Edwynn
Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: xBullx -Fast Reply- You can't blame "the wealthy" in the future when they own the company store that you all work for, if it was your champions that lead you to it. The hell you say. Sorry Mr. Revisionist, but the company store was given away over two decades ago, and I am not alone in pointing to the exact culprit, along with those who voted for him in 1980 and 1984. Whether "the government is the problem" was true or not up to that point, Reagan made damn sure that 'government' would be a huge problem for its own citizens, not to mention the rest of the world, for many years beyond his term. His idea of 'less government' consisted of appointing every corporate CEO and super-lobbyist and whatever other functionaries of same to all the (what were previously) regulatory agencies and top Cabinet positions, and the pattern, with various slight alterations, has held ever since. Or perhaps you were in a well appointed cave at the time that GD Searle's Donald Rumsfeldt, Halliburton's Dick Cheney, Bechtel Corp.'s Casper Weinberger and George Schultz, Wendy Gramm, the (then) soon-to-be board member of Enron as reward for her assiduously not doing her job while Chair of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, or Goldman Sachs' Henry Paulson as Sec. of the Treasury, or ... all the others from that sector were let into the hen house. Well, that's a partial list, anyways, of what is a rather sizable corporately staffed roster of what can only euphemistically be called 'government.' So, no argument from this corner, a 'government' such as that most certainly presents a large number of problems.
< Message edited by Edwynn -- 11/27/2012 2:26:40 PM >
|