NeedToUseYou -> RE: Profile Contradictions (6/16/2006 12:27:46 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei quote:
ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou Sex has nothing at all to do with my politics, I get annoyed when anyone in politics gets on that soap box. It has to do with the politics of many... like when sex results in pregnancy and abortion; or when the President (Clinton) is having it; where pornography is involved; when it's between two members of the same sex, or when sodomy is involved Well, the abortion debate is really the only issue in your list, that oddly is mainly divided between the camps. And even then it's not a 100%. I'm pro-life personally, but I don't think there is a way to force that view on others, aside from extreme measures that would probably do more bad than good. So, I have to tolerate abortion though it is not a virtuous act in my book in the vast majority of cases. As far clinton getting a blowjob, well, shame on the republicans that made it a huge issue, and shame on Clinton and the democratics for condoning his lies under oath. That would have been done if George got caught with his pecker hanging out as well. So, it's not really a conservative/liberal thing, it's a politician seeing a weakness in a perceived enemy thing. And Tipper(spelling) Gore was the head of the PMRC, remember in the 80's that group that wanted to censor Ozzy, Prince,Twisted Sister, Motley Crue, etc... because it was destroying the children!!!(At the time that would have been me, LOL). So, not all liberals are open minded either. But you'd think that was the case, from the way some look at it. I actually remember watching the whole debate, quite funny. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipper_Gore If a politicians main issue is that of gay marriage, pornography, sodomy,censorship, etc.... Well, he will never get my vote for the simple reason, that he/she obviously isn't thinking in the same vein that I am. So, to me it is a non-factor, and believe to alot of people such things are non-factors. As personally I don't care if gays marry, I don't care if someone participates in sodomy, I don't care if a president gets a blowjob, I don't care if someone is a chronic porn addict, and whacks off 10 times a day. And I really don't see how abortion can be eliminated completely, so to me limiting abortion to some rational degree makes sense to me. Some permanent common ground needs to be reached there. Though I doubt it as bad politicians love dividing issues. Actually my favorite politician in my short memory was ross perot, I loved his graphs and no nonsense style of speaking. I think he would of been the first conservative president this country has seen in decades. He addressed, true government concerns, and didn't pander to flash point issues. But anyway, that's how I see it, and most of the self-identified conservatives, I know identify themselves pretty closely in those bounds. It's only the talking heads, and crazies on either side that are focused on what should be relatively small issues, and turn them into election making issues. That is wrong, and it's not just conservatives, it's both sides. I know democrats that would say they were liberal that hate gays by the way, I know racist ones to, I know ones that aren't racist or homophobic to. So, these false ideas that ones political designation is a indicator of ones views on sex, racism, tolerance of gays, simply isn't true at all. At least in this area. Maybe I live in a bubble? The only indicator I've seen that would define a political difference is generally conservatives are for smaller government, and liberals are for more social programs which results in larger government. All the other differences seem to stem from that basic difference in philosphy. Except for the false differences that don't actually manifest themselves in the people I've talked to.
|
|
|
|