RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what

RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

juliaoceania -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 11:12:25 AM)
Ol Newty Boy not only divorced two wives for the "other woman", the last time he did it he left his wife on her death bed.. she was dying of cancer and he divorced her... what a sonofabitch... yes I judge that and if there was a hell I am sure he would find himself there...LOL

juliaoceania -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 11:14:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OedipusRexIt quote: ORIGINAL: masterrforu You liberals won't be happy till you're chained to a tree eatin your veggies while slinging bow and arrows at a fetus. Ahh, perhaps you're correct. However, it's worth pointing out that, without liberals there wouldn't be any trees to hug, your veggies would kill you with toxins, and your fully developed fetus wouldn't be worrying about arrows because he'd already be serving in some war of liberation in a country which just happens to sit on a bunch of oil. Good thread, by the way. Even taking into account the highly intellectualized argument of the quoted poster. Bill Clinton's ability and intellect were a threat to the GOP from the beginning. It didn't matter what he did or didn't do, they were always out to get him. Thanks for posting that reply...LOLOLOL I thought I would add he wouldn't get time and a half for over time, vacations, clean drinking water, or unemployment insurance.I am sure others can add to this.

OedipusRexIt -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 12:39:18 PM)
Wow. They're a bunch of hypocrites. I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you... ... not.

Level -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 3:36:55 PM)
quote: Quivver wrote: My guess is it had something to do with Lying... It sucks to be in a position where everyone judges you and your actions. But lying sure indicates and lack of Honor in my book. And although I'm Republican I'm not tossing stones at only Bill. A lack of Honor is a lack of Honor no matter what clothes your wearing. quote: Chaingang wrote: I understand what Quivver is getting at because Republicans never lie. [8\|] They don't lie about motives, war, taxes, investments, prejudice - no, they sure don't. They just hire PR firms with taxpayer money and get them to do their dirty work for them! I don't think she's saying Republicans never lie, and if that's what anyone got from her post, I think they don't understand. Maybe I misread your response.

MistressLorelei -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 7:40:11 PM)
Marriage is personal, religion is personal... there are many different people to marry; many different types of relationships to be had; many different religions to practice, and many versions of 'God'. There is no 'correct' way to marry, and no 'correct' religion to practice... and these reasons are why religion (Theocracy is a scary thing) and personal relationships with chosen partner(s) should be separate from government. I would rather a politician screw whomever he chooses in the bedroom/office with his sexual practices, than screw the entire country with his political practices.

Lordandmaster -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 8:19:53 PM)
You know that the divorce rate in red states is higher than in blue states, right? The difference is pretty substantial, if I remember correctly. (Only in the U.S. is the right wing called "red.")

pahunkboy -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 9:31:53 PM)
I forgive Bill.

cloudboy -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 9:52:52 PM)
That would seem to fit with the mentality of black and white thinking where everything is right and wrong, good and evil, and us and them. Good point about the red states.

MistressLorelei -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 10:00:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster You know that the divorce rate in red states is higher than in blue states, right? The difference is pretty substantial, if I remember correctly. (Only in the U.S. is the right wing called "red.") Wait, I think "Red wings" is a whole other topic completely. Unless... more red wings would keep more marriages alive? Hmmm....

Craftsman -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 10:14:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: meatcleaver This was emailed to me by a friend. Now I'm wondering what the Republicans had against the Clinton's marriage. <some snippage> Ronald Reagan - divorced the mother of two of his children to marry Nancy Reagan, who bore him a daughter only 7 months after the marriage. <more snippage> You are aware, I would presume, that Ronald Reagan was, at that time, a very staunch Democrat. He did not switch party affiliation until 1962 and did not become actively Republican until he supported Barry Goldwater in 1964 quote: from http://alastair.familydallas.com/govalpha.html#Reagan Once a liberal Democrat, Reagan became active in Republican politics, supporting Barry Goldwater for president in 1964. After a brief "retirement" in the 1970s, Reagan won a landslide victory in 1980 to become the first California governor to become President of the United States. According to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Library site, it was in the fall of 1962 that Ronald Reagan changed is political affiliation from Democrat to Republican. By then, Maureen had been long born (January 4, 1941), and so was the son that was adopted, Michael (March 14, 1945). It seems that Ronald Reagan married, screwed and divorced Jane Wyman as a Liberal Democrat. He screwed the State of California higher education as 33rd Governor and the country at large, by some peoples' standards, as the 40th President of these here United States. Never mind that he was influential in tearing down the Berilin Wall, ending the Cold War, and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and being President during a time of high growth and economic expansion here 'at home'. Besides, I don't recall anyone having anything against the Contract of Marriage between William Jefferson Clinton and Hillary Diane Rodham. The furor, as I understand it, involves Mr. Clinton's oral-genital activities with interns and other persons of female genotype and fenotype not a party to said contract of marriage.

NeedToUseYou -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/20/2006 11:36:20 PM)
quote: This was emailed to me by a friend. Now I'm wondering what the Republicans had against the Clinton's marriage. Hrmmmmm, when have republicans had anything against the clinton marriage? Is there a active campaign for the clintons to divorce? I've never heard anything about that. They had right or wrong a problem with him getting a blowjob from an intern and then lying about it. That has nothing to do with divorce as all of your examples reference. Do I care about clinton, No. But you frame your post around a false issue as in one that doesn't even exist.

HarryVanWinkle -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/21/2006 12:29:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MistressLorelei Wait, I think "Red wings" is a whole other topic completely. Unless... more red wings would keep more marriages alive? Hmmm.... <<<< Proud charter member of the Vast Red Wing Conspiracy.

meatcleaver -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/21/2006 2:17:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Craftsman Never mind that he was influential in tearing down the Berilin Wall, ending the Cold War, and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, and being President during a time of high growth and economic expansion here 'at home'. PJ O'Rourke said, if the CIA had any forsight they would have sent an agent to Moscow on a vacation and within fifteen minutes that agent would have realised the Russians couldn't organise a shopping trip, never mind a war. Catholics claimed the pope tore the wall down too. The East Germans claimed they tore it down which they literally did. The Poles claimed they fundementally killed off the USSR with their uprisings and Solidarity. The truth was the whole system was rotten and was rotting from inside out from the moment the regime was born. The arms race increased the rate of rot. The situation also required a man like Gorbachov who realised that reform not repression was the only way to save Russia from the Russians. Everyone likes to take the credit. If a liberal President was in power when the wall came down, no doubt engagement with the USSR would have been seen as the reason the wall came down. Reagan as always, was just a bit player and happened to be around when the wall was pulled down and claimed the credit. To stay on topic, he might have been a liberal when he got divorced but later he obviously had a revelation and realised he was a sinner. While everyones's views change through life and usually they become more conservative. It apears Reagan had a revelation of quantum leap proportions. That always makes me suspect a man looking for the half chance. He still got divorced. I could be wrong but he never struck me as the type to change his mind through intellectual thought.

Level -> RE: Sanctity Of Marriage?what (6/21/2006 3:18:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Craftsman Besides, I don't recall anyone having anything against the Contract of Marriage between William Jefferson Clinton and Hillary Diane Rodham. The furor, as I understand it, involves Mr. Clinton's oral-genital activities with interns and other persons of female genotype and fenotype not a party to said contract of marriage. And lying under oath. That keeps being left out lol. Having said that, it never should have gotten to the point of him being under oath, I don't think.

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125