Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Banned fetishes


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Banned fetishes Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 6:50:08 AM   
theRose4U


Posts: 3403
Joined: 8/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FrostedFlake

The part that is objectionable is the ADVERTISEMENTS (I'm great, you don't even suck, fork over the dough!) that SOME shameless gold diggers feel PERFECTLY JUSTIFIED in pasting where I will trip over it.

If someone wants a findom, he can find one VERY EASILY. Everyone else is being abused by those who post such ads. I would like to see such ADVERTISEMENTS (I'm great, you don't even suck, fork over the dough!) BANNED by TOS. Because it is TROLLING. If someone thinks otherwise I pose this : What gives you the right to directly insult me AND almost everyone else? I mean, on FOX you would have to PAY to do that. Why should you get to advertise your business here for free?

UNREASONABLE? There is a page for these ADS. This should solve that.

http://www.collarchat.com/forumid_40/tt.htm

While I agree with the principle of your arguement that fin doms & porn fakes are a waste of male subs time...the work then falls on admins that are volunteers to wade through the sewage daily so you are happy. The additional caveat is the owner receives advertising money based on the number of members.
So the deal is for it to stay a free site & keep the admins in a better mood, I personally am fine with fin dommes.

_____________________________

Finding a good sub is like sifting through trail mix. You find a few fruits, a lotta nuts and have to sift to get to the sweet and special ones
drama llama

(in reply to FrostedFlake)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 6:52:34 AM   
theRose4U


Posts: 3403
Joined: 8/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

*sighs*
Gosh, everyone always wants to get rid of us. :(

Only the ones un-interested in their whining magical penises!

_____________________________

Finding a good sub is like sifting through trail mix. You find a few fruits, a lotta nuts and have to sift to get to the sweet and special ones
drama llama

(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 7:04:46 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		I don't think I can count the number of times I've laid a fiver in my hand after a really good session and said, "Go out and buy yourself something pretty."

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to theRose4U)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 10:36:51 AM   
NiceButMeanGirl


Posts: 2756
Joined: 11/4/2011
From: Bellingham, WA U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

There are a number of fetishes banned by tbe TOS here. Shouldnt Fin Domme be added to the list?

Short answer: NO. Whatever happened to YKINMK?

Long answer: Some banned fetishes are illegal and therefore should be banned. Others are very fringe/edgy but not illegal, so I don't know why they aren't on the available list except that CM's fetish list is not, by any means, exhaustive. As for fin-Dommes, there are also those who choose to be fin-slaves, so what's it to you? I'm not either, but I do think they have just as much right to exist as you do.

NBMG



< Message edited by NiceButMeanGirl -- 11/28/2012 10:38:13 AM >

_____________________________

I'm now SweetlySadistic1 on CollarSpace. NBMG is an old profile, please see my new one.


(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 10:52:25 AM   
Rochsub2009


Posts: 2536
Status: offline 		Sigh. Another financial Domme thread.

Live and let live. That's all I have to say about that.

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 10:54:56 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		You're just pissed off cuz nobody will give you enough money to get that blue shit off your face, how much you been selling the directions to my secret walleye hole for anyhow, Roch? 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 11:06:10 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline 		If being a financial Domme is a kink then why aren't men doing it too? I don't believe for a second that its a kink. Its business through and through. I don't think there is anything wrong with that sort of business so long as its legit and its not just some thieving criminal using peoples vulnerabilities for their own gain.

As for animals being dumb one has to look at comparative behavior in factory farming and roaming animals. Factory farmed animals often suffer from retardation and brain damage.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 11:12:46 AM   
Rochsub2009


Posts: 2536
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

If being a financial Domme is a kink then why aren't men doing it too?



Hmmmmmmm, maybe I should create a new niche. I think I'm going to become a financial Dom. Any takers?

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 11:35:29 AM   
obeyxmilla


Posts: 14
Joined: 9/25/2012
Status: offline 		There are plenty of male financial dominants.

Clip/content producers treat findom as a business. They shoot and record fetish fantasies, upload, and wait for the sales to roll in. This method is favorable because it requires little to no interaction on either end. No worrying about wanky dudes faking and consuming precious time.

I don't approach findom this way and I know I'm not alone.

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 12:56:49 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline 		I've come across a few financial male doms. They do exist, they simply are not as many of them. The reason for that is because a woman can get a man for free by just standing still and not doing anything at all.

Men are the only ones desperate enough to pay for it. Like I said, no one is forcing them to do so. It's not like someone is hacking into their bank account and stealing all their money. If a domme tells them to give them money all the man has to do is say one simple word.....no. And then walk away. Simple.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to obeyxmilla)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 12:57:37 PM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: obeyxmilla

There are plenty of male financial dominants.

Clip/content producers treat findom as a business. They shoot and record fetish fantasies, upload, and wait for the sales to roll in. This method is favorable because it requires little to no interaction on either end. No worrying about wanky dudes faking and consuming precious time.

I don't approach findom this way and I know I'm not alone.


They are business men and what says they are dominant? I know a few men that do this and they are just part of the porn industry.
I'm talking about men online having profiles demanding money from women for 'online domination. Point me to one of those and I will laugh hysterically

(in reply to obeyxmilla)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 1:44:31 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline 		Yeah, can't say as I have a problem with findom/mes.

The suggestion to add a search criterion thing might be nice to help people meet the ones they're looking for, but there are a billion other things they could do before even thinking about that one (e.g. being able to check more than one country at a time, being able to search for people looking for what you might be to them, etc.).

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 1:46:46 PM   
searching4mysir


Posts: 2757
Joined: 6/16/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB


quote:

ORIGINAL: obeyxmilla

There are plenty of male financial dominants.

Clip/content producers treat findom as a business. They shoot and record fetish fantasies, upload, and wait for the sales to roll in. This method is favorable because it requires little to no interaction on either end. No worrying about wanky dudes faking and consuming precious time.

I don't approach findom this way and I know I'm not alone.


They are business men and what says they are dominant? I know a few men that do this and they are just part of the porn industry.
I'm talking about men online having profiles demanding money from women for 'online domination. Point me to one of those and I will laugh hysterically



I've seen them and I do laugh at them. Particularly if they message me, my response is usually "BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA"


_____________________________

No longer searching -- found my one and only right here on CM


(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 1:49:57 PM   
obeyxmilla


Posts: 14
Joined: 9/25/2012
Status: offline 		You said they didn't exist; I said they do.

I'm not sure why the gender of the sub is relevant. I'm also not sure whether both parties being genuinely invested in the kink is what qualifies it as kink.


(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 1:50:55 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline 		The financial Doms I've come across usually are exactly like the findommes. I also know financial tops. The femsubs pay them to play with them. I have no idea how much business they receive though.


_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to searching4mysir)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 2:06:14 PM   
coldslayer


Posts: 155
Joined: 9/19/2012
Status: offline 		Hi!

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 2:15:26 PM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14441
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB

If being a financial Domme is a kink then why aren't men doing it too?


I've come across a few male FinDoms.

Also, everyone seems to be locked on the "pay me a tribute to talk to me" version of this, but financial domination can also be the Dominant controlling the finances as part of the dynamic.


< Message edited by OsideGirl -- 11/28/2012 2:16:04 PM >

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 2:16:38 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder

The financial Doms I've come across usually are exactly like the findommes. I also know financial tops. The femsubs pay them to play with them. I have no idea how much business they receive though.


Don't tell em what I charge you-it'll skew my rates for ages

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 2:32:05 PM   
Nakhla


Posts: 104
Joined: 10/24/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Looks to me that the entire idea of the fetishes that are banned here are the ones that are

NON CONSENTUAL.

If it is consentual it is in.  

Do I about got that right?  Well, you fuckin' Sie A I do.


Nope. Incest between consenting adults can be perfectly consensual, yet also, totally illegal in the USA, Canada, and much of the rest of the world. ( Hence it being a no-go topic here. )

_____________________________

Submediant In Search Of Dominant Resolution... Formerly WestBaySlave on these forums.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Banned fetishes - 11/28/2012 2:38:37 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: coldslayer

Hi!


Hello!!!!!

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to coldslayer)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Banned fetishes Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141