BenevolentM
Posts: 3394
Joined: 11/15/2006 Status: offline
|
subrob1967 wrote in response to Politesub53 the following. quote:
ORIGINAL: subrob1967 Again, your statement implies I made a claim that the judge was independent.. I didn't, and you're obviously confused about your own state of mind. Sadly, I try to be impartial. Sadly, this implies that I will likely manage to piss everyone off by days end. Sadly, much as the liberals often engage in fantasy, the conservatives also have their foibles. You rightly pointed this out subrob1967. Notice that my vocabulary is excellent. It seems to me that as painful as it may be for me to admit it, Politesub53 has the upper hand since presumably the goal, despite differences in opinion, is the truth. As I pointed out earlier this is partially excusable when the truth is already known. For argument sake, say this is so. What the conservatives and liberals have done is made war with the other. With war comes the fog of war. Each side choices to become the opposite of the other. In so doing both sides deny both what is false, but also what is true. To bend the truth by choice is dangerously close to blasphemy, however. The liberals are elitist pricks who think they are objective when they are not. Why become like the liberals? Why wallow in the mud like a pig? If you stand for truth, then stand for it. In my opinion you subrob1967 pushed the envelope in your zeal too far and need to back down and apologize for such an insipid denial. You won little in this gambit. At least walk away from it with dignity, closer to God. Humble before God, humble before He who is Truth.
|