jlf1961 -> RE: Why people support higher capacity magazines (1/11/2013 9:41:06 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Here is my problem with high cap magazines, anything over ten rounds anyway. Coming from my military and law enforcement careers, first it as a sniper, one shot, one kill. As a cop, if you dont hit them with the first two or three rounds, what the hell makes you think you are going to have better luck with the remaining 27? Unless you are shooting into a pack of wild hogs, thirty round mags dont mean you are going to hit your target. I had a partner as a cop, big guy, 6'9" and about 300-320. I saw him take a .38 in the chest and the damn bullet lodged between two ribs. He promptly slapped the shit out of the druggie that shot him for ruining a new tailored shirt. IMO a 38 has very little stopping power, a .357 is much better. But I hit a 300 pound wild hog with my 50 desert eagle and stopped that sucker in mid stride. So if your home is being invaded by a 300 pound wild hog, a 50 cal is better than a 38. quote:
Look. . . wimminz are smaller. Colt made us equal. And the ammo just gets better. One this problem, might I suggest miracle grow? my problems with high capacity magazines is that they encourage spray and pray of course if they are shooting at me thats how I want them to do it, not like you would that said Aylee has a point and as I said earlier better to have them and not need them than to need them and not have them I own a couple of AR framed rifles in .308, and only time I use high cap mags outside of the range is when I am dealing with wild hogs. For the first two or three minutes they stay bunched, then they take off in all directions. I have one of Red Jacket's hog guns on order, cant wait for it to get here.
|
|
|
|