|
descrite -> RE: Hardly not to notice some flaws of site... (2/7/2013 6:54:06 PM)
|
quote:
And CM, unlike Fetlife, doesn't allow for heteroflexible and homoflexible listings. If they did, it would be much more specific.
And yet, on both sites, and on OKC, I have run across women who claim to be "bi," but then state that they only have sex within committed relationships...and when I ask how many committed relationships they have had with other women, "zero" is often the response.
There is some kind of cognitive dissonance going on there, and it's not OPer's.
Let's put it this way:
- If a woman fucks everyone, she's bi.
- If a woman fucks only men, she's straight.
- If a woman fucks only men, but eats a little box now and then, she's still straight, and labeling herself "bi" is just utter crap.
- Suck one cock; cocksucker for life.
It's good to have a taxonomy.
OPer also had a good point about fakes, and it's been made here many times: there are more fakes, per capita-profile, on this site than on comparable sites. I don't know what those sites are doing right or CM is doing wrong, but it's simply a fact.
The thing with the pix in a gallery, and portraying yourself...if your pix depict what someone should expect when meeting you, they served the purpose. I have met at least one sub who posted pix that looked NOTHING like her...and when we met, I was disgusted-- not so much by her appearance, but in utter bafflement at what she was trying to accomplish. Did she think I wasn't going to notice she was someone who didn't look a thing like what I was expecting/wanted? What goes through someone's head when they do that? What do they think they will achieve?
"Well, this guy is looking for a six-foot albino redhead...but he won't mind if I'm a squat brunette Polynesian."
[????]
|
|
|
|
