RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


thompsonx -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 9:16:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


Has the current president refused a fully equiped hospital ship from cuba as the previous administration did after katrina?


I googled "Cuban Hospital ship" and could find no evidence that such a seagoing center of wellness exists.
It seems illogical that a country without a blue water navy or much in the way of recent agression toward anyone else would go to the expense of having one.
Could you show us?



I am sorry you found yourself incapable of using the google function.
http://www.fpif.org/articles/bush_administration_refuses_cuban_offer_of_medical_assistance_following_katrina

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_3584.shtml

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9311876/ns/us_news-katrina_the_long_road_back/t/katrina-aid-cuba-no-thanks-says-us/




Hillwilliam -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 9:25:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


Has the current president refused a fully equiped hospital ship from cuba as the previous administration did after katrina?


I googled "Cuban Hospital ship" and could find no evidence that such a seagoing center of wellness exists.
It seems illogical that a country without a blue water navy or much in the way of recent agression toward anyone else would go to the expense of having one.
Could you show us?



I am sorry you found yourself incapable of using the google function.
http://www.fpif.org/articles/bush_administration_refuses_cuban_offer_of_medical_assistance_following_katrina

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_3584.shtml

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9311876/ns/us_news-katrina_the_long_road_back/t/katrina-aid-cuba-no-thanks-says-us/

I'm sorry that you don't know the differrence between a "fully equipped hospital ship" and:

(from your links) "Cuban president Fidel Castro assembled 1586 doctors with backpacks filled with medical equipment at the Havana Convention Center on September 4, announcing their readiness to leave at a moment's notice. Gulfstream Airways, a regional carrier based in Florida , offered to fly them into the affected region free of charge."

"One of the first countries to offer aid, Cuba offered to send 1,586 doctors and 26 tons of medicine" (no hosp ship mentioned)
Fail




thompsonx -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 10:01:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


Has the current president refused a fully equiped hospital ship from cuba as the previous administration did after katrina?


I googled "Cuban Hospital ship" and could find no evidence that such a seagoing center of wellness exists.
It seems illogical that a country without a blue water navy or much in the way of recent agression toward anyone else would go to the expense of having one.
Could you show us?



I am sorry you found yourself incapable of using the google function.
http://www.fpif.org/articles/bush_administration_refuses_cuban_offer_of_medical_assistance_following_katrina

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_3584.shtml

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9311876/ns/us_news-katrina_the_long_road_back/t/katrina-aid-cuba-no-thanks-says-us/

I'm sorry that you don't know the differrence between a "fully equipped hospital ship" and:

(from your links) "Cuban president Fidel Castro assembled 1586 doctors with backpacks filled with medical equipment at the Havana Convention Center on September 4, announcing their readiness to leave at a moment's notice. Gulfstream Airways, a regional carrier based in Florida , offered to fly them into the affected region free of charge."

"One of the first countries to offer aid, Cuba offered to send 1,586 doctors and 26 tons of medicine" (no hosp ship mentioned)
Fail


Perhaps those 1586 doctors were going to swim with the 26 tons of medical supplies...but then perhaps you prefer to pick flyshit out of pepper?
Would you be more comfortable wth the term air ships filled with doctors and medicqal supplies as opposed to "hospital ship".
It seems you are carping about a distintion with no difference....
Or do you have a fucking point at all other than to see your moronic opinions in print?
My question was, and it was not rhetorial,has the current president followed in the asinine footsteeps of his predicessors or has he been more pragmatic? I ask because I do not know...Do you have an answer or is your post simply a little dick waving?




Hillwilliam -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 10:44:53 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx






You made a claim. It was false. End of story.




tj444 -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 11:29:22 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Wood burning stoves or fireplaces are likely highly impractical in so densely populated an urban area. Getting and maintaining a supply of wood? Just as bad as gasoline supply I would guess. Maybe worse because of the bulk.

much worse imo, wood stoves/fireplaces are dangerous.. there is a good reason why some cities have banned them.. i rented in a place that had one and if the wind was blowing the wrong way the smoke wouldnt vent outside, it came inside.. there is a reason why people have smoke detectors.. but most peoples reaction to the wood stove setting off the detector is to disconnect the detector.. No way in hell I would ever have a wood burning anything.. and I dont buy any claims that new models are better, safer, cleaner, etc.. I dont even want to live near anyone that has one, studies show that smoke can get inside your neighbors homes cuz the particles are so small... just sayin'

JMO




thompsonx -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 1:09:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Perhaps those 1586 doctors were going to swim with the 26 tons of medical supplies...but then perhaps you prefer to pick flyshit out of pepper?
Would you be more comfortable wth the term air ships filled with doctors and medicqal supplies as opposed to "hospital ship".
It seems you are carping about a distintion with no difference....
Or do you have a fucking point at all other than to see your moronic opinions in print?
My question was, and it was not rhetorial,has the current president followed in the asinine footsteeps of his predicessors or has he been more pragmatic? I ask because I do not know...Do you have an answer or is your post simply a little dick waving?







You made a claim. It was false. End of story.


Clearly a case of a little dick waving. Your semantic arguement shows the depth of your intellectual capacity. If it makes your dick stiff that they did not come on a hospital ship then now is the time for the white chicken to crow.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 1:11:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx



Your semantic arguement


Said by the king of the nitpicking semantic argument.

[sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif]

You made a claim, it was a lie.




thompsonx -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 1:48:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx



Your semantic arguement


Said by the king of the nitpicking semantic argument.

[sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif][sm=rofl.gif]

You made a claim, it was a lie.


Ships filled with doctors and hospital supplies or a hospital ship...the little white chicken continues to crow.
It really is fun to entice you into this sort of thing...it clearly shows the depth of your intellectual ability.
Is it a lie that the u.s. refused ships filled with doctors and hopital supplies from cuba in the aftermath of katrina?
Just for the semantically challenged those would be air ships as in airplanes.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 5:45:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx



This is a picture of a "fully equipped hospital ship" as you stated that Cuba offered to the US\


[image]local://upfiles/664494/DEDC0E70C58241AEB169410B811A2726.jpg[/image]




Hillwilliam -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 5:52:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx



This is a picture of a doctor with a backpack. Cuba was offering 1500 odd of these to us and the air transport was going to be supplied by Gulfstream Airways out of Florida.
Even you should be able to tell the difference.
Face it. You lied and got caught and now you're twisting in the wind.

[image]local://upfiles/664494/D3723D7DDF56405AA5F929865A2BF045.jpg[/image]




marie2 -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 7:55:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Brainonhold


This sort of explains things. You really ought to get out and see the world beyond New Jersey. I was in New Jersey, traveling through, just last Wednesday, on my ride back from Louisiana. Did New Jersey get knocked around. Yeah. But the mess in New Jersey, with all due respect, is quite honestly, "Child's Play," compared to some of the "friggin national disaster areas" in other parts of the country.

Ever been to a place called Waveland, Mississippi ? I know it's hard to find. It isn't on a lot of maps. Well, it use to be on every map, but in 2005, it was pretty much wiped off the map. It was hit with a 26 foot tidal wave on top of high tide which averages 2.2 feet. Altogether, a 28.2 foot storm surge. The term that was used to describe the area within 3 miles of the Gulf was "obliterated." Literally, 100% of the buildings, including the Town Hall and Public Library, and 100% of the homes in Waveland within 3 miles of the Gulf of Mexico, were GONE. Just GONE. The houses weren't "knocked down." They were knocked down and sucked away into the Gulf of Mexico by the receding tide. Even the damn asphalt was ripped off the ground. That's right, the damn streets were even gone ! The rest of the town of Waveland, that was just flooded.

Yeah. Waveland had a population of 6,674 for the 2000 census. The town of Waveland took their own count in July 2002 and came up with 6,737. They don't have any really hard numbers for the town for the 2010 census. They think the population was about 3,000 in 2010. Nobody is really sure how many people live there now. You could probably build a house there pretty cheap. Heck, you could save a ton of money if you bought a lot that already has a foundation, but just had it's house ripped off it back in 2005.

You don't have a clue !

Yeah. Then there was the town of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Bay St. Louis had a population of 8,209 for the 2000 census. (8,143 in July 2002). Well, the storm surge there was only 30.3 feet. Hey .... here's a link to a FEMA photograph of the "Main Drag" in and out of town back in October 2005. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FEMA_-_16964_-_Photograph_by_John_Fleck_taken_on_10-04-2005_in_Mississippi.jpg Have any roads that look like that in New Jersey ?

You don't have a clue !

The Lower 9th Ward of New Orleans, on average, is about 20 feet below sea level. That's not a big deal usually, except when the levee failed during a Hurricane back in 2005. Heck, most of the houses in the Lower 9th were single story, so the roof of most homes were only submerged 10 feet underwater. Heck, the folks who had scuba gear, well, they could eat three square meals a day, sitting right at their kitchen tables 20 feet under water.

Nobody's car in the Lower 9th Ward got completely submerged under water. Those folks all drive around in used Double-Decker Buses that use to be part of the transit system in London, England. Well, truth be told, the first floor of the buses were flooded, and the second floor was a little damp. But if you stood on the roof of the bus, you were only in water waist deep.

You don't have a clue !

Mount St. Helens, out in Washington State; back in 1980, heck, the deadliest and most economically destructive volcanic event in the history of the United States. Fifty-seven people were killed; 250 homes, 47 bridges, 15 miles of railways, and 185 miles of highway were destroyed. The volcanic eruption was so violent, reducing the elevation of the mountain's summit from 9,677 ft to 8,365 ft. Poof ! 1,322 feet of mountain gone ! The eruption only completely flattened every tree, bush and blade of grass for 230 square miles. Only 3.9 million cubic yards of mud flowed 17 miles into the Columbia River. It was no big deal .... really.

The Weyerhaeuser people only lost about 60,000 acres of trees out there. Nothing compared to New Jersey I'm sure. And they weren't able to recover a lot of lumber from the trees that were knocked down. It was only enough to build 85,000 three bedroom homes. A drop in the bucket I'd imagine compared to all the catastrophic damage in New Jersey. Then, the Weyerhaeuser people had to replant they 60,000 acres they lost. Heck, that only took 18.4 million trees.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, 1945, somewhere between 150,000 and 250,000 were killed instantly. Nobody really knows for sure because there were so many people that were just vaporized by the explosion. 100% of all buildings in both cities were reduced to rubble, instantly. Hiroshima had a population of 419,000 in 1942. After the "big bang" the population dropped to about 137,000. Today, the population is only something close to 1.2 million people.

Bad things happen to good people everyday for all kinds of reasons. It's very regrettable honestly. It would be terrific if we lived in a perfect world where no bad stuff ever happened, but that isn't reality. But the folks who make out best after these "friggin disasters" (to coin a phrase), in the long run are the folks who roll up their sleeves and get to work at improving their lives, instead of telling everyone "how bad it sucks."

So really. Quit your crying and go find a decent broom. You've got a lot of sweeping that needs to done down there in New Jersey. And learn some lessons while you're cleaning up the mess. As much as you hate to admit it, maybe you should consider living on higher ground. As much as you hate to admit it, maybe you should consider a little preparedness. Consider just for a minute, this "friggin disaster" provides you folks in New Jersey the opportunity of a lifetime. Let's face it, you now have the opportunity to show the rest of us jerks in the other 49 states what jerks we really are. You can just put that State completely back together without our help. And then, then you'll have all the bragging rights.

Come to think of it, it would be really nice to hear the folks from New Jersey bragging about what great work they did, rather than pissing and moaning about what jerks everyone is.



Batterings from Mother Nature to Hiroshima? You forgot to mention the holocaust too. You're slipping way off track here and comparing apples to oranges. No one has said that this has been the worst tragedy known to mankind.

The topic was about personal responsibility for having prepared for storm Sandy. And a bunch of self-righteous blowhards like yourself sat in judgement, with insane claims that people didn't prepare, they're not self-reliant, they were wasting gas watching TV, and their demise and the losses they suffered are their own fault. And those of us who lived through it, have the facts, and the visuals of the actual extent of the damage, tried to explain to you that there is only so much you can prepare for some of the horrors that some people have experienced in this tragedy. No one was looking for your pity, but the outright blame and bitterness towards the victims is really offensive to those of us who actually know what happened here.

And no, not everyone from the other 49 states are "jerks"; just the uninformed ones like yourself who sit in judgement standing on your "high ground", blathering your pomp and circumstance.

Your "arguments" and robotic mantras have gotten boring. I'm done with you.




marie2 -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 8:06:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

I'm right there with you marie. 


Ha! Did you and I just agree on something? This is front page news!!




vincentML -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/6/2012 8:53:52 PM)

quote:

The topic was about personal responsibility for having prepared for storm Sandy. And a bunch of self-righteous blowhards like yourself sat in judgement, with insane claims that people didn't prepare, they're not self-reliant, they were wasting gas watching TV, and their demise and the losses they suffered are their own fault.

Bullshit. The OP was only about people standing in gas lines on day 3, failing to top off their cars and exposing the flaws in using gasoline generators. NOWHERE in the OP did I say their demise and losses were their own fault. You mischaracterize the OP to serve your own arrogant, delusional moral superiority. Basically, your comments are a fucking lie. Nothing but fucking scurillous slander. I NEVER blamed the victims for their deaths and property losses. Yours are the scumiest lies I have ever seen on these forums. Using death and destruction to serve your own fucked up ego is shameful shit.




thompsonx -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/7/2012 6:19:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx



This is a picture of a doctor with a backpack. Cuba was offering 1500 odd of these to us and the air transport was going to be supplied by Gulfstream Airways out of Florida.
Even you should be able to tell the difference.
Face it. You lied and got caught and now you're twisting in the wind.

[image]local://upfiles/664494/D3723D7DDF56405AA5F929865A2BF045.jpg[/image]


Are there 1500+ doctors on your boat?
Have you a dictionary? Perhaps it's use might diabuse you of your ignorance concerning the meaning of the word word lie?
My post was about the u.s. refusing aid from cuba for the victims of kartina. Do you deny that that happened?
You wish to argue the delivery method and not the substance of my post. I agree that the dellivery method was not a hospital ship... my point was and is that the u.s. refused the help of 1500+ doctors and 26 tons of medical supplies.




fucktoyprincess -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/7/2012 6:53:33 AM)

Again the OP asks for our thoughts and experiences. And many of us who are in the area affected by Sandy have responded, but somehow our thoughts and experiences are considered invalid by the OP and a few others who are sitting comfortably in their homes in an entirely different part of the country. How very interesting . And how telling.

Those of you who really think you could survive a massive physical disaster through survivalist skills ought to take the time to read The Road by Cormac McCarthy. When doomsday comes, even the best survivalist is going to be pushed to the brink. So continue to dream on about your post-apocolyptic survival skills that are so very vastly superior to others. In a true disaster, most of you won't be significantly better off. It's human folly to think we can outlive anything. We are not immortal.

I think people do what is reasonable based on the probabilities. To do anything more is actually inefficient and wasteful. I find it surprising that the right wingers are actually encouraging inefficient and wasteful behavior. Again, how very telling.

Anyone who thinks people in New York City are not self-reliant and tough knows nothing about this city. We survived 9/11, we will survive Sandy, and screw those who think otherwise. This is one of the most competitive, hard-driven, self-reliant places in the county. We live in a constant threat of global terrorism, in case some of you didn't realize. To call people in this region oblivious is really pretty ridiculous. How many of you live in parts of the country where since 9/11 you have to worry about a terrorist act striking your home every single day? We are prepared as well as people can be prepared. But life must also go on.

Those of you with survivalist instincts - go move to the mountain country, high ground, off-grid, and live out your lives with your various survivalist techniques. If you are so confident you can go it alone, then by all means do. Why are you relying on society at all, if you don't believe in the value of community? The rest of us are quite content to go on living our lives and contributing to our societies in meaningful ways. Life is not defined purely by how long one is able to live. The measure of one's life is something quite different. I would rather live a robust, compassionate, helpful life that is short than squeezing out every last breath in a selfish, intolerant way. Hoarding a bunch of supplies for personal use when others are suffering is not necessarily an ideal. [sm=2cents.gif]




vincentML -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/7/2012 7:30:04 AM)

quote:

Those of you who really think you could survive a massive physical disaster through survivalist skills ought to take the time to read The Road by Cormac McCarthy. When doomsday comes, even the best survivalist is going to be pushed to the brink. So continue to dream on about your post-apocolyptic survival skills that are so very vastly superior to others. In a true disaster, most of you won't be significantly better off. It's human folly to think we can outlive anything. We are not immortal.

But obviously the OP was about people who did survive. There they were standing for hours in lines. Big as Life. They put themselves into an uncomfortable position by the technique they used, however. The OP is about consequences AFTER the storm. It should not take a genius to realize fuel will be used up and additional fuel hard to come by. You did not make that mistake as others did, especially in the suburbs, and you got through just fine apparently.

Good luck to you tonight, btw.




LaTigresse -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/7/2012 7:39:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: marie2


quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

I'm right there with you marie. 


Ha! Did you and I just agree on something? This is front page news!!


Marie2, I am glad to see you on here. You and Aileen were two of the first people that came to mind.

I wish I had more to offer all of you.




Baroana -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/7/2012 9:17:27 AM)

Come on, guys. Take to heart the advice of our wiser colleagues here. People just ought not to live anywhere near waterways (you know, the life blood of civilization? )

If you do, then ya gets what's comin to ya.




LaTigresse -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/7/2012 9:30:53 AM)

I believe the concept of 'wiser' is more in the eyes of the readers, rather than the writers.[;)]




Hillwilliam -> RE: Individual Responsibilities for Storm Preparedness (11/7/2012 10:04:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Has the current president refused a fully equiped hospital ship from cuba as the previous administration did after katrina?



Keep twisting in the wind, moving the goalposts and playing stupid assed semantics games.

You posted utter asswipe.

You got called on it.

Put on your big boy pants and deal with it.




Page: <<   < prev  11 12 [13] 14 15   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625