EligibleOwner
Posts: 51
Joined: 10/16/2009 From: London Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OsideGirl In all cases posted it was done by someone that they had met in real life. Not posting a picture is not a guarantee that someone you meet won't decide to "get even". There are other methods to provide evidence that it's you without a photo. You're right, obviously, on both counts. It'd be possible for someone who knew us to photograph any of us and set up a profile here in order to out us. In fact, I sometimes wonder whether some profiles aren't vindictive inventions (especially some supposedly of women, with a number of face photos, that read as though written by vengeful men). It's hard to know how you can protect yourself from that. But it's also worth remembering I think that most employers or decision-makers in this type of situation see it very, very simply (in my experience, anyway, of being involved in discussions about what X or Y worker is accused of having done). I've taken part in discussions about whether IP addresses show that X sent a certain message, for instance (in a recent instance I have in mind, this was a person "outed" as something non-BDSM, showing how the "smoking gun" message was a malicious fabrication). In spite of advice from techies, the non-tech decision-makers just became confused and uncertain. Probably wrongly. But where an e-mail or message appears to come from a certain person, or contains a photo, the tendency is towards naive belief in the accusation, even if the person denies it and explains how it might have been faked. At least, there can be a "residual suspicion" that can harm someone. Basically, what it seems to be on the surface, because of photos and real names, has in my experience ultimately the decisive point - even if it was clear that might well not have reflected reality. So I agree with you - but I still think obvious surface safety measures, like keeping your photo, real name and so on separate from a site like this are well worth taking.
|