LookieNoNookie
Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aswad Is, by mass-energy equivalence, the thermal energy of an object part of its effective gravitational mass? Or, phrased differently, does the gravitation of an object depend in part on its heat? The intuitive answer seems to be yes, but IANAP. IWYW, — Aswad. Interesting that you pose that.... First, mass energy equivalence is only transposed by virtue of the heat deflection that is dispersed by its own tangent (which can, as most might know, be expressed by no less than X= 7/23 plus the obvious [23/11th at gravity (assuming gravity at 1.71375) less the assumptions of least path, over dynamic reference] belying of course all the obvious assumptions as to gain on the 4th pull...plus the second dynamic. Which is of course to say....you can't get there without doing the gravitational expressions which are by default, only in their (obvious) stack. I think that's fairly clear (to most). So, that being said, it's then more than prescient....you can't have one without the other. I believe I've expressed the obvious here. To try and differentiate between the two (clear) poles is really a waste of time and frankly....a portent to what finally results.
< Message edited by LookieNoNookie -- 1/3/2013 6:28:07 PM >
|