Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: We have been conned for 2016 years.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/10/2012 10:56:43 PM   
littlewonder


Posts: 15659
Status: offline
The three wise men were what they call Magi. They were priests and priests at that time studied the stars and heavens. They were from the Persian region and under their Zoroastrian religion, the star was a sign of a divine king being born of both light and fire, which also is told in the scrolls that were written by the Essenes. So they followed this star to Bethlehem but stopping in Jerusalem on their way most likely for food and to meet with the priestly sect of Jews who also may have had the same sign. Being they were Magi, it would have been customary for them to meet with Herod upon their arrival. When inquired as to why they were there they had told Herod about the birth of a divine king. Herod requests that they return to him to tell him of this great king. The Magi then finally find Mary and Joseph and the birth of Jesus. Upon leaving Bethlehem however, the Magi overhear about the order by Herod to kill all children a year and under so they return home on another route so as to avoid Herod and his army.

But I personally don't see any of this information to be important. Does it really matter about the details of honoring a man who spoke great words? Now I personally do not think that Jesus is Christ just as Buddha is not a deity but those who practice Buddhism also honor Buddha's birth and death. Even the Pope has written a new book in which he also agrees that the birth date and many other "facts" are wrong but he sees nothing wrong in still celebrating the birth of Jesus. He feels that science and religion are very compatible just as I feel also. The date doesn't matter. It's that we are celebrating a day of a great man.





_____________________________

Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to stellauk)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/10/2012 11:05:55 PM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
This depends on who you choose to believe. The girl, I think her name was Ayesha or some such, is considered to be a sort of holy personage in her own right. According to her account she married Mohammed at the age of 6, but did not have sex with him until she was 9. The story can be found in the Sahih Burkhari, which is probably the second holiest book in Islam. It's a collection of the Prophet Mohammed's teaching and life that have been collected from various sources. One of the sources on this very topic is alleged to be Ayesha herself.

Apparently this girl spent hours every day listening to Mohammed and was as knowledgeable in his teachings as any man. Some contemporary sources even claim she could recite the entire Koran from memory. Many modern Imams will praise her intelligence and knowledge then call her a confused and foolish child on the subject of her virginity because their prophet having sex with a 9 year old girl is not good politics in the 21st century.

That part of her account is a lie. Therefore I must suspect that there may also be other untruths in the Sahih Burkhari. Nor is this Sahih Burkhari in any way a text provided by nor condoned by the 'angel' and 'god' whom Mohamed met in person, so it is without value whatsoever.

_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/11/2012 12:07:08 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel
I reject the notion that Jesus was the one and only son of God.

In a literal sense of course he was not. He was a child of Mary and his father is likely to have been Joseph. But the literal sense and the rejection are a dead end way to go.

What is important and the right way to go are:
1. Joseph was convinced that he had not fathered Jesus, yet he raised this supposed bastard child as his own. In that culture that was HUGE. Ever since Christians have raised bastard children as if they were gifts from God - and in fact, provided that the female chose to make love to whomever fathered the child, they are.
2. Accepting that Jesus was the son of God both legitimized him and opened the way to declare at the council of Nicea (if I recall correctly) that he and God and the holy spirit are identical, legitimizing Jesus even more. This legitimization enabled the people of those times - and most of them were animals - to accept what Jesus and Christianity had to offer, and subsequently to as a population start to evolve from animal status to a more human status.

quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel
I sometimes question the existence of a god at all.

The Divine by definition must be impartial. So it does not care whether someone does or does not question its existence. It will respond - if possible - to the spiritual requests of all living organisms and perchance to the spiritual requests - if any - of inanimate matter as well.

_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to erieangel)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/11/2012 3:14:18 AM   
SadistDave


Posts: 801
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule
That part of her account is a lie. Therefore I must suspect that there may also be other untruths in the Sahih Burkhari. Nor is this Sahih Burkhari in any way a text provided by nor condoned by the 'angel' and 'god' whom Mohamed met in person, so it is without value whatsoever.


No supporting evidence. Only two people know for sure whether or not any part of her account is true or false.

However, I base my opinion that it is probably true, or at least believed to be the truth by many Muslims, on three facts concerning Islam.

1. Pedophilia was fairly common up until the middle of the last century and Muslim men still marry child brides in some of the more remote areas where Islam is still prevalent. It's still legal, but quickly going out of fashion. More countries are adopting Western laws governing the age of consent.

2. Ayesha was reputed to have a very keen intellect. I'm pretty sure she would have been able to count high enough to know her age when she lost her virginity.

3 Muslims still consider her version to be the truth today.

-SD

_____________________________

To whom it may concern: Just because someone is in a position of authority they do not get to make up their own facts. In spite of what some people here (who shall remain nameless) want to claim, someone over the age of 18 is NOT a fucking minor!

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/11/2012 4:25:25 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
No supporting evidence.

As far as you and all them billions of other people know.

I have two convincing arguments - but I ain't telling.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
Only two people know for sure whether or not any part of her account is true or false.

I bet that there were several more, but all of them are dead. That leaves me as the only one to know for sure that that part of the account attributed to her is false. It may have been a white lie. If I recall correctly - but I may be wrong - she never remarried. It would have been to her benefit, increasing her status, to have falsely claimed to have had a sexual relationship with Mohamed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
However, I base my opinion that it is probably true, or at least believed to be the truth by many Muslims, on three facts concerning Islam.

Sure it is believed to be true by many Muslims. They want Peace, not so? So if it is true, they will not have to act against pedophiles marrying underage children. (Though often it may be non-pedophiles marrying such under-age girls for economic or social reasons.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
1. Pedophilia was fairly common up until the middle of the last century and Muslim men still marry child brides in some of the more remote areas where Islam is still prevalent. It's still legal

It indicates that there is something seriously wrong with their gene pool. (Of course there is something wrong in all cultures in which pedophilia occurs, but I have no knowledge how prevalent pedophilia is in the various cultures and populations.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
2. Ayesha was reputed to have a very keen intellect.

Ah, that may be a third argument in favor of her never having had a sexual relationship with any male.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
2. I'm pretty sure she would have been able to count high enough to know her age when she lost her virginity.

If she is alive today, undoubtedly she is still counting as she never lost her virginity.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
3. Muslims still consider her version to be the truth today.

Truth is not determined by a democratic vote. People who parrot earlier people and cannot think for themselves arguably are animals. I won't object to the humanivorous Wraiths descending on Earth with their spaceships and consuming them.

< Message edited by Rule -- 12/11/2012 4:29:05 AM >


_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/11/2012 4:24:39 PM   
SadistDave


Posts: 801
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
Again, you present no evidence. You haven't based your opinions on anything at all yet, other than the phrase "It's a lie." and wholly unsubstantiated suppositions. It's not a particularly compelling argument since you have presented zero evidence to support your position. You keep trying to present your opinions as though they are established facts, but all of your debate points appear to be nothing other than your personal opinion.

At this point I'm pretty sure I can present more evidence for your case than you possibly could, all of which is easily discounted, discredited, or debunked. If you have done any research at all then perhaps that's why you have chosen to present no evidence at all, but I see no valid reason to believe that the Prophet Mohammed was anything other than a pedophile based on nothing more than someone else's opinion.

-SD-

_____________________________

To whom it may concern: Just because someone is in a position of authority they do not get to make up their own facts. In spite of what some people here (who shall remain nameless) want to claim, someone over the age of 18 is NOT a fucking minor!

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/11/2012 4:52:27 PM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
Again, you present no evidence. You haven't based your opinions on anything at all yet, other than the phrase "It's a lie." and wholly unsubstantiated suppositions. It's not a particularly compelling argument since you have presented zero evidence to support your position.

You are an astute observer!

Indeed, I have not.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
At this point I'm pretty sure I can present more evidence for your case than you possibly could

Well, go ahead. What is holding you back?

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
all of which is easily discounted, discredited, or debunked.

Oh.

Well, in that case: please don't bother.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
If you have done any research at all then perhaps that's why you have chosen to present no evidence at all

No, it isn't.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SadistDave
I see no valid reason to believe that the Prophet Mohammed was anything other than a pedophile based on nothing more than someone else's opinion.

That is unfortunate.

I recommend that you pray to see a valid reason; perchance the Divine will oblige you.

_____________________________

"I tend to pay attention when Rule speaks" - Aswad

"You are sweet, kind, and ever so smart, Rule. You ALWAYS stretch my mind and make me think further than I might have on my own" - Duskypearls

Si vis pacem, para bellum.

(in reply to SadistDave)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/11/2012 5:32:06 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Actually not really conned, but there were some shady stuff going on back then.

First, lets get rid of the December 25th as the birth day of Christ. When Constantine legalized the Christian church, he had some conditions, one of which was that the feast for the birth of Christ be celebrated on the same day as the high feast for Sol Ivictus, the Roman sun god.

Contact Hallmark...they may have been involved.

To be honest, no shepherd in his right mind would have his sheep in the fields this time of year in the holy land.

(You don't know the shepards I do).

Now lets look at the year of Christ's birth, it would have to have been before the year 4 AD, since that was the year that Herod died. To get even more confusing is the part of the story about Caesar Augustus decreeing that "all the world be taxed," that little tidbit pushes the year of Christ's birth to before 14AD, the year that Augustus died.

God created the Heavens and the earth in 6 days...he could have easily just said..."hey what the fuck....14 AD....0 AD...I am the fucking It and ALL there was...so...fuck you and the calendar you rode in on".

With that taken care of, let us look at some of the legal aspects in effect at the time.

First, the "world" that Augustus referred to would have only included Roman citizens, not the non-citizens of the lands not considered provinces. In other words, Joseph was not subject to this decree. His taxes would have been levied by the local governor.

Then he was like all the others....47% pay no taxes....nothing new here.

Secondly, even if Joseph were subject to this tax by being a Roman subject, he would have been taxed in the town he lived in. The Romans were methodical and efficient, not anal retentive.

Why Bethlehem?

Easy...it was where all the good Bing Crosby songs would come from (don't think God didn't know the future and the past....uh huh....yeah....I thought so).

This is simple, to fulfill an old testament prophecy about the coming messiah. This fact was well known to Jews at the time of Christ, so the authors of the gospels had to give him the proper street cred, in literary circles, this is called staging.

The Gospel of Luke is the only gospel that has Joseph and Mary traveling to Bethlehem, the gospel of Mathew puts them there already.

Prophecy.

The only way to make this conflict work is like this, the author of Mathew knew that Joseph and Mary lived in Bethlehem and later moved to Nazareth, while the author of Luke did not know this fact.

And of course, Joseph was an uncaring, cruel man to make is pregnant wife travel late in her pregnancy. Considering the risks, this could have been fatal.

But God foresaw Medicare....and SNAP benefits. Problem solved.


So, let us fix that problem by making the statement that Joseph and Mary lived in Bethlehem at the time of Christ's birth.

Of course there is the bigger problem, why would 3 pagan kings journey to Bethlehem to honor a baby Jew? Not only that, but if the star they followed was so badly placed that it led them to Jerusalem first, then it moved to show them to Bethlehem. Anyone see the problem with this?

Newp....They had Navistar.

Now, the gospels concerning Jesus' life clearly demonstrates his divinity, with the miracles he performed, so why go through the trouble of all the inconsistencies concerning his birth? Who were these gospels aimed at, contemporary Jews, making it easy for them to convert by making the birth of Christ be in line with the old testament prophecy?

Christian theologians have been trying to explain these points for over 2000 years.

(Thankfully I'm here to resolve all these idiosyncrasies).

For me, I believe that Jesus was the son of god, and he died for our sins. I also believe that his early life was subject to authors taking creative license with the facts.


That and...they didn't have the Gutenberg press at the time....ergo...a few slips.....

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. - 12/11/2012 5:49:26 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Does it matter as long as you still get the presents?

QFT. We have a winner!

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 29
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: We have been conned for 2016 years. Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094