|
xssve -> RE: Does whipping tits differ greatly to the woman than whipping buns? (2/27/2013 8:30:08 AM)
|
I should not think trauma to breast tissue is any more likely to lead to cancer than trauma to any other kind of tissue.
I think this belief might signal a more emotional response to breasts, which evoke "tender" feelings for lack of a more scientific description: i.e., the average male has a much different response to the fatty tissues of the female breasts than we have to fatty deposits anywhere else, i.e., we are not likely to hold our breath when your belly falls out from under your blouse whereas we will likely go into a reverie, at bare minimum, when your breast fall out of same.
I mean this is true even for me and I'm pretty much a leg and ass man.
And also for me, this appears to hold true even when your breasts are small to virtually nonexistent, any display of décolletage evokes roughly the same emotional response.
At the same time, I believe much of that is the result of art on the part of the revealer, i.e., a bunch of Dykes schlepping around bare breasted does not necessarily evoke the same effect as another woman might get from behind the complete concealment of a thick turtleneck sweater.
|
|
|
|
