Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004 Status: offline
|
So how can taking up arms against a foreign government be treason? If a government operates outside the purview of its charter then it is foreign. It means a coup took place and you were not aware. If a coup did not take place a grand jury they would be required to indict you for a fucking traffic ticket and ALL civil cases regardless would require a jury. The office of citizen would provide free legal services the same way any other office is treated in government. You would be able to declare your rights and the courts would be required to accept your declaration unless the opposing party could PROVE you injured them. As it stands all law is in favor of the organization called government. They are the people with the guns that force us out of our paid in full homes when we do not pay them rent regardless if we use their services or not. The are the same people that redistribute everyones wealth but the top 1%. The constitution itself points out that being in government is a position of profit. in fact you do not even have the 1st amendment right to EXERCISE your religion. All you have is the right to pray. LOL We have been taken over by a coup by stealth by some foreign agency, (most likely the banking cabal). Proof of this is that we no longer have our law and it has been taken over by corporate legislatures and courts. quote:
DUE PROCESS Although a person may invoke the right against self incrimination in a civil case in order to protect himself in a subsequent criminal action, an inference against the person's interest may be drawn as a matter of law based upon an implied admission that a truthful answer would tend to prove that the witness had committed the criminal act or what might constitute a criminal act. Molloy v. Molloy, 46 Wis. 2d 682, 176 N.W.2d 292. blam 5th is dead! quote:
Substantive due process requires that the state not deprive its citizens of life, liberty, or property without due process. Absent a special relationship, it does not impose an affirmative obligation upon the state to ensure the protection of those rights from a private actor, even when governmental aid may be necessary to secure a person's life, liberty, or property. Jones v. Dane County, 195 Wis. 2d 892, 537 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App. 1995), 92-0946. A procedural due process claim arises when there is a deprivation of a right without sufficient process. Generally a predeprivation hearing is required, but when a deprivation results from a random act of a state employee, the question becomes the adequacy of postdeprivation remedies. Jones v. Dane County, 195 Wis. 2d 892, 537 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App. 1995), 92-0946. back to the 5th 6th 7th 10th etc. all cases fail the standards AGREED UPON BY THE ORIGINAL 13 and set up by the federal constitution. quote:
A nonlawyer may not sign and file a notice of appeal on behalf of a corporation. To do so constitutes practicing law without a license in violation of s. 757.30 and voids the appeal. Requiring a lawyer to file the notice does not violate constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process. Jadair Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 209 Wis. 2d 187, 561 N.W.2d 718 (1997), 95-1946. Bar association corners the market! quote:
The state and federal constitutions provide identical procedural due process and equal protection safeguards. County of Kenosha v. C. & S. Management, Inc. 223 Wis. 2d 373, 588 N.W.2d 236 (1999), 97-0642. Really now? Do they? Unfortunate the actual process does not match the words on paper! quote:
A village board's denial of an application for a liquor license did not deprive the applicant of either liberty or property. Scott v. Village of Kewaskum, 786 F.2d 338 (1986). Oopsie forgot about his pursuit of happiness! quote:
An adult bookstore has no right to protect the privacy rights of its customers in a public, commercial establishment. City News & Novelty v. City of Waukesha, 170 Wis. 2d 14, 487 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App. 1992). papers please! Text from Legislative Reference Bureau Database of 2011-12 WISCONSIN STATUTES & ANNOTATIONS Updated through January 1, 2013. Includes all Acts of the 2011-12 Legislature and all Supreme Court Orders affecting statutes enacted on or before January 1, 2013. CHAPTER 1 SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION OF THE STATE 1.01 State sovereignty and jurisdiction. The sovereignty and jurisdiction of this state extend to all places within the boundaries declared in article II of the constitution, subject only to such rights of jurisdiction as have been or shall be acquired by the United States over any places therein; and the governor, and all subordinate officers of the state, shall maintain and defend its sovereignty and jurisdiction. All I see is protection of that fucking rag that defines the corporate boundaries. land of the free? I do not see and obligation to protect the inhabitants within those boundaries. We have been taken over by criminal elements. Patrick Henry pointed out on several occasions that the states HIJACKED THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE, it would be no different than the king of england writing a charter stating "We the People". Nice ring though! Sounds great! Like "Owner" and lots of other neeto cool catch phrases.
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment? Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality! "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|