Good for the goose as well as the gander?

Good for the goose as well as the gander? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

DOM68005 -> Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:13:30 AM)
I am of the male species. I have read enough posts and profiles to know the female of the species prefer not to see a picture of the male third leg. Many post in their profiles that doing so will get that email reply deleted or dropped into the bulk file. Why is it then that females by a large margin put their front lower bits in many profiles and pictures?

MsLadySue -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:16:06 AM)
Probably because men are visual creatures.

LadyPact -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:17:43 AM)
The only way not to include My front lower bits would be to have all of My shots from the neck up. Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two.

TheLilSquaw -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:18:26 AM)
Well if you have read posts on this forum. You would know and understand that like anything it is based on personal preference. As long as the picture isn't a violation of the TOS. There are men and women that like nude pics, some that don't. Some that like cleavage shots, some that don't. Some that like foot pics, some that don't. Eh... you can't please everyone. As long as you stay within the TOS, are true to yourself, and understand everything has consequences. Btw... the search feature is your friend. There are a few recent posts regarding Naked and nude photos.

LaTigresse -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:21:27 AM)
READ! http://www.collarchat.com/m_4367666/tm.htm http://www.collarchat.com/m_4366576/tm.htm

DarkSteven -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:21:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DOM68005 I am of the male species. I have read enough posts and profiles to know the female of the species prefer not to see a picture of the male third leg. Many post in their profiles that doing so will get that email reply deleted or dropped into the bulk file. Why is it then that females by a large margin put their front lower bits in many profiles and pictures? Um. By my estimate, I'd say that maybe 1% or less show their vagina pics on collarme. What is this "large margin" you speak of?

littlewonder -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:25:18 AM)
Not all of us do. The same type of men who put that in are the same type of women who have those as well. Those of us who say we don't want to see it though are the ones you will see no bits pictures.

Level -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:35:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact The only way not to include My front lower bits would be to have all of My shots from the neck up. Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two. You're absolutely right LP, but would you agree that both genitalia and breasts sexualize a pic?

lizi -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:49:46 AM)
In the case of women putting out nude pics for men, well that would be smart marketing now wouldn't it? Men generally like to see nudity. Women don't, men don't always make the transfer over from what they prefer, to understanding what their intended market would prefer. So a women advertising herself to a man by using nude bait is using bait which would probably get her a response from a large percent of men out there.

Baroana -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:51:23 AM)
I don't put any lower front bits in my pictures. I don't know who does, but I suspect they are men posing as women. Also, women know what attracts men. Pornographic photography is certainly not a goose and gander situation.

Level -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 11:55:03 AM)
Baroana, you hit on a good one, the males posing as female.

hlen5 -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:00:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Level quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact The only way not to include My front lower bits would be to have all of My shots from the neck up. Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two. You're absolutely right LP, but would you agree that both genitalia and breasts sexualize a pic? I would say in our culture women's breasts are hyper-sexualized. Some people are uncomfortable with discreet breast-feeding, for goodness' sake!

Level -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:08:03 PM)
You're right, my friend. They do "double duty", so t o speak, as both nutrient provider, and as objects of desire.

Subano -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:10:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two. Clearly breasts are secondary sexual characteristics (i.e., genitalia). And, you clearly realize that, despite what you wrote. There is a REASON that breasts develop at puberty - and it isn't only to feed a baby (as evidenced by all other mammals NOT developing permanent breasts unless/until lactating under hormonal influence, i.e., for a baby). There are many theories WHY humans have developed the breasts as a sexual characteristic, ranging from those I know (such as they replaced the buttocks when early hominids such as Homo erectus stood on two legs) to plenty, I'm sure, that I don't know. But, clearly LadyPact is mistaken, and she knows it (she just wants to believe it's not true).

EsotericLady -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:15:58 PM)
I don't believe he was talking breasts when he said front LOWER bits. quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact The only way not to include My front lower bits would be to have all of My shots from the neck up. Seriously, breasts are not genitalia. I do kind of laugh when men try to equate the two.

Cilicia -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:16:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lizi In the case of women putting out nude pics for men, well that would be smart marketing now wouldn't it? Men generally like to see nudity. Women don't, I think the women want their cake both ways. They want to attract using what men find attractive - but then they want to complain that men only see them for what they show. Men themselves aren't devoid of double standards, but keeping in tune with the OP's original question, women want to be seen for what men want but they themselves don't appear to want men to act the same way. Just another one of those gender differences that make us human beings.

xssve -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:16:21 PM)
It's well known that cleavage is capable of short circuiting the male brain. They are saying, with the latest cockshot protest, that this is not working similarly for them, you'll have to come up with something else.

Level -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:16:56 PM)
I think genitalia means the reproductive organs, so she is correct.

EsotericLady -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:18:15 PM)
What photos are you looking at, DarkSteven? LOL quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven quote: ORIGINAL: DOM68005 I am of the male species. I have read enough posts and profiles to know the female of the species prefer not to see a picture of the male third leg. Many post in their profiles that doing so will get that email reply deleted or dropped into the bulk file. Why is it then that females by a large margin put their front lower bits in many profiles and pictures? Um. By my estimate, I'd say that maybe 1% or less show their vagina pics on collarme. What is this "large margin" you speak of?

pompeii -> RE: Good for the goose as well as the gander? (2/10/2013 12:20:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DOM68005 I am of the male species. I have read enough posts and profiles to know the female of the species prefer not to see a picture of the male third leg. Many post in their profiles that doing so will get that email reply deleted or dropped into the bulk file. Why is it then that females by a large margin put their front lower bits in many profiles and pictures? As another male of the species, I am confused which 'bits' you refer to. Reading this thread, it seems breasts popped up - but lower bits would be the kitty area. Would the OP clarify if the bits he speaks of are the breasts or the vagina?

Page: [1] 2 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875