quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

HAHHAHHAHAH, typical
Congrats Mr President, you are into your second term, and they are still frothing!!!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Don't fret. I am sure someone will be along soon not only to explain why it's ok but to give numerous example of someone else doing it first. It seems the only time we are supposed to worry about a politician saying one thing and doing another is when they are on the right side of the fence. If we are really lucky one poster might even get the chance to call him "the kenyan" for the hundreth time.

When thieves complain about thievery.....it looks pretty dumb.

When demonizers complain about being called names......it looks pretty dumb.

The Kenyan thing,is a dig at the stupidity of your party......

If you don`t like having it being pointed out.....perhaps you should find another leisure pastime...

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Don't fret. I am sure someone will be along soon not only to explain why it's ok but to give numerous example of someone else doing it first. It seems the only time we are supposed to worry about a politician saying one thing and doing another is when they are on the right side of the fence. If we are really lucky one poster might even get the chance to call him "the kenyan" for the hundreth time.

When thieves complain about thievery.....it looks pretty dumb.

When demonizers complain about being called names......it looks pretty dumb.

The Kenyan thing,is a dig at the stupidity of your party......

If you don`t like having it being pointed out.....perhaps you should find another leisure pastime...

I know why he constantly calls Obama "the kenyan". But what he fails to realize is it makes him look just as ignorant as anyone else who does it. For what ever reason they do it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Don't fret. I am sure someone will be along soon not only to explain why it's ok but to give numerous example of someone else doing it first. It seems the only time we are supposed to worry about a politician saying one thing and doing another is when they are on the right side of the fence. If we are really lucky one poster might even get the chance to call him "the kenyan" for the hundreth time.

When thieves complain about thievery.....it looks pretty dumb.

When demonizers complain about being called names......it looks pretty dumb.

The Kenyan thing,is a dig at the stupidity of your party......

If you don`t like having it being pointed out.....perhaps you should find another leisure pastime...

I know why he constantly calls Obama "the kenyan". But what he fails to realize is it makes him look just as ignorant as anyone else who does it. For what ever reason they do it.

Boi, please refrain from pointing out the shortcomings of fellow posters, they cannot help it that a large rock has a higher IQ.

And I am still pissed I did not get an invite and they are not going to have strippers and topless waitresses at the ball.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


Alas I didn't get an invite either. Maybe we should hold our own ball.[8D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

$170M spent to celebrate the ascension of a man who has spent the last four years demonizing the wealthy.

Amazing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim

quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

$170M spent to celebrate the ascension of a man who has spent the last four years demonizing the wealthy.

Amazing.

Moreover, a Marxist usurper who has pronounced the U.S. Constitution an inherantly flawed document and has spent the last four years dishonoring the oath he took to preserve, uphold, defend and protect it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
If it wasn't inherently flawed, why did they have to rush out at least 10 amendments to it immediately?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

If it wasn't inherently flawed, why did they have to rush out at least 10 amendments to it immediately?

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim

quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

$170M spent to celebrate the ascension of a man who has spent the last four years demonizing the wealthy.

Amazing.

Moreover, a Marxist usurper who has pronounced the U.S. Constitution an inherantly flawed document and has spent the last four years dishonoring the oath he took to preserve, uphold, defend and protect it.

Come on, Jim. If you point out that he's a socialist, that makes you a racist. Stop that!



Peace and comfort,



Michael

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, there slick, the guy that doesn't have much in the way of fact, tell us why he pronounced it inherently flawed, and show your work with CREDIBLE citation, not teabagger blogging.

If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

I hope they played the Star Wars emperor theme. [8D]

I believe "Hail to the Chief" is the customary song. I thought you be more concerned about the fried chicken and watermelon served at the dinner....

Now why would you bring up fried chicken and watermelon? Do you feel such generalizations are funny?

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
In the 2001 interview, Obama said:

If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.

I am not the koolaide gulper, its the birthers, the nazis, the corporate capitulists, the teabaggers, the neo-cons, the ignorati, the imbecila on the right.