mnottertail
Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004 Status: offline
|
Here let me help you out. Intellectual dishonesty is the advocacy of a position known to be false. An argument which is misused to advance an agenda or to reinforce one's deeply held beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence contrary. The terms intellectually dishonest and intellectual dishonesty are often used as rhetorical devices in a debate; the label invariably frames an opponent in a negative light. It is a round about way to say "you're lying". If you as the rest of the world, will accept this as a working definition of intellectual dishonesty, then I think we can advance your understanding. You see, the lie was the 'undetermined' when it did not say any such a thing, when called upon it, you could not quote it, but did rather pathetically throw up an empty screen as if it was proof when indeed you are advocating what you know to be false. See, where we are at? Or is your misapprehension in the relative positions in this assigned to 'you' and 'me' I am me. You are you. (that should go without saying, but so that we understand each other correctly............) This definition has been neccesarily and sufficiently met by you. Therefore you are inte......c'mon, know you can do it.......finish the sentence........its English, you've done this........ Wilb, come clean.
< Message edited by mnottertail -- 11/2/2012 3:00:56 PM >
_____________________________
Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30
|