RE: This is rich (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:07:05 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEmJ-VWPDM4&feature=fvwrel

It's the Tao of the thing, innit?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zb4JY2mr-_Y

And real...........




Moonhead -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:08:12 PM)

Are you calling me a wanker?
[sm=jaw.gif]




mnottertail -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:11:59 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vHvzybkqfo


'ere's yer bloody wanker, mate:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okqEVeNqBhc




Moonhead -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:16:30 PM)

That Vapours number is alleged to be a metaphor for beating off, Ron: he squints when he comes, dig?

But these are the punky wankers you need:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EEPvXlTUnU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmGvG7hB4OQ




slvemike4u -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:20:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

One of the other recidivist sockpuppet trolls we have hereabouts has been through at least three states in his posting history, hasn't he?
[;)]

I dunno.. I dont really keep track of anyone that closely.. and I naively take people at their word (until proven otherwise).. which is probably the reason I will never find a boyfriend on this site.. lol

You can always take me on my word tj,I will never lie to you ;-)




mnottertail -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:22:40 PM)

EMI has that blocked.

OO's this then?  Oi?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3tFZxhVaXo
Topical, since its all about this pissup we call american politics.  




Moonhead -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:24:09 PM)

That's blocked as well.
Which Buzzcocks one aren't they letting out?




slvemike4u -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:25:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doyqWt9Ed1k


Its not your grandfather's Mersey beat innit?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFaPJs43eI4

Nice Ron,see how even back than the musicians had all the ladies hanging around them ,lol




mnottertail -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:25:27 PM)

Blimey, guv...we've set back relations two centuries between the countries.





Moonhead -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:28:26 PM)

Not until I produce this one, we ain't:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mANx3L-N0yU




mnottertail -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 12:33:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Not until I produce this one, we ain't:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mANx3L-N0yU


OO-ER!!!!!  Love that one, never heard it or seen it (using my american and euponically damaging seen just for you.  The block to you was the speech before; and tubthumping.





LookieNoNookie -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 4:48:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

�You�re laughing, but who wants a president who will knowingly, repeatedly tell you something he knows is not true?� Clinton asked, after discounting a claim in a recent Romney ad that the Obama administration’s auto bailout hurt American workers.

“When I was a kid, if I got my hand caught in the cookie jar, where it wasn’t supposed to be, I turned red in my face, and I took my hand out of the cookie jar,” Clinton added.
(bolding added)

[8|]

Ahh, Your hand? Really?!?!




The funny thing is....had Romney been in control of the auto bail out, he would have forced them into bankruptcy, then, he's said, he would have had the feds guarantee the loans (not actually make them), the interest rate would have been about 5 points above market but....there would have been new shares to sell to the public instead of 55% of the shares being handed off as a payback for votes to the unions and in the end....GM and others would have done far better.

In both cases, jobs would have been lost (and were).

In both cases, sales would have dropped for a time (and did).

And in both cases, had there been a market for the products these companies produced, sales would have exploded.....and they did.

The difference would have been....shareholders, investors who took risk, would have been on the hook.

Now, it's just you and me....and GM is behind by something akin to 20 billion...that you're on the hook for.

Gotta love the Obama way eh?

Bankruptcy by any other name except....YOU get to pay.....not investors.

Love it.

Enjoy the next 4 if Obama gets back in.

You get to pay even more :)




tj444 -> RE: This is rich (11/6/2012 8:11:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
One of the other recidivist sockpuppet trolls we have hereabouts has been through at least three states in his posting history, hasn't he?
[;)]

I dunno.. I dont really keep track of anyone that closely.. and I naively take people at their word (until proven otherwise).. which is probably the reason I will never find a boyfriend on this site.. lol

You can always take me on my word tj,I will never lie to you ;-)

awww... I know I could take you on your word, Mike.. [:)]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875