RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 8:18:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine
He's bright and motivated and sitting around waiting for the million to one chance of a real apprenticeship, while our factories are hiring engineers from Poland because they're too tight to train their own people.


That just shows how low our own educational system is in the UK.

Some would argue that paying for training is a heavy investment in one person that might not pay off if they leave after training and go work for a rival company.
But surely, isn't that the chance a business has to take? If it's a decent company, the trainee wouldn't want to leave anyway.

They get the Polish guys because they are already trained and can jump in the deep end and hit the floor running - and also (usually) for a lot lower salary.
But who trained those Polish people?
Poland's educational system and their work strategy - that's who.
This something we need to learn in the UK - invest in people and training.




JeffBC -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 11:06:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
You don't need odd-ball subjects like History or Political Science if you are training to be a mechanic or a plumber or brick-layer.

No, you are absolutely correct. But you sure as hell DO need them if you are training to become a voter in a democratic system don't you think? If we manage to shake off the yoke of the rich this go around I've often thought that the best bulkwark to at least slow the tide the next time would be solidly reworking our educational system and ensuring a real, factual knowledge of actual history and actual political science (not the made up crap they teach now).




Moonhead -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 11:10:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine
He's bright and motivated and sitting around waiting for the million to one chance of a real apprenticeship, while our factories are hiring engineers from Poland because they're too tight to train their own people.


That just shows how low our own educational system is in the UK.

Some would argue that paying for training is a heavy investment in one person that might not pay off if they leave after training and go work for a rival company.
But surely, isn't that the chance a business has to take? If it's a decent company, the trainee wouldn't want to leave anyway.

They get the Polish guys because they are already trained and can jump in the deep end and hit the floor running - and also (usually) for a lot lower salary.
But who trained those Polish people?
Poland's educational system and their work strategy - that's who.
This something we need to learn in the UK - invest in people and training.


There's a pretty obvious corollary to all that (which is worth bearing in mind whenever chavs start rioting as an excuse to loot the local TK Maxx):
If society can't be arsed investing in people in order to make them functional members of society, then it has a real fucking cheek expecting them to act as if they are when they've very blatantly been given the cold shoulder and written off as a worthless waste of time and effort.




Zonie63 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 11:55:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine
He's bright and motivated and sitting around waiting for the million to one chance of a real apprenticeship, while our factories are hiring engineers from Poland because they're too tight to train their own people.


That just shows how low our own educational system is in the UK.

Some would argue that paying for training is a heavy investment in one person that might not pay off if they leave after training and go work for a rival company.
But surely, isn't that the chance a business has to take? If it's a decent company, the trainee wouldn't want to leave anyway.

They get the Polish guys because they are already trained and can jump in the deep end and hit the floor running - and also (usually) for a lot lower salary.
But who trained those Polish people?
Poland's educational system and their work strategy - that's who.
This something we need to learn in the UK - invest in people and training.



I think that's something we need to learn in the U.S. as well. I was just commenting in another thread that businesses expect applicants to have a ready-made set of skills, but are complaining that there aren't enough applicants to meet their requirements.

I think the educational system could definitely be improved. There has been quite a bit more public attention on wanting to improve math and science education in the U.S., as we've been lagging behind other industrialized nations. (Although that doesn't tell the whole story, since that's taking the U.S. as a whole, when there are some districts/schools which are excellent while others are failing miserably.) Of course, the schools can only do so much, since they have to play the hand they're dealt.

Perhaps it might also have to do with the philosophy of education itself. Does it prepare young people with the necessary skill sets to compete in the 21st century? Our society has tended towards pragmatism and very goal-oriented, whereas education seems more process-oriented. Our educational system is geared more towards the process of getting a well-rounded education and not so much on specific career goals. There's also been a great deal of attention placed on standardized tests, so schools are under pressure to turn in high test scores - but that doesn't necessarily translate into good paying jobs for graduates.

My impression is that schools in other countries tend to be a bit tougher than we are in the U.S. Maybe they have stricter discipline, more rigid academic requirements. Many years ago, I was reading about a school in Russia holding an open house, which all parents were required to attend. Those parents whose kids had poor grades were bawled out in front of all the other parents and students there. They don't put up with any guff. I think schools in China and Japan are equally tough.

But also, in those cultures, teachers, as an occupation, are treated with much more respect than in the U.S. That may also have something to do with it. It may not necessarily have to do with pay (although that's part of it), but people also like to be respected and treated well in their job. There are other intangibles which come with job satisfaction, not just pay.





kalikshama -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 4:09:26 PM)

quote:

Believe me, colleges have absolutely dumbed down. Master and I constantly have this conversation. He asks me how my college classes are going and I complain about how boring they are because it feels like I'm back in middle school.


What's your college? I found the quality of teaching varied wildly from UMass - Smith College - STCC, with UMass being consistently excellent and the community college being quite inconsistent.




kalikshama -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 4:17:21 PM)

quote:

My youngest son is in the same boat - although he has now left school because they can't teach him what he needs to learn and he really doesn't have enough smarts to go to college or Uni.


I don't know how it works in the UK but in my state if the public high school can't teach someone that system has to pay for a private school that can. (They deny it a time or two but with persistence you can squeeze out the financing.)




kalikshama -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 4:20:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

So basically, in the US we pay 20x what we ought to for executives and CEO's and pay something like 1/3 of what we ought to for laborers.


2 million USD is what the CEO of Statoil makes in total, counting bonuses, stock and so forth.

Statoil runs the national oil industry, in practice, accounting for 30% of the GDP.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


Exxon Mobil Corp. CEO Rex W. Tillerson ranked at the top of the category with $21 million in total direct compensation [fiscal 2010].




thompsonx -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 4:21:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine
He's bright and motivated and sitting around waiting for the million to one chance of a real apprenticeship, while our factories are hiring engineers from Poland because they're too tight to train their own people.


That just shows how low our own educational system is in the UK.

Some would argue that paying for training is a heavy investment in one person that might not pay off if they leave after training and go work for a rival company.
But surely, isn't that the chance a business has to take? If it's a decent company, the trainee wouldn't want to leave anyway.

They get the Polish guys because they are already trained and can jump in the deep end and hit the floor running - and also (usually) for a lot lower salary.
But who trained those Polish people?
Poland's educational system and their work strategy - that's who.
This something we need to learn in the UK - invest in people and training.


Why do you think the berlin was was built?




Politesub53 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 4:31:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine
He's bright and motivated and sitting around waiting for the million to one chance of a real apprenticeship, while our factories are hiring engineers from Poland because they're too tight to train their own people.


That just shows how low our own educational system is in the UK.

Some would argue that paying for training is a heavy investment in one person that might not pay off if they leave after training and go work for a rival company.
But surely, isn't that the chance a business has to take? If it's a decent company, the trainee wouldn't want to leave anyway.

They get the Polish guys because they are already trained and can jump in the deep end and hit the floor running - and also (usually) for a lot lower salary.
But who trained those Polish people?
Poland's educational system and their work strategy - that's who.
This something we need to learn in the UK - invest in people and training.




The bolded part just shows your ignorance on the issue. The UK is actually high up in the latest tables produced for Pearson.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20498356

Firms long since stopped taking on apprentices, that isnt down to the government but down to the companies involved.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 4:48:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

quote:

My youngest son is in the same boat - although he has now left school because they can't teach him what he needs to learn and he really doesn't have enough smarts to go to college or Uni.


I don't know how it works in the UK but in my state if the public high school can't teach someone that system has to pay for a private school that can. (They deny it a time or two but with persistence you can squeeze out the financing.)

I think you grabbed the wrong end of the stick. lol.

In the UK, once you reach school-leaving age, you can leave the education system completely.
In a lot of cases, that means aged 16 or about to attain the age of 16, by the time of the end of the school year. So in essence, at aged 15½, you are able to leave school at the end of the current half-term period.

If you aren't old enough to leave school, you are either left struggling or you have to fight like blazes to get into a school that caters for special needs - and that's like searching for hen's teeth!

In my son's case, he'd done his exams that he was able to and was looking at doing 6th form further education in subjects that were more potentially trade-oriented than purely educational. He wanted to do metalwork or woodwork or electronics or other such 'useful' subjects that would help him find a job and a career rather than higher levels of subjects like English or maths which he honestly couldn't do.
There just weren't any such subjects at his academy and where those subjects were being taught at other schools there wasn't any available places for him - so he left.





freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 4:59:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
No, you are absolutely correct. But you sure as hell DO need them if you are training to become a voter in a democratic system don't you think? If we manage to shake off the yoke of the rich this go around I've often thought that the best bulkwark to at least slow the tide the next time would be solidly reworking our educational system and ensuring a real, factual knowledge of actual history and actual political science (not the made up crap they teach now).


I don't agree at all.
Unless you are persuing a political career, you sure as hell don't need Political Science (I don't think that's even a subject over here) or History to be able to cast a vote or even be involved in any particular political party.

I am able to choose whatever political party I fancy by whatever they show on the TV and whatever I choose to believe in. I don't need to know their past history or the history of any polical party whatsoever when I make my casting vote at the ballot box.

And the history of any party is very apt to change in their goals and manifesto depending on who is the elected leader of that party. A very good example of that is the current Labour party is nothing like what it was when under Tony Blair. Much the same as the Conservative Party under David Cameron is nothing remotely like that of the Thatcher era.





freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/27/2012 5:13:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

quote:

ORIGINAL: leonine
He's bright and motivated and sitting around waiting for the million to one chance of a real apprenticeship, while our factories are hiring engineers from Poland because they're too tight to train their own people.


That just shows how low our own educational system is in the UK.

Some would argue that paying for training is a heavy investment in one person that might not pay off if they leave after training and go work for a rival company.
But surely, isn't that the chance a business has to take? If it's a decent company, the trainee wouldn't want to leave anyway.

They get the Polish guys because they are already trained and can jump in the deep end and hit the floor running - and also (usually) for a lot lower salary.
But who trained those Polish people?
Poland's educational system and their work strategy - that's who.
This something we need to learn in the UK - invest in people and training.




The bolded part just shows your ignorance on the issue. The UK is actually high up in the latest tables produced for Pearson.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20498356

Firms long since stopped taking on apprentices, that isnt down to the government but down to the companies involved.


I don't give a flying fuck what Pearson says.
I'm using my own personal experience of the difference between what *I* was taught at school and what my kids were being taught at school - they were 5-6 years behind the subject matter by direct comparison.

And why do you think sooo many kids got A's and A*'s these past few years?? Its because the frigging teaching is aimed at getting them through the exam and not teaching the whole subject or in as much depth as they used to.
Those rankings are based on graduation ratings and UK kids are definitely not so smart as those of yester-year. More kids have graduated because the exams and subject matter are a whole heap easier - hence greater numbers of pass marks. Why do you think they had to invent the A* to distinguish those with just an A?? It's not because the kids are smarter, it's because the subjects and the exams for current 15-16 year olds are not harder than when I sat the 11-plus at aged 10!!
Despite the bleatings of those kids at school - its far easier than when I was at school. And the proof of that is the myriad of complaints by companies and universities that modern kids just don't cut the mustard with their 'high' pass marks these days.
And if you followed the news you will have heard that teachers and professors have acknowledged that exams have indeed gotten a lot easier in the last decade.
Why do you think there was all the hue-and-cry when the exam boards re-graded a lot of student's exam results and many were down-graded?? Because the exam boards recognised that the exam papers were too leniently marked.


As for companies not taking on apprentices any more, don't you find it rather odd that a time-long tradition, centuries old, has pretty much universally stopped in recent years - across the board??

If it were a few companies, I could concur with that view. But it's not.
In my dad's day, an apprenticeship was not only desirable, they were also (relatively speaking) plentiful and in many cases son followed father as a birthright in many trades. That is no longer true these days.
It's every man jack for himself.




Politesub53 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/28/2012 4:38:41 AM)

quote:

I don't give a flying fuck what Pearson says.
I'm using my own personal experience of the difference between what *I* was taught at school and what my kids were being taught at school - they were 5-6 years behind the subject matter by direct comparison.


And there is your problem, everyone experiences are different.




Moonhead -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/28/2012 4:43:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
If you aren't old enough to leave school, you are either left struggling or you have to fight like blazes to get into a school that caters for special needs - and that's like searching for hen's teeth!

Another of Blair's daft ideas. One of his big things was doing away with special needs schools and steering kids with learning difficulties back into mainstream education, which has obviously worked brilliantly...




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/28/2012 6:27:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

I don't give a flying fuck what Pearson says.
I'm using my own personal experience of the difference between what *I* was taught at school and what my kids were being taught at school - they were 5-6 years behind the subject matter by direct comparison.


And there is your problem, everyone experiences are different.

I think a direct comparison of education in my day and just 1 generation later, in the same area, is a perfectly valid comparison to make.
My school hours were longer, had fewer and shorter breaks, and didn't have a multitude of days off for 'teacher training'.
Every subject was covered over a hugely wider area and was much more in-depth.

Read the rest of my post regarding the exams and results.

It's not just my own experience - the numbers are fake because the exams and subject matter are shit-loads easier.
This has been acknowledged by the teachers and the exam boards - it's not a myth.
Easier lessons and easier exams make for more 'passes'.

That's why we are where we are in the global tables.
It's basically fudged results brought about by easier exams.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/28/2012 6:37:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
If you aren't old enough to leave school, you are either left struggling or you have to fight like blazes to get into a school that caters for special needs - and that's like searching for hen's teeth!

Another of Blair's daft ideas. One of his big things was doing away with special needs schools and steering kids with learning difficulties back into mainstream education, which has obviously worked brilliantly...

Special needs schools are for exactly that - those kids with "special needs".

If you've got a kid who is just not academically gifted and slightly below par, that doesn't make them a 'special needs' kid - that's why they go to mainstream school. It's always been like that for decades.

And FYI, there are more special needs schools these days than there were in my school days.
Heck, in my day, the only special needs schools you ever heard of were those for the likes of Downs kids and CF, MS etc where the staff wouldn't be able to cope with them and all the other kids in the class.

Many kids with so-called 'learning difficulties' were just lazy kids that didn't want to go to school.
My step-son is one such kid.
Genuine kids with learning difficulties do have a greater choice these days.
What Blair did was to weed out the lazy kids so there were more facilities for the genuine ones.

And no, before you ask or acuse, I don't support Labour and never have done.




Politesub53 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/28/2012 11:09:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
I think a direct comparison of education in my day and just 1 generation later, in the same area, is a perfectly valid comparison to make.
My school hours were longer, had fewer and shorter breaks, and didn't have a multitude of days off for 'teacher training'.
Every subject was covered over a hugely wider area and was much more in-depth.

Read the rest of my post regarding the exams and results.

It's not just my own experience - the numbers are fake because the exams and subject matter are shit-loads easier.
This has been acknowledged by the teachers and the exam boards - it's not a myth.
Easier lessons and easier exams make for more 'passes'.

That's why we are where we are in the global tables.
It's basically fudged results brought about by easier exams.



No, the results are fake because you wish them to be. You say you have been in the US since 2002, so anything you claim to have experienced yourself is outdated.

The main reason we are short of engineers and such is because firms have stopped training them. In the old days, you left school, took on an apprenticeship at a reduced rate of wages, and normally had to agree to stay with a firm twelve months on qualifying. That was in return for your training. Nowadays that doesnt happen on the numbers it used to.




Politesub53 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/28/2012 11:13:22 AM)

"What Blair did was to weed out lazy kids so there were more facilities for the genuine ones "

FFS what planet are you on........ Education up to school leaving age is compulsory, Blair couldnt legally refuse anyone even if he wanted to.

Your suggestion is moronic.




Moonhead -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/28/2012 11:22:35 AM)

He presumably feels that unless a kid's physically disabled, then any problems their parents claim that they have is just an excuse for poor performance, and can be ignored.
I've known a few teachers who've worked with kids with serious psychological issues who'd disagree very strongly with that, but his attitude is obviously coloured more by his perception of his stepson than anything else.
(Certainly Blair did fuck all to "weed out lazy kids so there were more facilities for the genuine one": his approach was more ensuring that it was almost impossible for "lazy kids" to be weeded out, through forcing everybody to stay in education longer and by making exams easier to pass, which are both approaches that favour "lazy kids" over the ones who are actually willing to put in a bit of an effort. If somebody who can barely count is guaranteed a "c" for their maths GCSE, it means that "a"s and "b"s are devalued as well. "Education, education, education," my fucking arse.)




Politesub53 -> RE: Skills Don’t Pay the Bills - The "Skills Gap" Myth (11/28/2012 11:39:38 AM)

I cant argue with any of that Moon. Dyslexia and other needs have only become understood in the last decade or two.

My point about skills is correct though. Firms moan about a lack of qualified staff but dont take the lead with training like they used to, mores the pity. Thats one reason why we have such a high rate of youth unemployment. Schools need to do their bit by ensuring kids have at least the basics of English and Maths.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875