RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message

mnottertail -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (12/27/2012 7:28:12 AM)

This whole thing could have been put on the back of a matchbook. 
I have never seen so much saying so little about nothing for so long.
I think that a tab of mickey mouse microdot couldn't salvage this piece of shit.

And that's about the entirety of my view.



Hillwilliam -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (12/27/2012 7:33:39 AM)

Can we quote you on that?



mnottertail -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (12/27/2012 7:41:23 AM)

Yes, you may quote me, and you can carve it on my gravestone.



yugla -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (12/28/2012 8:07:03 AM)



quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha
. . you state that the photo problem was years ago, yet you have a comment about it CURRENTLY in your profile, hence I thought it must be current. My bad.


No problem Video - Since threads often move and fade too fast and ideas will get lost online in translation. Let me expand on the original question. That is listed as a journal entry. For some reason it would not stay posted in the forum section when posted at length.


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP

You could ask people to read your journal entry and answer in the thread. Or give the background in the journal entry, referring to it in your thread, while asking just the bare bones questions in the thread.




TO EXPAND ON:
My question is directed at both single females and males who use dating sights. Reading a few random profiles of lesbian women on Collar Me some have a relating position on this; in their profile warning that <SCREEN NAME HERE> is a fake. They felt strong enough to mention this in their profile. I would take that to mean it was of importance to them. Speaking with friends of mine (in person not on line) both Domme and sub, male and female, GBTS dating sights seem to carry a large grain of salt with them as well.

I find it depressing that on the forums' side of a lifestyle social networking sight there is so much belligerent rebuttal. I have always found that in speaking with other life stylers we have many common opinions. If we have conflicting opinions we discuss it, formulate new ideas and perhaps I will expand my view on it or they will. Or we may just simply agree to disagree but recognize the merit in each others' thoughts.

That is not as true on line. Why?



Pax Vobiscum



yugla -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (12/28/2012 8:17:08 AM)

I am getting impressions of others by what they comment; from the first reply from DesFIP to yours.
It does require a lot of history to follow and the subject is out of context so I do weigh that into the brashness of the posts.

Do you trip often?
Have you or do you know any one who ever mixed a scene when tripping? That could quite possibly snap a few brain cells... or build the perfect slave - lol or maybe not.


Be Well

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

This whole thing could have been put on the back of a matchbook. 
I have never seen so much saying so little about nothing for so long.
I think that a tab of mickey mouse microdot couldn't salvage this piece of shit.

And that's about the entirety of my view.





yugla -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (1/26/2013 8:42:43 AM)

I have a hypotheses . The site owners are trying to generate web traffic and by catering to sheeple who live in a virtual reality, that is the most profitable for the site <sic sight> . As for why when sheeple like me raises a question about the bona fideness of CM with supporting argument and the other numerous experiences that the majority of male and female users find on this site do as well, it is not well received by the sheepl on here... you could equate that to proving to a devout catholic that earth is not the only life in the universe - you know the movie.. the same level of hatred would be revealed. I've just killed your 'virtual' life and human nature can be one to defend to the death in an attack.


Be Well



But I'l continue to fuck with the sheeple.....




DesFIP -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (1/26/2013 5:40:44 PM)

Apparently lesbians on here complain about others.

You've never noticed people in real life complaining about others?

You still don't make any sense but your reference to tripping indicates why. Get some help, get clean.



Level -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (1/26/2013 5:58:32 PM)

The op riding to save the village:

[image]http://killscreendaily.com/media/uploads/mp.jpg[/image]



yugla -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (1/27/2013 5:30:11 AM)

Dear Level

It would require a fair amount of reading beginning with my journal entry that was too long to post in the message boards, and then weeding through the typical unrelated banter and an occasional moderator trying to save face for the 'masters' that run CM and steer this thread away from the topic I seek to understand

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP
You've never noticed people in real life complaining about others?

That is an equal analogy but misses the idea in this thread regarding web based social networking sites The complaining on CM in the forums appears directed back towards anything that does not go along with the idea that this is a bona fide site. Why?


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP
You still don't make any sense but your reference to tripping indicates why. Get some help, get clean.


Again you would have to read back a few posts

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I think that a tab of mickey mouse microdot couldn't salvage this piece of shit.


to see that I was askingmnothertail if she has or knows anyone who has included LSD in lifestyle play to help build the perfect submissive.

Be Well



yugla -> RE: Maximum length to a thread entry? or... (2/16/2013 10:27:48 PM)

2.17.13 arcnaine



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125