|
subspaceseven -> RE: benghazi (11/16/2012 11:09:29 AM)
|
Why don't you hold that same critical eye to the gulf war, you know the one where Condi Rice could not explain the meaning of the title of a security briefing.."Bin ladin to attack USA" You know the one she testified in front of congress under oath she could not grasp the meaning of the briefing by it's title, so chose not to read it.
And Her with more than 2 college degrees...makes one wonder just how shitty her education was
Of course even today even GOP'er King is backing off
Q: Did he say why it was taken out of the talking points that [the attack] was Al Qaeda affiliated?
KING: He didn’t know.
Q: He didn’t know? What do you mean he didn’t know?
KING: They were not involved — it was done, the process was completed and they said, “Ok go with those talking points.” Again it’s interagency — I got the impression that 7, 8, 9 different agencies.
Q: Did he give you the impression that he was upset it was taken out?
KING: No.
Q: You said the CIA said “OK” to the revised report
KING: No, well, they said in that, after it goes through the process, they OK’d it to go. Yeah, they said “Okay for it to go.”
Today’s comments by King towards the intelligence community’s assessments also mark a sharp departure from his previous accusations that Rice should have known sooner that the intelligence that was presented to her was incorrect. Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) have both also recently said that Rice should “have known better” than to make the statements she did during her interviews.
|
|
|
|
