jlf1961
Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008 From: Somewhere Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Recently I put a bid in on a 9k22 Soviet Era Tunguska Anti-Aircraft vehicle. I received information detailing the following restrictions on the vehicle and all attached systems. 1) The radar unit was removed. 2) The anti aircraft guns were demilled and made nonoperational 3) the rubber road tracks cleats would not be supplied with the vehicle. What this means is that the only function the vehicle has is as a 75,000 pound off road vehicle. Now here is the problem, I have a canceled carry permit, own a nice collection of guns, and if I wanted to, I could get the proper licensing to own automatic weapons such as the M2 fifty cal machine gun. So the question is, why he hell wont the Federal Government and the ATF allow me to buy an operational anti-aircraft tank. I think that this is an example of unreasonable firearms restrictions. You cannot operate a mobile radar station in the US without a license (and that license is not easy to get). A pair of operational 30mm chainguns would make the whole vehicle harder to sell becuse most people do not have the appropriate licenses. The road cleats would not make the thing able to be driven on roads without tearing up the surface, they just reduce the damage. I really doubt you could get the thing to pass an emmissions test anyway. The stock powerplant is a V12 diesel. Anway what do you want with it? Going to shoot down passing airliners? I have had to endure a massive influx of large flocks of black birds.
_____________________________
Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think? You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of. Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI
|