Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Inaugaration 2013


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Inaugaration 2013 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/20/2013 8:43:29 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

HAHHAHHAHAH, typical
Congrats Mr President, you are into your second term, and they are still frothing!!!


I have seen a lot of presidents come and go and I can't think of one time where the losing side didn't piss and moan for the next four years. Sounds like business as usual.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/20/2013 8:45:36 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Don't fret. I am sure someone will be along soon not only to explain why it's ok but to give numerous example of someone else doing it first. It seems the only time we are supposed to worry about a politician saying one thing and doing another is when they are on the right side of the fence. If we are really lucky one poster might even get the chance to call him "the kenyan" for the hundreth time.



When thieves complain about thievery.....it looks pretty dumb.

When demonizers complain about being called names......it looks pretty dumb.

The Kenyan thing,is a dig at the stupidity of your party......

If you don`t like having it being pointed out.....perhaps you should find another leisure pastime...



I know why he constantly calls Obama "the kenyan". But what he fails to realize is it makes him look just as ignorant as anyone else who does it. For what ever reason they do it.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/20/2013 8:54:18 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Don't fret. I am sure someone will be along soon not only to explain why it's ok but to give numerous example of someone else doing it first. It seems the only time we are supposed to worry about a politician saying one thing and doing another is when they are on the right side of the fence. If we are really lucky one poster might even get the chance to call him "the kenyan" for the hundreth time.



When thieves complain about thievery.....it looks pretty dumb.

When demonizers complain about being called names......it looks pretty dumb.

The Kenyan thing,is a dig at the stupidity of your party......

If you don`t like having it being pointed out.....perhaps you should find another leisure pastime...



I know why he constantly calls Obama "the kenyan". But what he fails to realize is it makes him look just as ignorant as anyone else who does it. For what ever reason they do it.



Boi, please refrain from pointing out the shortcomings of fellow posters, they cannot help it that a large rock has a higher IQ.

And I am still pissed I did not get an invite and they are not going to have strippers and topless waitresses at the ball.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/20/2013 9:05:04 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Don't fret. I am sure someone will be along soon not only to explain why it's ok but to give numerous example of someone else doing it first. It seems the only time we are supposed to worry about a politician saying one thing and doing another is when they are on the right side of the fence. If we are really lucky one poster might even get the chance to call him "the kenyan" for the hundreth time.



When thieves complain about thievery.....it looks pretty dumb.

When demonizers complain about being called names......it looks pretty dumb.

The Kenyan thing,is a dig at the stupidity of your party......

If you don`t like having it being pointed out.....perhaps you should find another leisure pastime...



I know why he constantly calls Obama "the kenyan". But what he fails to realize is it makes him look just as ignorant as anyone else who does it. For what ever reason they do it.



Boi, please refrain from pointing out the shortcomings of fellow posters, they cannot help it that a large rock has a higher IQ.

And I am still pissed I did not get an invite and they are not going to have strippers and topless waitresses at the ball.


Alas I didn't get an invite either. Maybe we should hold our own ball.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/20/2013 9:07:45 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


Alas I didn't get an invite either. Maybe we should hold our own ball.


I got six bottles of 75 year old scotch, two of 100 proof soco, a bottle of bacardi 151, and a bottle of JD #7 and JD green label and Gentleman Jack, and a half bottle of chardonay left over from New Years.

There is one point I must add, have you gotten a good look at my pic? My looks gives babies nightmares. I have stopped shaving because the mirror broke when I looked in it.


< Message edited by jlf1961 -- 1/20/2013 9:08:54 PM >

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:06:11 AM   
DomYngBlk


Posts: 3316
Joined: 3/27/2006
Status: offline 		So celebrating that Democracy works isn't worthwhile?

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:13:41 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

$170M spent to celebrate the ascension of a man who has spent the last four years demonizing the wealthy.

Amazing.

Moreover, a Marxist usurper who has pronounced the U.S. Constitution an inherantly flawed document and has spent the last four years dishonoring the oath he took to preserve, uphold, defend and protect it.

(in reply to LizDeluxe)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:19:00 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		If it wasn't inherently flawed, why did they have to rush out at least 10 amendments to it immediately?



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:23:23 AM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

$170M spent to celebrate the ascension of a man who has spent the last four years demonizing the wealthy.

Amazing.

Moreover, a Marxist usurper who has pronounced the U.S. Constitution an inherantly flawed document and has spent the last four years dishonoring the oath he took to preserve, uphold, defend and protect it.


Come on, Jim. If you point out that he's a socialist, that makes you a racist. Stop that!



Peace and comfort,



Michael

_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:27:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		And pointing out stupid shit with no factual reality makes people look stupid, all of them. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:40:49 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
If it wasn't inherently flawed, why did they have to rush out at least 10 amendments to it immediately?


why is it that whenever anyone says so-and-so thinks the Constitution is flawed, it automatically goes back to the original, un-amended text? How is it that the Constitution as it stands right now, isn't the one that is being defended?



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:42:20 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Thats the entire point.   It is being defended.  It was and is inherently flawed.

I will point out that corporations are people.  That is flawed. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:44:22 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

If it wasn't inherently flawed, why did they have to rush out at least 10 amendments to it immediately?



Obviously you're either ignorant about why your lil boy pronounced it inherantly flawed or you refuse to acknowledge it.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:46:36 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		Well, there slick, the guy that doesn't have much in the way of fact, tell us why he pronounced it inherently flawed, and show your work with CREDIBLE citation, not teabagger blogging.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:46:57 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
quote:

ORIGINAL: LizDeluxe

$170M spent to celebrate the ascension of a man who has spent the last four years demonizing the wealthy.

Amazing.

Moreover, a Marxist usurper who has pronounced the U.S. Constitution an inherantly flawed document and has spent the last four years dishonoring the oath he took to preserve, uphold, defend and protect it.


Come on, Jim. If you point out that he's a socialist, that makes you a racist. Stop that!



Peace and comfort,



Michael

Yeah, if anyone points out he's anything other than the greatest thing since sliced bread, that's make them a racist.

(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:48:50 AM   
RacerJim


Posts: 1583
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, there slick, the guy that doesn't have much in the way of fact, tell us why he pronounced it inherently flawed, and show your work with CREDIBLE citation, not teabagger blogging.

Do your own research for once, instead of simply gulping down more Kool-Aid.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 7:50:54 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline 		In the 2001 interview, Obama said:


If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.

I am not the koolaide gulper, its the birthers, the nazis, the corporate capitulists, the teabaggers, the neo-cons, the ignorati, the imbecila on the right.    

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 1/21/2013 7:51:57 AM >

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 8:02:10 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline 		First of all, stating the opinion that Obama is a socialist does not make one a racist in my opinion. But that is just me, and my opinion and $2.75 will get you a bad cup of coffee at Starbucks.

Now, I dont agree that he is a socialist, because most of his proposals dont fall into the philosophy of socialism.

And the Obamacare flap is not really his fault, he told congress to come up with a health care reform bill, which he stated a few requirements he had, and then let a democrat controlled senate and democrat controlled house go to town. What they came up with was convoluted mess and he signed the damn thing, even though he did not get some of the stuff he wanted.

This does not make him a socialist. It makes him a democrat who does not stand up for what he believes in, tries to please all the people all the time, and in the process is a pretty sorry excuse for a leader.

I think that if he actually stood up and made a stand about things he says he wants, more people could respect him.

With the exception of lieing about a blow job in the oval office, Clinton had more respect from both sides than Obama does.

Yes I voted for him, only because I considered him the lesser of two evils.

If Joe Biden gets the nomination in 2016, depending on who he runs against, I may just vote republican.

In my opinion, what we need in 2016 is two passionate individuals to run for president who actually have the respect of both sides, but no history in politics, there are some republicans who fit the bill, as well as democrats.

This country is in dire need of a change, and no "party line" president is going to achieve that.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to RacerJim)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 8:02:34 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

I hope they played the Star Wars emperor theme.


I believe "Hail to the Chief" is the customary song. I thought you be more concerned about the fried chicken and watermelon served at the dinner....


Now why would you bring up fried chicken and watermelon? Do you feel such generalizations are funny?


No I was being sarcastic at Yachtie post.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Inaugaration 2013 - 1/21/2013 8:06:39 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
In the 2001 interview, Obama said:

If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.

I am not the koolaide gulper, its the birthers, the nazis, the corporate capitulists, the teabaggers, the neo-cons, the ignorati, the imbecila on the right.    


Really? Have you not read the preamble? Have you not read anything as to why the Constitution was needed?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Inaugaration 2013 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125