RE: Real Queens need money? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


OsideGirl -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 8:29:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Peescojizz

Do your research kid, or you aren't slave material


Do your research.

You're presenting a very one sided view of what you think BDSM D/s is and you're just pimping your own agenda. The reality is that many female Dominants do not require tribute or money, they just require sincere service.




MsLadySue -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 8:38:14 AM)

Give me a break! That may be true in your mind but many will disagree.




punishmentdsrvd -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 8:54:55 AM)

Since you bring up history, and are not speaking of just BDSM, then,you are talking about Queens as in actual female people who are involved in the operation of government.

If you've gotten that far in your thinking, then, get a little further. It's tax time in America, is it not? And, them without even a real Queen to support.

All governments require money from their citizens. Slaves are a means of making money for the person who owns them, through their labor for that person or by their being rented out to perform labor for others and their owner, in either case, reaping the benefit that stems from their labor.

Only the extremely rich, who have already exploited slaves and/or other persons, have the "need" for slaves who are more for pleasure and who have their actual needs paid for by their owners without expectation of repayment through garnering income for the house.

Most of us are not extremely rich, and dominants are not prone to wishing to be used by silly little boys and girls who think they can have their cake and eat it to, and yet still consider themselves slaves.

I don't require that a slave give me money. I require that a slave at the very least costs me nothing and saves me money through their labors. If they can do that, without spending money, I find them useful to that extent. Though, i do have a sincere problem with slaves who think that they can be owned by me and live in a nicer house, with better food, better clothes, never humbling themselves and always putting their needs and desires above my own.

In that sense, as a "real Queen", in the BDSM world, I do require money. The money, though, is a tool that promotes humility in the slave and is a way of showing that they have me in their thoughts. A slave should want his or her owner to be comfortable, healthy, and to feel adored. If that slave is a miserly git who only views their owner as a source of entertainment, then, they are not a slave, but a player, and players should pay for their pleasure; whereas, slaves, they should willingly give, within reason.




MAINEiacMISTRESS -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 9:37:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: punishmentdsrvd

Most of us are not extremely rich, and dominants are not prone to wishing to be used by silly little boys and girls who think they can have their cake and eat it to, and yet still consider themselves slaves.

I don't require that a slave give me money. I require that a slave at the very least costs me nothing and saves me money through their labors. If they can do that, without spending money, I find them useful to that extent. Though, i do have a sincere problem with slaves who think that they can be owned by me and live in a nicer house, with better food, better clothes, never humbling themselves and always putting their needs and desires above my own.

In that sense, as a "real Queen", in the BDSM world, I do require money. The money, though, is a tool that promotes humility in the slave and is a way of showing that they have me in their thoughts. A slave should want his or her owner to be comfortable, healthy, and to feel adored. If that slave is a miserly git who only views their owner as a source of entertainment, then, they are not a slave, but a player, and players should pay for their pleasure; whereas, slaves, they should willingly give, within reason.


Actually, I AGREE with this. Too many subs expect the Dominant to do all the entertaining, cover the expenses of Play toys or maintaining a household, but then when it's expected for the sub to do his part by either giving sweat or financial contribution his response is WHA---???!!!!!

I expect sweat and blisters from My subs...but they also contribute financially to O/our activities so I'm not left paying for everything.

"Vanilla" people don't like freeloaders when they plan activities with friends, why should Dominants settle for freeloaders just for the sake of having someone to do D/s or BDSM with?

--MM




nonet -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 9:42:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MAINEiacMISTRESS



Actually, I AGREE with this. Too many subs expect the Dominant to do all the entertaining, cover the expenses of Play toys or maintaining a household, but then when it's expected for the sub to do his part by either giving sweat or financial contribution his response is WHA---???!!!!!

I expect sweat and blisters from My subs...but they also contribute financially to O/our activities so I'm not left paying for everything.

"Vanilla" people don't like freeloaders when they plan activities with friends, why should Dominants settle for freeloaders just for the sake of having someone to do D/s or BDSM with?

--MM

i just asked about who saying i am real but when start talk they start asking money. i told a lot time here i respect who saying they are fin domme first of all... relax [:)]




SeekingTrinity -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 9:43:05 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Peescojizz

It is a slaves duty to tribute his queen because it is an honor to be in her presence. [:@]


Wrong. Not all dominant females require tribute from their subs/slaves. I have never once accepted or looked for money from any subs/slaves who have served me and they still were able to interact with me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Peescojizz

You should want to tribute your mistress because she feeds you


Wrong again. Some of us are more interested on things like the interaction with our subs/slaves, rather than whether or not they fork over their money.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Peescojizz

Do your research kid, or you aren't slave material


Swing and a miss...strike three. Fail to see what makes you the supreme authority on whether or not someone is slave material. Sensing a pattern here? OP came here with a genuine question and seems sincere in wanting to learn. Cut them some slack.

Between this and dragging up threads today that are over 9 years old, its not been a very good morning, has it?

For you, OP...you have to keep in mind that this is a site that will attract all types. There are some I would consider quality financial dominants on here...and of course you will get the "fuck you, pay me" princesses who think that because they say they are dominant...the Pavlovian response by subs and slaves should be to instantly reach for their wallets. You will see all types here and its always best just to live and let live.




nonet -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 9:51:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingTrinity

quote:

ORIGINAL: Peescojizz

It is a slaves duty to tribute his queen because it is an honor to be in her presence. [:@]


Wrong. Not all dominant females require tribute from their subs/slaves. I have never once accepted or looked for money from any subs/slaves who have served me and they still were able to interact with me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Peescojizz

You should want to tribute your mistress because she feeds you


Wrong again. Some of us are more interested on things like the interaction with our subs/slaves, rather than whether or not they fork over their money.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Peescojizz

Do your research kid, or you aren't slave material


Swing and a miss...strike three. Fail to see what makes you the supreme authority on whether or not someone is slave material. Sensing a pattern here? OP came here with a genuine question and seems sincere in wanting to learn. Cut them some slack.

Between this and dragging up threads today that are over 9 years old, its not been a very good morning, has it?

For you, OP...you have to keep in mind that this is a site that will attract all types. There are some I would consider quality financial dominants on here...and of course you will get the "fuck you, pay me" princesses who think that because they say they are dominant...the Pavlovian response by subs and slaves should be to instantly reach for their wallets. You will see all types here and its always best just to live and let live.

[sm=agree.gif] absolutely





HarryVanWinkle -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 1:27:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: nonet

first of all sorry for my poor english. here we have bad schools anyway.

i read some profiles here and they saying i am real queen this is my kingdom etc. and after that i see they want our money. i just curious how real queen need money? i read all history and i never saw any poor queens. they all rich. and they feed their slaves. because slaves serve them.

so i ask that how real queen need money?


Real Queens need a LOT of money. Maintaining the palaces and gowns and carriages and all that stuff is EXPENSIVE.




nonet -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 1:38:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle



Real Queens need a LOT of money. Maintaining the palaces and gowns and carriages and all that stuff is EXPENSIVE.


with slave's money?




HarryVanWinkle -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 1:40:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: nonet


quote:

ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle



Real Queens need a LOT of money. Maintaining the palaces and gowns and carriages and all that stuff is EXPENSIVE.


with slave's money?


Well, Real Queens refer to them as "subjects." But, there are no real queens in my country, nor in yours, last time I checked.




nonet -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 1:42:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle





quote:

ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle




Well, Real Queens refer to them as "subjects." But, there are no real queens in my country, nor in yours, last time I checked.


true, thanks :)




MissAsylum -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 3:13:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MAINEiacMISTRESS


quote:

ORIGINAL: punishmentdsrvd

Most of us are not extremely rich, and dominants are not prone to wishing to be used by silly little boys and girls who think they can have their cake and eat it to, and yet still consider themselves slaves.

I don't require that a slave give me money. I require that a slave at the very least costs me nothing and saves me money through their labors. If they can do that, without spending money, I find them useful to that extent. Though, i do have a sincere problem with slaves who think that they can be owned by me and live in a nicer house, with better food, better clothes, never humbling themselves and always putting their needs and desires above my own.

In that sense, as a "real Queen", in the BDSM world, I do require money. The money, though, is a tool that promotes humility in the slave and is a way of showing that they have me in their thoughts. A slave should want his or her owner to be comfortable, healthy, and to feel adored. If that slave is a miserly git who only views their owner as a source of entertainment, then, they are not a slave, but a player, and players should pay for their pleasure; whereas, slaves, they should willingly give, within reason.


Actually, I AGREE with this. Too many subs expect the Dominant to do all the entertaining, cover the expenses of Play toys or maintaining a household, but then when it's expected for the sub to do his part by either giving sweat or financial contribution his response is WHA---???!!!!!

I expect sweat and blisters from My subs...but they also contribute financially to O/our activities so I'm not left paying for everything.

"Vanilla" people don't like freeloaders when they plan activities with friends, why should Dominants settle for freeloaders just for the sake of having someone to do D/s or BDSM with?

--MM


+1

At the very least, don't cost me anything.




theRose4U -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 4:29:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: HarryVanWinkle
Real Queens need a LOT of money. Maintaining the palaces and gowns and carriages and all that stuff is EXPENSIVE.

With slave's money?


In the UK & US they call them taxes...so unless someone comes up with a penis tax, you ARE NOT obligated to pay...but presents are a perk of the domme title





LafayetteLady -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/13/2013 7:09:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: punishmentdsrvd


....Though, i do have a sincere problem with slaves who think that they can be owned by me and live in a nicer house, with better food, better clothes, never humbling themselves and always putting their needs and desires above my own.....




I was taking your post somewhat seriously until you said this.




BlkTallFullfig -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/14/2013 12:53:39 AM)

They are not real queens.
Not all real queens are rich.

You're not trying to serve a "real" queen are you?
If you are a slave, you serve at her pleasure, not yours She sets the rules/parameters, and you follow. Just be sure you can afford to lose whatever you give to someone with whom you are NOT IN A REAL LIFE RELATIONSHIP WITH.
Good luck, M




nonet -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/14/2013 1:30:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BlkTallFullfig

They are not real queens.
Not all real queens are rich.

You're not trying to serve a "real" queen are you?
If you are a slave, you serve at her pleasure, not yours She sets the rules/parameters, and you follow. Just be sure you can afford to lose whatever you give to someone with whom you are NOT IN A REAL LIFE RELATIONSHIP WITH.
Good luck, M

of course i know it is impossible now. but i ask why they tell i am real queen and ask me money. it is confused,, thank you




searching4mysir -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/14/2013 7:08:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: nonet


quote:

ORIGINAL: BlkTallFullfig

They are not real queens.
Not all real queens are rich.

You're not trying to serve a "real" queen are you?
If you are a slave, you serve at her pleasure, not yours She sets the rules/parameters, and you follow. Just be sure you can afford to lose whatever you give to someone with whom you are NOT IN A REAL LIFE RELATIONSHIP WITH.
Good luck, M

of course i know it is impossible now. but i ask why they tell i am real queen and ask me money. it is confused,, thank you



If they use the term "goddess" or "queen", there is a very high chance that they are either fin or pro (whether or not they say so in their profile). By using that term they are telling you what they are. If that isn't your kink, move on to the next profile.




TheLilSquaw -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/14/2013 7:28:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MAINEiacMISTRESS


Actually, I AGREE with this. Too many subs expect the Dominant to do all the entertaining, cover the expenses of Play toys or maintaining a household, but then when it's expected for the sub to do his part by either giving sweat or financial contribution his response is WHA---???!!!!!

I expect sweat and blisters from My subs...but they also contribute financially to O/our activities so I'm not left paying for everything.

"Vanilla" people don't like freeloaders when they plan activities with friends, why should Dominants settle for freeloaders just for the sake of having someone to do D/s or BDSM with?

--MM


I agree 100%.

quote:


searching4mysir

If they use the term "goddess" or "queen", there is a very high chance that they are either fin or pro (whether or not they say so in their profile). By using that term they are telling you what they are. If that isn't your kink, move on to the next profile.


I don't agree.
I know many African American Domme's who refer to themselves as queens, not because of the reasons you stated but to THEM African American women are queens. Just like I see the nicks like NubianPrincess a lot.


quote:


ORIGINAL: nonet

of course i know it is impossible now. but i ask why they tell i am real queen and ask me money. it is confused,, thank you


The same reason someone calls them self a slave.
You are not a "slave" in the historical sense any more than they are "queens" in a historical sense. It is simply a title that they have given themselves because it fits them for what ever reason.





ServiceBoy89 -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/16/2013 12:06:08 PM)

tree rules

1.Never show your weaknesses to a woman(She will use it agains you)
2.Never give her any of your credit cards(If you want to have money don't do it)
3.Never trust her(they always betraid you)




TNDommeK -> RE: Real Queens need money? (2/16/2013 12:36:23 PM)

It's " three" not tree, and it's "against" not agains, and finally it's "betray".... There, fixed it for ya. [:)]





Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875