RE: Eye Candy (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message

jlf1961 -> RE: Eye Candy (4/3/2013 4:19:15 PM)

Here are some older ladies, sadly no red heads

[image]local://upfiles/622970/7BEBB20B80B847E9B723A8F744709EB9.jpg[/image]



LanceHughes -> RE: Eye Candy (4/3/2013 8:35:07 PM)

quote:


But I'm about to post a pic anyways:

[image]local://upfiles/1028154/BA80A68EF204460099970069BB48D527.jpg[/image]


I'll wager a "Bare Chest Calendar" Contest for charity..... You see, there's exactly 12 of them. And Firemen to boot. (see what I did there? Firemen... boot?) The white guy in front row - furthest (our) right has a fireman tattoo on the inside of his left arm. NOT that I study such pics carefully.





sexyred1 -> RE: Eye Candy (4/3/2013 8:45:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Thaz

Jeff, you and the local kink scene do my heart good. Redheads are most certainly in fashion and I've seen more nekkid Redheads both in the flesh and here than I have in years. Play on. Play on.


In my experience, being a redhead has never been out of fashion.

One interesting thing about this thread is that the photos being posted where they call them "older women" are not my idea of older women. They look no older than 35, which is not old.

I don't like the underage photos that one person keeps posting, but the male photos...all swoon worthy.



jlf1961 -> RE: Eye Candy (4/3/2013 9:22:30 PM)

All the photos I have been posting are from sites with all the proper legal disclaimers on age.



Lucifyre -> RE: Eye Candy (4/3/2013 9:37:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

All the photos I have been posting are from sites with all the proper legal disclaimers on age.



lol just because there's a disclaimer doesn't mean it's accurate.

And I agree...stop with the little girls for crap sake...I have KIDS that are around those girls ages and it's just full of squick!

Luci



jlf1961 -> RE: Eye Candy (4/3/2013 10:39:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucifyre


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

All the photos I have been posting are from sites with all the proper legal disclaimers on age.



lol just because there's a disclaimer doesn't mean it's accurate.

And I agree...stop with the little girls for crap sake...I have KIDS that are around those girls ages and it's just full of squick!

Luci


I am trying to find older models, trust me.

It seems the "barely legal" genre is the largest growing market for "amateur" photography, followed by MILFS, big chested (most bigger than Pamala Anderson), lingerie is also popular, and I have found a lot of "less is more" sites by amateurs that follow the old school tease shots.

As for the "barely legal" photo sites, the ones I follow on tumblr actually do not call themselves that, the blogs were "small breasted" which I find attractive, primarily a c cup. After reading the post that I replied to, I unfollowed a number of blogs that were the cause of the problems with the pictures.



MadamAsianDom -> RE: Eye Candy (4/3/2013 11:03:55 PM)

Brandon Carter

[image]local://upfiles/1217791/B979BA72D0B04483840910C639B9E946.jpg[/image]



needlesandpins -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 2:12:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucifyre


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

All the photos I have been posting are from sites with all the proper legal disclaimers on age.



lol just because there's a disclaimer doesn't mean it's accurate.

And I agree...stop with the little girls for crap sake...I have KIDS that are around those girls ages and it's just full of squick!

Luci


I am trying to find older models, trust me.

It seems the "barely legal" genre is the largest growing market for "amateur" photography, followed by MILFS, big chested (most bigger than Pamala Anderson), lingerie is also popular, and I have found a lot of "less is more" sites by amateurs that follow the old school tease shots.

As for the "barely legal" photo sites, the ones I follow on tumblr actually do not call themselves that, the blogs were "small breasted" which I find attractive, primarily a c cup. After reading the post that I replied to, I unfollowed a number of blogs that were the cause of the problems with the pictures.


sorry Jeff but what you are saying there is just like justification crap to me. the girls you constantly post pics of are barely out of high school and have no place on this site. girls lie about their age, and where there is money to be made people don't give a shit.

now consider this......BARELY LEGAL......why is there a market for that? because guys want it. not barely legal, but girls that are, or most certainly look underage. as a mother that worries me greatly.

as for your so called older women.....i'm 41 soon and your 'older' 20-early 30 somethings are no where near fricking 'older' anything other than the context of being older than the little girls you keep posting.

so now can you stop with the 'barely kiddie porn' photos please?

needles



needlesandpins -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 2:17:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

[image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/3022_187587778056869_1796996276_n.png[/image]

Loving everything but the undies


now that guy is more my type than the uber ripped guys. i agree that the pants arn't the greatest though.

needles



jlf1961 -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 2:58:18 AM)

this better?

[image]local://upfiles/622970/D37F71557A8C4AA2857FF53D1FA89B8F.jpg[/image]



jlf1961 -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 6:11:20 AM)

I will not be posting any photograph of a nude or topless female that the age may be questioned, even if there is a photographers copy right on the image.

The reason is two fold, one not to offend, and two, after researching the laws on nude photography in the US, I have come away more confused than I was when I started.

While photographing a minor nude in a non sexual setting is legal, it is controversial, I point to the pictures of Brooke Shield nude at ten and her portrayal of a child prostitute at the age of twelve. Granted, Pretty Baby would probably not get made today, the book Age of Innocence by David Hamilton features underage nude girls and is available in all states. The Age of Innocence [Unknown format] [Hardcover] David Hamilton (Photographer)

It boils down to photography of underage girls is not illegal but is controversial, and considering the niche barely legal models, could be avoided all together.

Finally, in my research, I have come across court rulings that are as varied as the pictures themselves concerning what is explicit display of genitalia and what isnt.

Anyway, I apologize for the offending photos and they will stop.



VideoAdminChi -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 6:19:11 AM)

quote:

so now can you stop with the 'barely kiddie porn' photos please?


This thread is locked for review.




VideoAdminChi -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 10:30:12 AM)

I have removed pictures that I or other posters found questionable. If we missed any, please put in a ticket.

As a reminder, NO pictures of minors may be posted anywhere in the discussion boards, regardless of state of dress.



Hillwilliam -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 10:47:15 AM)

for those complaining about pictures of ladies who are "too young even though they're of legal age"


[image]local://upfiles/664494/EBACC5E0680C4191A70F8E7C23A0A0AC.jpg[/image]



Lucylastic -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 11:30:52 AM)

dunno what you mean there Hill,but eh whatever
[image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/529237_625636587462001_896572906_n.jpg[/image]



tiggerspoohbear -> RE: Eye Candy (4/4/2013 4:17:19 PM)

They don't have to be completely nude to set for a nice shot. Not as far as I'm concerned, more can be better than less sometimes. [;)]

[image]local://upfiles/1028154/60C58FFBF58A4D0E9067245A020B0CDD.jpg[/image]



Lucylastic -> RE: Eye Candy (4/6/2013 12:08:56 PM)

I have thousands of nudes of both sets of genitalia, but I prefer the covered ones...more erotic.
Mr Michael Stokes, Does AWESOME pHOTOGRAPHY.... This is Americo Rocco
[image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/539199_188458301303150_925614114_n.jpg[/image]



MissToYouRedux -> RE: Eye Candy (4/6/2013 12:19:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

[image]https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/3022_187587778056869_1796996276_n.png[/image]

Loving everything but the undies


now that guy is more my type than the uber ripped guys. i agree that the pants arn't the greatest though.

needles


Oooh! Lots of hair to pull all over! My type as well. [;)]



tiggerspoohbear -> RE: Eye Candy (4/6/2013 1:03:40 PM)

Lucy, I'd rather leave to the imagination too. If I'm going to see naked I better be able to touch da naked!! [:D]

[image]local://upfiles/1028154/EE48BFF44E7B42E190D9893E14353E6F.jpg[/image]



dreamofthemoon -> RE: Eye Candy (4/7/2013 8:56:10 PM)

Totally agree with you, tigger! [:D]

[img]http://adultsonlyblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/photo-Ass-Hot-890681348.jpg[/img]



Page: <<   < prev  41 42 [43] 44 45   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625