epiphiny43
Posts: 688
Joined: 10/20/2006 Status: offline
|
Most people have a fantasy version of what the role of the police is in our republic. They are responsible for protecting NOBODY. Theoretically, they are responsible for protecting the community, but not any single person. They are responsible for reacting to a crime once it's committed. Some threats are crimes in themself, you have to establish credibility to get a response, and usually an identity or location for them to work with. Occasionally some of the more motivated LEOs manage to get permission to do proactive work. Which usually gets questions about funding and taxes. Normally, they are responsible for catching Someone the DA can make a case against. If it happens to be the actual criminal, hooray? A neighbor has a restraining order against her ice addicted husband. He isn't to approach within 100 ft. of the property. He's been arrested 7 times for violation of the RO and actually been on the property well over 100 times. What's wrong with this picture? He has explicitly threatened her life. The police tell her to call when he shows on the property. We reckon the only reason she is still alive is his mother is in town and has rented a house where she is supervising him. She blames the evil wife for lying about her darling son. This wife needs a gun! Or to move to another country. Her children were born here and won't transition well to her home, Japan. Every one is just hoping he gets really high and finally shows his underside to his mother in ways she can't stay in denial about and she gets him put in some institutional rehab before he makes the front page. There are Thousands of cases just like this and worse all over the country. The police are totally undermanned and frankly, incompetent to deal with this sort of family violence and dysfunction. And if they weren't, they wouldn't have the legal tools to take much action. The prisons are already full of people who were actually violent,(Or caught up on the War on Drugs!) and are even greater dangers. Until someone is bleeding out on the ground or getting patched back together in the ER, the situation is not one they usually get involved in constructively. Which is way too late. Exactly these situations are why victims advocates are stressed by stupid laws that make at-risk citizens wait during 'cooling off' periods before completing a gun buy. When the ex- is stalking and hasn't slept for days with his disorder, you don't need to cool off, you need lethal force on your side to keep you alive. Another reason? "Happiness is a warm gun." Like Jazz, if we have to explain it, you still wouldn't get it.
< Message edited by epiphiny43 -- 12/18/2012 9:23:57 PM >
|