent's name appear on the BC will cause all kinds of legal issues in the here nd now and does nothing to change the struggles of future genealogists. So even in the case of a sperm donor? Well, that doesn't seem right either. My personal opinion is that the birth certificate should reflect the biological mother and father (if known.) And if that interferes with inheritance of property from the legal father?

Aylee -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:00:47 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen And if that interferes with inheritance of property from the legal father? I think that there are other avenues for that. County records for marriage and adoption, for one. I was mostly thinking of medical backgrounds. Especially with the coming of electronic records. Not having good information on your family medical history has the potential for a lot of problems.

crazyml -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:04:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SternSkipper So when were you in Mass? 2000-2002 (Celluci and Swift).

subspaceseven -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:06:44 AM)
The people that I know who have adopted a child have complete medical histories of both parents, as much as can be found out. They do not have the names of the parents unless the parents want that information made available

jezzabelle -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:07:09 AM)
I live in MA and no, I don't think he was a good Governor, best thing he did was leave!

jezzabelle -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:10:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Fightdirecto Willard "Vietnam? Heck no - I'm heading to France" Romney was elected to a 4-year term as Governor of Massachusetts. The final 2 years of his term as Governor he spent traveling the other 49 states campaigning for the Republican Presidential nomination by verbally trashing the state of Massachusetts and all of it's residents. Yep, and left us with his Lieutenant Governor in charge who was another very poor choice.

crazyml -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:24:18 AM)
Thanks jezzabelle, and all the others. Nice to have an impression reset once in a while!

LookieNoNookie -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:29:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subspaceseven The same could be said for those that attacked Obama saying he was a lousy US Senator for Illinois but never lived here.... Know anyone like that????? Nope.

subspaceseven -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 3:49:15 PM)
At the moment willard is on the stump bragging about how well he worked with the Dem control in MA. But if you look past the BS and look at the record, in 4 years willard issued over 800 vetoes, and the Dems overrode the vetoes over 700 times. Sounds like what the head of the education board said, with willard it's his way and no other. Which is great if you own the business and it's you money.

SternSkipper -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:42:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: crazyml quote: ORIGINAL: SternSkipper So when were you in Mass? 2000-2002 (Celluci and Swift). That explains things just fine to me thanks. I was pretty sure the assessment wasn't reflective of a Romney era real property owner. I think if you had, your opinion might be a little different. Just sayin.

SternSkipper -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/27/2012 7:47:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jezzabelle quote: ORIGINAL: Fightdirecto Willard "Vietnam? Heck no - I'm heading to France" Romney wuas elected to a 4-year term as Governor of Massachusetts. The final 2 years of his term as Governor he spent traveling the other 49 states campaigning for the Republican Presidential nomination by verbally trashing the state of Massachusetts and all of it's residents. Yep, and left us with his Lieutenant Governor in charge who was another very poor choice. You can still get arrested for shouting "Kerry Heatley" in a crowded theater.

popeye1250 -> RE: So.. Was Romney a good governor? (10/29/2012 11:50:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: subspaceseven The same could be said for those that attacked Obama saying he was a lousy US Senator for Illinois but never lived here.... Know anyone like that????? Seven, yes but Obama (was) a lousey U.S. Senator. How many votes did he miss? I was in Mass (Woburn) for a few years of Romney's tour and I think he was "o.k." Nothing special. But, I think people in public office are the ,..."hired help" and should just,..."keep the factory running" I don't care or want to know what they ..."think." They're not "leaders" they're there to do a job then gtfo! God I can't stand that word,..."leader." Especially when it's applied to politicians. Funny, I don't know anyone, man or woman who expresses a "need" to be lead by someone in the District of Columbia sitting behind a desk who they've never met and probably never will meet! My message to Washington...... "Just keep the factory running and keep your, ..."hopes", "dreams" and "Visions" to yourself please!" I think there should only be a "state of the union" address once every four years. I think the president should only even (be) on t.v. maybe twice a year. I don't care if they're married, if they have kids, hobbies, nothing personal. I just don't think we need to know any of that. I think we should make it a law that anyone working in Washington wear gray suits only. Men and women. I think we'd be MUCH better off hiring a Manager and having a president who's a figurehead, much like the monarchy in England.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125