Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Entering the 21st century....


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Entering the 21st century.... Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Entering the 21st century.... - 12/3/2012 5:40:44 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
I suspect that my old tv is soon going to make me go kicking and screaming into the 21st century.

So, LED...LCD....WTF...GAG.....what is the best tv nowadays.

And yes, I googled, but there's a few of ya whose opinion I would like.

_____________________________

yep
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/3/2012 5:46:24 PM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
Ha - good luck with that. I still have four - yes, four - tube TV's in my house. I am kicking and screaming, myself.

(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/3/2012 5:53:36 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
I have 2. I do not wanna change dammit!!!!

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/3/2012 6:36:22 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
LED is Light-emitting diode. There are a gazillion in the screen of an LED tv. So. . . pulling an example COMPLETELY from random. . .let's say that you have a small child that comes up with this brilliant idea of tapping on the screen with a fine point ball pen. . . only one diode might be damaged, leaving the tv screen pretty much unaffected.

LCD is Liquid crystal display. Taking the above COMPLETELY random and crazy example, it is likely that your screen is now fubar and you need a new tv.

I suggest a LED screen tv. They are more expensive, but are more likely to survive . . . impacts . . . of any kind.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/3/2012 6:39:49 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
LED

The higher the pixels the better the picture.



_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/3/2012 6:57:29 PM   
MasterG2kTR


Posts: 6677
Joined: 8/7/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline
I would go LED. LCD is a good choice too though. Stay with the 1080 (not 720) models and a refresh rate of at least 75Hz. Getting into the 120Hz range is better.

(in reply to littlewonder)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/3/2012 7:00:46 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
Aylee, ouch is all I can say.

We went into Best Buy and the clerk spent 20 minutes showing us the difference on the different tvs. All I can remember is that we went with the higher number (1020?) because when she showed a sport game at that and at the lower one, I got a little sick watching it.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to MasterG2kTR)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/3/2012 9:53:41 PM   
shallowdeep


Posts: 343
Joined: 9/1/2006
From: California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

LED is Light-emitting diode. There are a gazillion in the screen of an LED tv. So. . . pulling an example COMPLETELY from random. . .let's say that you have a small child that comes up with this brilliant idea of tapping on the screen with a fine point ball pen. . . only one diode might be damaged, leaving the tv screen pretty much unaffected.

The marketing and terms can be confusing, but this information is not correct. An LED television set is an LCD – the only difference between other LCDs is the type of backlight used. LCDs are a bit like (lots and lots of very tiny) stained glass windows, each with a transistor-controlled venetian blind; some sort of light is needed to shine through the pixels from the back so that you can see them lit up from the front if the blind is open. Traditionally, this backlight was supplied by cold-cathode fluorescent lamps. Sets advertised as LED displays have simply replaced the fluorescent tubes behind the LCD panel with several white LEDs instead. This doesn't confer much resistance to damage, but it does have other advantages: LED sets tend to be more power efficient, the backlight should have a longer life, and, with edge lighting, sets can be noticeably thinner than they can with fluorescents. As an added bonus, there's no mercury or UV involved.

As an aside, Sony actually did show off a prototype of a a direct LED display TV earlier this year, where each sub pixel is, in fact, a separate LED, but it isn't the sort of thing you can currently buy. OLEDs work similarly, with the pixel elements being the light sources and they have made it into some smart phones and other small screens, but big OLED screens probably aren't going to be available until next year and will be quite expensive. The advantage of both is about image quality rather than durability, however.

As a general response to the original post, the specs you want in a TV will depend on how you use your TV and what you want to be able to do with it. Things to consider: How large do you want the display to be? Where will you be viewing it from - in terms of both distance and ambient light? What devices might you be hooking up to it? What content do you want to be able to view on it? Do you have a budget?

With that said, an LED-backlit LCD is probably a good option for most use. Unless you are getting a small set, it's probably worthwhile to get 1080p (1920x1080 pixels, sometimes referred to as "Full HD") resolution. 1080p can give higher image detail than 720p (1280x720 pixels) resolution, providing the source material is also high resolution. Television isn't actually currently broadcast in 1080p, but Blu-ray Discs, some online content, still photographs, and, increasingly, some home videos can take full advantage of it. It also means the TV can be more more useable as a computer monitor.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/4/2012 3:30:53 AM   
Muttling


Posts: 1612
Joined: 9/30/2007
Status: offline
I hate these dot matrix things, my Smith Corona was soooooooo much better.

(in reply to shallowdeep)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/4/2012 4:06:26 AM   
ARIES83


Posts: 3648
Status: offline
LED

_____________________________

530 DAYS

(in reply to Muttling)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Entering the 21st century.... - 12/4/2012 5:26:44 AM   
ashjor911


Posts: 7793
Joined: 9/7/2010
From: balcony, having a Smoke
Status: offline
1- LCD with LED back light ... not the ususal neun back light.
2- Plasma .. if you into that & willing to change it every 4-5 years or so .. but the Plasma can view infront of the sunlight..
its way way much cooler

_____________________________

"operative" working undercover for the federal government of bangladesh.

my name is : bonsh ... jamesh bonsh.
code name : 009.5
licensed to give formla

(in reply to ARIES83)
Profile   Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> Entering the 21st century.... Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094