DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: muhly22222 Unfortunately, this is small towns in rural Ohio for you, especially when those small towns are competing for the state title in football every year. I know, I'm from one myself. I never heard of classmates getting away (or committing) anything even approaching this, but it wasn't uncommon for DUIs or drug charges to disappear. While the kids certainly have the entirety of the blame on them for committing these despicable acts, I'm much more disturbed by the adults. The football coach's role isn't all that surprising, and small-town sheriffs are frequently influenced by strong athletic records. I'm most disturbed, though, by the role the prosecutor played. That might just be because I'm an attorney myself, and believe in standards of behavior and morality (I know...how naive). But her constant ignorance of the rule of law is utterly shocking. That being said, I do have some problems with that article. First, don't download the email files. If you do, you could be committing a felony - possession of child pornography. There are supposedly pornographic images of girls who appear to be underage. No matter what your reason for downloading the files is, you are committing a crime if they are of underage girls. Second, when the sheriff said that it is not a crime to be at the parties, he was right, in contrast to what the article said. Merely knowing that a crime is being committed and doing nothing to stop it (including informing the authorities) is not a crime itself, unless the person not acting had a special relationship with one of the parties (child-parent, patient-caretaker, etc.). That probably wouldn't exist between the kids at the parties and the victim. However, people who had their pictures taken with the victim or otherwise encouraged their behavior (cheering them on, for instance) could be guilty as accomplices. Merely being there and watching does not lead to criminal liability, though. Wouldn't the host of the party, or at least the child who resided in the house the party was held at, have a responsibility that extended to reporting a crime being commited at the party? Isn't that the theory under which hosts can be held liable for DUI accidents commited by guests at the party?
|