JeffBC -> RE: Help explaining my needs as a submissive (1/14/2013 3:32:11 PM)
|
Well, since I appear to be on the right track I'll elaborate a bit. As you describe him, I appear to be a lot like your boyfriend. I was "alpha" (for lack of a better word -- generally dominant in my life outside my relationships) but had never considered an unequal power arrangement in my marriage. So when that did come up, I had a lot of predictable sorts of feelings about it. Here's the recap of several questions and answers that I had over time. Carol should not have to obey me. That's correct. And she doesn't HAVE to. She wants to. OK then, but I love her with or without obeying. She shouldn't feel like she needs to obey in order for me to love her. Again, she doesn't. She wants to. It's somehow "wrong" for me to be the boss in the marriage. Really? Why? I've led lots of people over lots of years and generally I thought of that as a positive experience for them. Why should my leadership at home be negative? Carol should be able to lead herself. A submissive personality is not a "defective dominant". If I claim to love her, I need to see her for who SHE is, not as a broken reflection of who I am. Besides, she CAN lead herself. That's just not what works best for her. She shouldn't have to give so much to please the man she loves. Again, not only does she not HAVE to, but since when did pleasing the person you claim to love become an unworthy goal? I myself will go to pretty great lengths to please Carol. All of this stuff took years for me to settle into. Over time I led more and more. She submitted more and more. Good things happened as a result of all that. The cycle continues. If your BF is vanilla, then my advice is ditch all the BDSM stuff because it comes with a lot of baggage. Carol is not the "poor oppressed slave girl". She's a competent and capable adult who, in her own words, "prefers to defer." Likewise, I "prefer to lead". Given a couple with those two preferences isn't it sort of obvious how the team ought to be structured? You don't need any BDSM-isms and you don't need the baggage. All you need is a desire to please each other, behave as a team, and recognize your partner for who they truly are. If he doesn't like you kneeling then don't kneel. If he doesn't like you wearing a collar then don't wear a collar. If his idea of "dominance" is, like mine, on the softer side then yield gracefully and sans brattiness. In point of fact, as Carol so clearly demonstrated to me, YOU are the one who controls whether you submit or not. He has no vote in the matter at all unless he wants to end the relationship entirely. Witness this little fragment from a moment when I was trying to release Carol. Her: Master, how may I serve you today? Me: Well mine, for starters you can stop calling me master and stop trying to serve me. Her: <thinks a moment> Good morning honey. What do you want to do today? Me: <face palm> See what I mean? You can't make someone not submit. Heck, it's even pointless to give that command since if you're in the mode of giving commands then I guess you're in the leadership slot, eh? The only thing that sounds like a potential problem to me in your story is this bit here: but I do need that constant pressing feeling of being owned and subjugated in order to relax and be calm. Generally when I hear stuff like that I cringe because what it really means is, "I have a fantasy that I want you to make real." It has NOTHING to do with submission. Submission would be following HIS lead and being 'owned' or not as HE sees fit. I have to tell you that if Carol desired to be "subjugated" she'd be needing new husband. That's one of those BDSM-isms with baggage that I just don't need or want. I'm happy to step up and take charge as a leadership slot. I'm not particularly interested in subjugating anyone -- at least not anyone I love. In my opinion, your feeling of being "owned" ought to derive from how well your meeting HIS needs not the other way around. Carol, in the above story, has no particular need to be owned or subjugated. Her entire objective is simply "to make the guy she loves as happy as she can manage." But as long as I preferred owning her then she refused to stop submitting. I could have gotten her to stop submitting (or at least a good simulation of that) simply by saying "I don't want to own you any more". That wasn't the actual case though.
|
|
|
|