RE: The decline of collarme

RE: The decline of collarme (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

NocturnalStalker -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:09:05 PM)
I got the signal in the sky like Batman.

Hillwilliam -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:09:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker It's okay darlings, I'm here. Wow... back again huh? He's a masochist, remember?

lizi -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:09:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: lizi If the person reviewing them was going very quickly what if they inadvertently let an illegal one slip through with a child or something else on it? It would be posted and "approved" by the site. The site is then saying it's ok to have it up, they could be held liable for the illegal content lurking about in some back corner of someone's profile. This place could conceivably be shut down and prosecuted. From the site's standpoint, I'd think it would be much better to have people report the illegal pictures and have the process removed from their administration with a buffer zone. It would be almost impossible on a site of this size to keep it completely clean of law violations, better for the owners to not be personally responsible for the vetting of pictures. Yes lizzy - and that is where the reporting feature would pic it up - just like it is at the moment. You can upload any number of illegal pics on here and they'll stay there until someone reports it. Nobody vets the initial uploading of the pics, so it could be anything. What I'm saying is, you can catch the vast majory of them at the initial glance and it's easy to do. Anything else, you deal with as it comes along, just like it is now. I believe you may have missed my point. Which was that if standard operating procedure on this site was for the admin to personally vet all the pictures one by one, if an illegal one slipped through, it would be formally approved as being ok to be on here. So if someone reported this illegal picture to the authorities, the site could probably be sued for posting illegal pictures. You can't really say "ok...we'll vet all the pictures and any that escape our notice will be picked up by the public reporting process," if you are also saying "we will personally examine each picture one by one and the ones that we allow to be posted are said to be proper and legal by this site." It's like merchandisers having to stand by what they post in their advertisements or on their packaging.

tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:12:27 PM)
quote: They don't have to be art critics. If they see a pic of a person in a photo, even if it's not the profile person they can let it go until someone reports it - just like they do now. If it isn't, and its an obvious pic not of the person, it initially gets kicked out unless the person appeals the decision. Define obvious? If its a man's profile, and he posts a woman's pic, how do they know that isnt his slave, or his mistress, and he has either rexpressed permission by ownership, or orders, to place that photo? quote: As far as I'm concerned, unless you happen to have a personal piece of Warhol's art that he personally painted just for you, all of his works are commercial, up for public viewing, and certainly should not be used as a photo on a profile. That isnt the definition of commercial artwork. quote: Maybe we are confusing what you call 'commercial' and what I interpret the word commercial to be? To me, anything on public display, anywhere, makes it commercial. Why? Because it is being used to draw in money from other external sources even if not from the sale of the art itself. I gave you the definition. commercial art noun graphic art created specifically for commercial uses, especially for advertising, illustrations in magazines or books, or the like. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/commercial+art Not all of Warhol's work is commercial artwork.

Hillwilliam -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:13:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker I got the signal in the sky like Batman. Is this the signal you got? [image]local://upfiles/664494/953793409962431CBAD4F3E96608BAEB.jpg[/image]

tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:14:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker It's okay darlings, I'm here. Wow... back again huh? He's a masochist, remember? Shit, I keep forgetting.

NocturnalStalker -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:15:52 PM)
I'll have you all know I am possibly the most dominant dominant of all time.

Level -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:24:17 PM)
You're certainly getting a warm reception..

RemoteUser -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:32:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 The biggest problem I have with the site is that there is no way to order female subs or slaves.... It's easy to order them. Now ask me if they'll listen. Regarding the current flow of the thread's river...if the site puts the onus on the individual regarding the posting of copyrighted work, then if the hammer falls, it lands on the nail, not the thumb. Frankly, the only responsibility of governing that the staff should have to carry is their own dictates, i.e. what is considered explicit. If the staffing or resources are low, then it might behoove them to slow the expansion of the roster by requiring profiles to be given the "ok" before the account is activated. I've seen lots of sites use this method successfully in the past; it doesn't have to be intrusive or judgmental, merely a checklist of what's allowed and what's not. After that, the individual is liable. The same method could be applied to adding pictures, video journals (for explicit usage primarily, no one whacking off while giggling in a high-pitched voice), whatever is appropriate. If that seems too restrictive, consider the resources and staffing already in place, and how taxed they would be with a free site that has a few hundred thousand members. Even if the idea doesn't settle well, I'd rather cast an idea out on the table, then mumble in the sidelines. I prefer to be part of a solution - but that's just me.

tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:33:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker I'll have you all know I am possibly the most dominant dominant of all time. With that hair?

jlf1961 -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:33:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RemoteUser quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 The biggest problem I have with the site is that there is no way to order female subs or slaves.... It's easy to order them. Now ask me if they'll listen. Regarding the current flow of the thread's river...if the site puts the onus on the individual regarding the posting of copyrighted work, then if the hammer falls, it lands on the nail, not the thumb. Frankly, the only responsibility of governing that the staff should have to carry is their own dictates, i.e. what is considered explicit. If the staffing or resources are low, then it might behoove them to slow the expansion of the roster by requiring profiles to be given the "ok" before the account is activated. I've seen lots of sites use this method successfully in the past; it doesn't have to be intrusive or judgmental, merely a checklist of what's allowed and what's not. After that, the individual is liable. The same method could be applied to adding pictures, video journals (for explicit usage primarily, no one whacking off while giggling in a high-pitched voice), whatever is appropriate. If that seems too restrictive, consider the resources and staffing already in place, and how taxed they would be with a free site that has a few hundred thousand members. Even if the idea doesn't settle well, I'd rather cast an idea out on the table, then mumble in the sidelines. I prefer to be part of a solution - but that's just me. Isnt this site a catalog shopping site?

LadyPact -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:33:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker I'll have you all know I am possibly the most dominant dominant of all time. Last time I checked, that doesn't negate the possibility of someone being a masochist.

NocturnalStalker -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:34:45 PM)
I just so happen to be pretty.

tazzygirl -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:35:22 PM)
Pretty... I agree

NocturnalStalker -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:37:53 PM)
Why do people want to hurt me so much?

LadyPact -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:40:33 PM)
<<<<< Sadist, remember?

NocturnalStalker -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:46:33 PM)
You can't hurt me, I have a backbone.

littlewonder -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:48:24 PM)
I remember reading on a website somewhere, don't remember anymore, that it would actually take at least 30 moderators to volunteer on a site this size. I don't think we have anywhere even close to that.

RemoteUser -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:53:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote: ORIGINAL: RemoteUser quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 The biggest problem I have with the site is that there is no way to order female subs or slaves.... It's easy to order them. Now ask me if they'll listen. Isnt this site a catalog shopping site? The world is all a tangled skein of whimsical dreams and remorseless truths. This site in particular will only become a catalog when I see 10% off and sensible layaway plans.

RemoteUser -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/7/2013 6:55:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: littlewonder I remember reading on a website somewhere, don't remember anymore, that it would actually take at least 30 moderators to volunteer on a site this size. I don't think we have anywhere even close to that. Bingo. That's why I think of controlled expansion. A little birth control is sensible, and carries minor risks electronically as it does in any other form.

Page: << < prev 36 37 [38] 39 40 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875