RE: The decline of collarme (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


metamorfosis -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 10:26:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
...just because someone complains doesn't mean a violation has occurred. Sometimes the complainer is just a whiny little bitch.


That would make a good signature line.

Pam




metamorfosis -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 10:40:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
...I thought I'd ask for people's thoughts on this that are NOT related to moderation.


Sorry. Apparently all roads lead to "moderation".

Pam




LaTigresse -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 10:53:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida

Well I'd imagine if people didn't care, this thread wouldn't be at 44 pages. The degree of care likely depends on the person and subject, but a complete lack of care woukd have me wondering why people voluntarily spend their time at something they don't care about.

Telling someone to fuck off, in my view, denotes some level of care. So does telling people you dont care.

But I am curious how someone who expresses a desire for civility only a short while later comes to "fuck you."



I agree with you. And yes, the switcharoo was weird.

One thing I think we all kind of forget about is that, each of our degree of care varied based upon what the site means to us personally. What we get out of it.

If a person has very little social interaction in their lives outside of the internet and the people they interact with on it, their degree of care is going to be a lot more pronounced and personal. More emotional because they are more emotionally invested.

If a person sees the forums as an information source, with live feed back, but less so an emotionally invested social interaction......their degree of care is possibly going to be less than the previous person.

If a person sees the forums as an interactive bit of entertainment with less of the first and an occasional bit of the second, their level of emotional degree of care will possibly be even less.

For me, I care but it's very limited in emotional investment. As with another site I've frequented in the past, that contain live interaction and personalities, when the things I get from it are less than the effort to use it, I can and have, walked away from it without any emotional loss.

Some just seem to have more emotional investment than others. I've probably invested more deeply on an emotional level with movies or books.

I've never cried at anything on here. I've never gotten so angry I lost control. In fact I don't remember ever getting seriously angry. Annoyed, passionate about conveying my thoughts and debating an issue, certainly. But nothing I can't walk away from and switch mental gears almost immediately. I don't dwell on anything of emotional context from here.

Certainly I've had brain tickling moments, things that have fed the dead time as in, during my commute. Given me cause to think about something differently, etc. That is one of the aspects of here I would miss at times. And do now. As well as some of the humorous discussions of the past.

Now I feel we have much less meat. Much less brain tickling and much less chuckle worthy humour.




TAFKAA -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 11:17:22 AM)

With a water pistol. Meh.




Aswad -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 11:55:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: metamorfosis

Sorry. Apparently all roads lead to "moderation".


It's kind of the elephant in the room.

That said, there was some stuff said about the other aspects of it, as well.

Part of the problem is precisely that a lot of roads lead to moderation. We could improve this place if X, and oh, oops, X would run into the moderation problem. So, let's consider Y instead, but oops, that also runs into the moderation problem. Maybe we could get back poster Z, but no, that poster left because of the moderation problem. Solve that one problem, and a lot of the others may well solve themselves.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




NocturnalStalker -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 1:44:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TAFKAA

With a water pistol. Meh.


Careful now, he may block you.




blacksword404 -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 1:55:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker


quote:

ORIGINAL: TAFKAA

With a water pistol. Meh.


Careful now, he may block you.


I should have known you were back. There was a thick cloud of hair spray blocking out the sun. Run run the end is nigh.




NocturnalStalker -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 2:07:56 PM)

I've no problems with you, big man!




blacksword404 -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 2:25:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NocturnalStalker

I've no problems with you, big man!


Carry on then. [:D]




slaveluci -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 7:56:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida

Well I'd imagine if people didn't care, this thread wouldn't be at 44 pages. The degree of care likely depends on the person and subject, but a complete lack of care woukd have me wondering why people voluntarily spend their time at something they don't care about.

Telling someone to fuck off, in my view, denotes some level of care. So does telling people you dont care.



Indeed! There's a couple posters here with thousands upon thousands of posts who post everyday, many times a day. Every other post is about how they just don't care. Really? [8D]

luci




Aynne88 -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 8:08:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

~FR~

I think some of the righteous, stand up against the powers that oppress them types that are posting, are not being 100% up front about truth. I know this because I reported a post, and that person has gone on a crusade, but has not mentioned the portion that was being reported. Removing that portion of their post and spinning it is now making the mod squad look bad. If this is typical of what has been happening, then the posters that are doing this are causing the drama and now owning up to it. Guess it is kind of like those firefighters that set a fire so they can respond?

Very interesting indeed. I think this is creating your own drama so you have something to do, kind of like FB drama.


I'm way late as usual and this is an older post but uh yeah pretty much Orion.




Aynne88 -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 8:29:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TAFKAA

Rabid defense without justification is usually an ego-based response. There's no reason for your position to be so entrenched. Consequently, self-interest is the order of the day.

You're not being entirely honest.


nm. I just read the post that you are awareness. Carry on.




NuevaVida -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/8/2013 10:30:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse


I agree with you. And yes, the switcharoo was weird.

Well apparently that was a joke which flew beyond both you & I, eh?

quote:


One thing I think we all kind of forget about is that, each of our degree of care varied based upon what the site means to us personally. What we get out of it.

If a person has very little social interaction in their lives outside of the internet and the people they interact with on it, their degree of care is going to be a lot more pronounced and personal. More emotional because they are more emotionally invested.

This makes sense. When I was pretty much in isolation, the internet made up for nearly all of my social interaction, so I was very emotionally invested in those relationships - whether real or not.

quote:



If a person sees the forums as an information source, with live feed back, but less so an emotionally invested social interaction......their degree of care is possibly going to be less than the previous person.

If a person sees the forums as an interactive bit of entertainment with less of the first and an occasional bit of the second, their level of emotional degree of care will possibly be even less.


I also agree, but I do think there is *some* level of care.

quote:


For me, I care but it's very limited in emotional investment. As with another site I've frequented in the past, that contain live interaction and personalities, when the things I get from it are less than the effort to use it, I can and have, walked away from it without any emotional loss.


I understand the ability to walk away without emotional loss, and I understand not being emotionally invested. What always leaves me a little perplexed is when people say "I don't care - you're just pixels" as though whatever that person is saying doesn't matter. It's basically saying, "I don't care about you, or about anything you say, think or feel - you're just dots on my monitor." I don't understand negating a person that way. If you (generic) don't care about what someone has to say, why reply to them?

quote:



Now I feel we have much less meat. Much less brain tickling and much less chuckle worthy humour.

I agree here, too. But, like I mentioned some where in the single-digit pages at the beginning of this thread, I think that's just part ebb & flow. I don't think telling people they're just pixels whose words don't matter does much to encourage meaty conversations, though.

Honestly, I think the way to improve these boards is to post more meaty, thought provoking threads and less "this place sucks" threads.




LaTigresse -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/9/2013 4:03:54 AM)

I believe what many people are expressing though, is that they don't feel inclined to post more meaty, thought provoking threads.........because of the way their efforts are treated. If a person puts a lot of effort of any sort into writing something, only to have it shit all over (as they perceive it...) that will very likely cause them to avoid doing so again. I can't honestly say I've ever felt that way, at least not that I can remember. BUT, that is the gist of what I am reading from many. And some of that 'many' are posters whom I've enjoyed immensely. Some of whom, actually post intelligent, and thought provoking shit!

I know that my tastes are not those of everyone. I would rather read stuff I perceive as biased and offensive, but intelligently written, than a bunch of mindless fluff that is all polite and totally within every possible imagined boundary of TOS, whether it be written or creatively made up by some nanny mod.

There is a poster that made a return from the past, on this thread. I couldn't disagree more with a lot of their old posts. I dislike the persona, I dislike many of their opinions. I dislike their propensity to make wild assumptions based on their biased and offensive views and attack others for it. To say the putz does NOT give me the warm fuzzies is an understatement. BUT....... I do see value in their participation here.
#1 Many people DO enjoy what they write.
#2 For being a putz, they do appear to be reasonably intelligent.
#3 It gives ME a way to grow. I like finding things offensive because I can look at why, what there is within me that causes me to be annoyed they exist and speak, and deal with it.
#4 I am an adult and I do have the ability to avoid reading the writing of putzes.
#5 This is a free site, available even to people I happen not to like.....and that is a good thing. I don't like a lot of people. That's no reason for them to not have the same rights and freedoms I do. That's the mindset of the society I want to live in.

It is my perception, that moderation here is biased. If a person does not share a mindset that is somewhat aligned with that of current moderation, or at the very least kisses ass with those that have that mindset, they are scrutinized more heavily than the posts that are more closely aligned with the moderators personal views. That is why I have understood, at times, the displeasure of some male dominant posters. I don't necessarily agree with it, and I certainly don't agree with the alternate some of them would have preferred, but I understand it. I also understand the mindset of the submissive women that champion them. It is nearly impossible for many, to remove a personal relationship philosophy from all interactions with others. Especially when you have people in power, who's actions only serve to emphasize it, in their point of view. We had a stellar example of that earlier in this thread.

Long story short, if the powers that be want more meaty threads they are going to have to reassess how they deal with the posters that have the ability to create them, and post on those threads. Intelligent people do NOT enjoy having their work evaporated at the whim of a temperamental system.

As for the pixel issue. I can only speak for myself. Many of the posters here are really just pixels to ME. Though they are more to others. It's simply based on what I value. What a poster offers MY brain for stimulation. Some posters can disappear and I never realize it at all. Others I would miss almost immediately. Saying that does not negate the value of any individual poster as a human being. It's just reality.




VideoAdminChi -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/9/2013 5:52:17 AM)

I've been moderating for six months now...when is the ass kissing going to start? Is there a probation period for ass kissing?




jlf1961 -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/9/2013 5:56:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminChi

I've been moderating for six months now...when is the ass kissing going to start? Is there a probation period for ass kissing?



First you have to give each of the members the winning lotto numbers for the next 10 drawings, and also bake chocolate chip cookies for all of us.




VideoAdminChi -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/9/2013 6:02:50 AM)

Dammit, VAA didn't cover that!




NuevaVida -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/9/2013 7:20:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

I believe what many people are expressing though, is that they don't feel inclined to post more meaty, thought provoking threads.........because of the way their efforts are treated. If a person puts a lot of effort of any sort into writing something, only to have it shit all over (as they perceive it...) that will very likely cause them to avoid doing so again. I can't honestly say I've ever felt that way, at least not that I can remember. BUT, that is the gist of what I am reading from many. And some of that 'many' are posters whom I've enjoyed immensely. Some of whom, actually post intelligent, and thought provoking shit!

Well, I can relate to this, actually. Last week there was a thread I posted on - by AthenaSurrenders, I think - about setting someone up to fail. I wrote a pretty lengthy post in it. A couple of days later I came back to the boards and it was gone. I was very annoyed about that and felt like my time and effort were all for naught. I considered Cmailing the mods to ask why, but never did. My initial thought was OK, the last time I complained about a thread being pulled (this one) I was told I shouldn't have jump to conclusions and should give the benefit of the doubt. So I thought maybe it was pulled to clean it up because maybe it got ugly. So I waited but it never came back. Then I felt annoyed.

I know this would create more work for the mods but I'm wondering if there can be a section here which lists pulled threads and why they were pulled, so we're not coming back here looking for something we thought we posted meatiness too, and it's poofed. So yes, I see what you're saying, since one of my first reactions was to not put effort into my posts anymore if they're just going to vanish. It was an initial, emotional reaction, which has obviously quelled a bit since here I am posting to you. [;)]

quote:


I know that my tastes are not those of everyone. I would rather read stuff I perceive as biased and offensive, but intelligently written, than a bunch of mindless fluff that is all polite and totally within every possible imagined boundary of TOS, whether it be written or creatively made up by some nanny mod.

There is a poster that made a return from the past, on this thread. I couldn't disagree more with a lot of their old posts. I dislike the persona, I dislike many of their opinions. I dislike their propensity to make wild assumptions based on their biased and offensive views and attack others for it. To say the putz does NOT give me the warm fuzzies is an understatement. BUT....... I do see value in their participation here.
#1 Many people DO enjoy what they write.
#2 For being a putz, they do appear to be reasonably intelligent.
#3 It gives ME a way to grow. I like finding things offensive because I can look at why, what there is within me that causes me to be annoyed they exist and speak, and deal with it.
#4 I am an adult and I do have the ability to avoid reading the writing of putzes.
#5 This is a free site, available even to people I happen not to like.....and that is a good thing. I don't like a lot of people. That's no reason for them to not have the same rights and freedoms I do. That's the mindset of the society I want to live in.


I share your sentiment here, other than I *do* like a lot of people. I feel the same as the above about a poster or two, and yet I enjoy reading what they have to say for those same reasons. I don't mind feeling offended by *opinions* - I've found that when I do, it means I need to examine something within myself, and I do grow from that. What *I* personally do mind is having to sift through the fuck you's and the name calling and the (what I feel) inability to have a reasonable debate/disagreement/discourse. Look at how Hill and tazzy went back and forth for pages. I found it fascinating. They both brought up good points, I disagreed AND agreed with both of them at times, and I was impressed by their tenacity to not only continuing their sparring but to do so without letting it decline too far into the lobbing of insults.

That's MY idea of being an adult. When a thread devolves to pages of mud slinging, that's when I think "This is not adult behavior" and I completely lose interest. And yes, I *have* reported threads like that in the past because I find it totally annoying to open up what I think could be an awesome and meaty topic, only to have to sift through pages and pages of "fuck you" "no fuck YOU" (or anything similar). That's the kind of shit that makes ME stop posting here.

I don't prefer everyone get along and sing kumbaya here all day - that would be horribly boring. But it's my personal preference that debates can occur in an adult-like manner, so others don't feel the need to call in the "nanny" as has been referenced here. Remember the old adage our parents used to tell us (at least mine did, anyway)? "If you want to be treated like an adult, then act like one." To me, that applies to the debates here, the disagreements, and pages of posts about how pretty someone's hair is.

quote:


It is my perception, that moderation here is biased. If a person does not share a mindset that is somewhat aligned with that of current moderation, or at the very least kisses ass with those that have that mindset, they are scrutinized more heavily than the posts that are more closely aligned with the moderators personal views. That is why I have understood, at times, the displeasure of some male dominant posters. I don't necessarily agree with it, and I certainly don't agree with the alternate some of them would have preferred, but I understand it. I also understand the mindset of the submissive women that champion them. It is nearly impossible for many, to remove a personal relationship philosophy from all interactions with others. Especially when you have people in power, who's actions only serve to emphasize it, in their point of view. We had a stellar example of that earlier in this thread.


Of course moderation is biased; it's being handled by people. And right now it appears it's only being handled by two people (at least i only see two mods posting anymore). As for me, I agree with some of the moderation and disagree with some of it. I don't consider myself an ass kisser, I just think hey we're all humans on this planet doing the best we can and to give each other a break. I would never have the time it takes to freely volunteer at moderating, so I appreciate the time that they spend, even if I disagree (and as you probably know, I heavily disagreed during the sock-puppet days).

quote:


Long story short, if the powers that be want more meaty threads they are going to have to reassess how they deal with the posters that have the ability to create them, and post on those threads. Intelligent people do NOT enjoy having their work evaporated at the whim of a temperamental system.

Agreed.

quote:


As for the pixel issue. I can only speak for myself. Many of the posters here are really just pixels to ME. Though they are more to others. It's simply based on what I value. What a poster offers MY brain for stimulation. Some posters can disappear and I never realize it at all. Others I would miss almost immediately. Saying that does not negate the value of any individual poster as a human being. It's just reality.

Expressing it the way you just did does not negate their value, but I do feel a broad statement of "Most of you are just pixels on a screen" kind of does. I know when I've seen you say that, it's made me think twice about ever replying to one of your posts because why bother, if it's just pixels you don't care about? I haven't been personally offended by it, but it made me consider shrugging you off as someone not to bother with. I'm glad I didn't, because I'm rather liking this discourse and maybe others might get something out of it, but I personally don't like to spend a lot of energy on someone who equates me to a dot. Now I know you have never said "NV I think you're a dot" (which would be better than a dolt, I suppose), so I don't take your "pixels" comment to heart, but in a general sense, if I see someone referencing "most of you" then I might automatically lump myself into the majority there - I mean, *I* think I'm pretty damn special but I don't expect the rest of the world to. [;)]

For what it's worth, I am appreciating this conversation, so thank you for sharing your thoughts on the topic.

From one cool dot to another. [8D]




LaTigresse -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/9/2013 7:42:00 AM)

Something I thought of after I wrote the last post but didn't have the time to come back and write.

Just some ideas.

I think everyone gets the need for some moderation. For legal purposes if nothing else.

One thing I know has stopped me from posting on threads that have a few people getting rambunctious but over all, isn't a bad thread. I can't count how many times I've taken the time to write a fairly long, well thought out post, only to hit okay and find out that the thread has been locked or just plain disappeared. That's bullshit.

My suggestion, simply put the offenders on [awaiting approval], then write a post explaining that poster A, B, C was getting little bit too passionate and needs some time to cool off. Only remove the stuff that is in fact ILLEGAL, and leave the rest so that anyone that sees the 'cool off' post can understand WHY the decision was made to chill those posters out. No thread continuity is ruined. The reason for the time out is obvious to everyone and the posters that were getting out of hand are chilling.

It's obvious that many people that post on this side don't even bother logging into the other side. I know I wouldn't have a clue if I have gold mail. If the explanation for the moderation is clearly posted in the thread with the names of the persons involved, there are no questions and even if there are, people can email the mod that posts the explanation.




needlesandpins -> RE: The decline of collarme (1/9/2013 8:02:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Something I thought of after I wrote the last post but didn't have the time to come back and write.

Just some ideas.

I think everyone gets the need for some moderation. For legal purposes if nothing else.

One thing I know has stopped me from posting on threads that have a few people getting rambunctious but over all, isn't a bad thread. I can't count how many times I've taken the time to write a fairly long, well thought out post, only to hit okay and find out that the thread has been locked or just plain disappeared. That's bullshit.

My suggestion, simply put the offenders on [awaiting approval], then write a post explaining that poster A, B, C was getting little bit too passionate and needs some time to cool off. Only remove the stuff that is in fact ILLEGAL, and leave the rest so that anyone that sees the 'cool off' post can understand WHY the decision was made to chill those posters out. No thread continuity is ruined. The reason for the time out is obvious to everyone and the posters that were getting out of hand are chilling.

It's obvious that many people that post on this side don't even bother logging into the other side. I know I wouldn't have a clue if I have gold mail. If the explanation for the moderation is clearly posted in the thread with the names of the persons involved, there are no questions and even if there are, people can email the mod that posts the explanation.


some excellent posting above and here LaT!

i too have thought twice about posting because of the part i've bolded. case in point with a thread recently in the general bdsm section. i was asked a question personally by the op. i spent ages writing out my reply that was rather lengthy for her, only to hit ok and find it had been locked. the mod admitted that she hadn't gone back to it due to ill health. now to my mind if you are too ill to do a full job don't start it in the first place. all that needed doing was one post at the most pulling, and even that could have been left as it was. it was hardly anything at all, and certainly didn't need the thread locking.

now that's bad enough, but to come back and admit you screwed up, but then do naff all about it just shows to me you are not worthy of the job. as far as i know the thread, which was answering the op nicely, has stayed locked.

because of the inconsistency of moderation i'm alway wondering whether it's worth replying incase it all just gets pulled anyway. i'm all up for sweet and fluffy, but we have threads just for that. i want to freely converce, even if it gets heated.

needles




Page: <<   < prev  43 44 [45] 46 47   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625