Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 7:45:07 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Appointment authority within a private association does not make the federal reserve part of government nor are threy required to take an oath.

That was my point. TYVM

quote:

Corruption forms dis-establishmentarian groups.

Name a government anywhere at any time in history that has not had collusion between it and its merchants.

quote:

When there is no remedy there is a danger. The civil war proved there is no remedy, once a crown property always a crown property, that is how trusts work.

There was no remedy available to the 'slave power' and its insistence on expansion.


< Message edited by vincentML -- 3/12/2013 7:54:27 AM >

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 8:37:49 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

So, the President has the power to remove a member of the Federal Reserve for cause.

Removal for cause usually means a person has committed an illegal or unethical act. This does not alter my view that government actors have no power to effect the Fed's policies and are therefore not culpable for what it does.

quote:

Corruption exists, so I always find it somewhat incredulous whenever someone suggests that the government is incapable of doing any wrong whatsoever.

I have not seen anyone make such a suggestion.

quote:

That was in the past, not now. We can't sit back and rest on our laurels, which is exactly what I mean when I say that our government has failed to lead. They're supposed to be looking forward, not backward.

Are you suggesting socialist planning? Horrors! How far forward can a government look? In a democratic free market economy you get a democratic free market government. There are many who rage at government sponsored safety nets. I cannot imagine they would tolerate planning. So, what is it precisely that the govt should do to look forward?

quote:

What exactly do you mean when you say that they're prevented "from dealing with the complexities of a diverse society"? That's a very generalized and vague statement without any specifics.

They "drop out" become exclusionary, suspicious, insular, and self absorbed.

quote:

The regionalism you speak of is nowhere near as strong as it used to be. That's as much a result of mobility as anything else, since people move around a lot more than they did in the past. State and regional loyalties are more diffused and watered down these days, so it doesn't have as much of an impact on our politics as it once did.

You can still categorize the states in groups that for example have a majority of Evangelicals and vote Republican while those with a majority of Catholics vote Democratic. We still have rural vs urban mentalities. We still have states righters vs unionist (one nation) views. There are other issues that can be assigned to red and blue states.

quote:

Americans might be happy with what they have now - so happy in fact that some feel compelled to jealously guard what they have and protect it from anyone or anything that might try to take it away.

That's a good point.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 8:51:35 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
So how can taking up arms against a foreign government be treason?
If a government operates outside the purview of its charter then it is foreign.
It means a coup took place and you were not aware.

If a coup did not take place a grand jury they would be required to indict you for a fucking traffic ticket and ALL civil cases regardless would require a jury.

The office of citizen would provide free legal services the same way any other office is treated in government.

You would be able to declare your rights and the courts would be required to accept your declaration unless the opposing party could PROVE you injured them.

As it stands all law is in favor of the organization called government. They are the people with the guns that force us out of our paid in full homes when we do not pay them rent regardless if we use their services or not.

The are the same people that redistribute everyones wealth but the top 1%.

The constitution itself points out that being in government is a position of profit.




in fact you do not even have the 1st amendment right to EXERCISE your religion.

All you have is the right to pray. LOL

We have been taken over by a coup by stealth by some foreign agency, (most likely the banking cabal).

Proof of this is that we no longer have our law and it has been taken over by corporate legislatures and courts.

quote:

DUE PROCESS

Although a person may invoke the right against self incrimination in a civil case in order to protect himself in a subsequent criminal action, an inference against the person's interest may be drawn as a matter of law based upon an implied admission that a truthful answer would tend to prove that the witness had committed the criminal act or what might constitute a criminal act. Molloy v. Molloy, 46 Wis. 2d 682, 176 N.W.2d 292.


blam 5th is dead!

quote:

Substantive due process requires that the state not deprive its citizens of life, liberty, or property without due process. Absent a special relationship, it does not impose an affirmative obligation upon the state to ensure the protection of those rights from a private actor, even when governmental aid may be necessary to secure a person's life, liberty, or property. Jones v. Dane County, 195 Wis. 2d 892, 537 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App. 1995), 92-0946.

A procedural due process claim arises when there is a deprivation of a right without sufficient process. Generally a predeprivation hearing is required, but when a deprivation results from a random act of a state employee, the question becomes the adequacy of postdeprivation remedies. Jones v. Dane County, 195 Wis. 2d 892, 537 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App. 1995), 92-0946.



back to the 5th 6th 7th 10th etc. all cases fail the standards AGREED UPON BY THE ORIGINAL 13 and set up by the federal constitution.


quote:

A nonlawyer may not sign and file a notice of appeal on behalf of a corporation. To do so constitutes practicing law without a license in violation of s. 757.30 and voids the appeal. Requiring a lawyer to file the notice does not violate constitutional guarantees of equal protection and due process. Jadair Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 209 Wis. 2d 187, 561 N.W.2d 718 (1997), 95-1946.


Bar association corners the market!

quote:

The state and federal constitutions provide identical procedural due process and equal protection safeguards. County of Kenosha v. C. & S. Management, Inc. 223 Wis. 2d 373, 588 N.W.2d 236 (1999), 97-0642.


Really now? Do they? Unfortunate the actual process does not match the words on paper!

quote:

A village board's denial of an application for a liquor license did not deprive the applicant of either liberty or property. Scott v. Village of Kewaskum, 786 F.2d 338 (1986).


Oopsie forgot about his pursuit of happiness!


quote:

An adult bookstore has no right to protect the privacy rights of its customers in a public, commercial establishment. City News & Novelty v. City of Waukesha, 170 Wis. 2d 14, 487 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App. 1992).


papers please!



Text from Legislative Reference Bureau Database of
2011-12 WISCONSIN STATUTES & ANNOTATIONS
Updated through January 1, 2013.
Includes all Acts of the 2011-12 Legislature and all Supreme Court Orders affecting statutes enacted on or before January 1, 2013.
CHAPTER 1
SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION OF THE STATE


1.01  State sovereignty and jurisdiction. The sovereignty and jurisdiction of this state extend to all places within the boundaries declared in article II of the constitution, subject only to such rights of jurisdiction as have been or shall be acquired by the United States over any places therein; and the governor, and all subordinate officers of the state, shall maintain and defend its sovereignty and jurisdiction.



All I see is protection of that fucking rag that defines the corporate boundaries.

land of the free?

I do not see and obligation to protect the inhabitants within those boundaries.

We have been taken over by criminal elements. Patrick Henry pointed out on several occasions that the states HIJACKED THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE, it would be no different than the king of england writing a charter stating "We the People".

Nice ring though! Sounds great! Like "Owner" and lots of other neeto cool catch phrases.




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 8:53:38 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Removal for cause usually means a person has committed an illegal or unethical act. This does not alter my view that government actors have no power to effect the Fed's policies and are therefore not culpable for what it does.




They created the fuckers, and authorize their operations withing this coountry!

Therefore are subject to if not implied a constructive trust.

The creation and or allowance for operation is both a fiduciary and trust breach as is the continuance by simply turning their heads and or unlawfully creating precedent (law) from the bench.

Kelo?

They never had any authority to reconstruct the government. EVER

Not from you or I or anyone UNDER it.







< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/12/2013 9:01:14 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 9:13:03 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:


Therefore are subject to if not implied a constructive trust.


Although this makes absolutely no sense, if it did make sense, it wouldn't make any sense.

And evrything after is dee doo dee doo out of the realm of reality.  And this is not happening this year is it?

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 3/12/2013 9:18:07 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 9:19:52 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
only for those who fail to comprehend the words on their screen


did they forget to send you the memo?



< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/12/2013 9:27:50 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 10:00:35 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, I don't think I have enough tinfoil or a big enough pile of shithouse law to spouit to make the memo radar.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 1:38:31 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

So how can taking up arms against a foreign government be treason?
If a government operates outside the purview of its charter then it is foreign.
It means a coup took place and you were not aware.

They gave a coup and no one came so it was cancelled for lack of interest.
They may try again next year.
Stay tuned for occasional updates.
Meanwhile, the good citizens continue their daily lives: working, saving, investing, eating, drinking, fornicating, having kids, playing, getting sick, dying, etc, etc . . . . all God's chillun don' wanna hear no mo sheiittt cuz your crock runnith over.
Wondering how you make room in your life for all that toxic nonsense.
Must be hard to be you.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 2:15:39 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

So how can taking up arms against a foreign government be treason?
If a government operates outside the purview of its charter then it is foreign.
It means a coup took place and you were not aware.

They gave a coup and no one came so it was cancelled for lack of interest.
They may try again next year.
Stay tuned for occasional updates.
Meanwhile, the good citizens continue their daily lives: working, saving, investing, eating, drinking, fornicating, having kids, playing, getting sick, dying, etc, etc . . . . all God's chillun don' wanna hear no mo sheiittt cuz your crock runnith over.
Wondering how you make room in your life for all that toxic nonsense.
Must be hard to be you.



yessa massa sir may I have another!



cant hardly be toxic ifnz taint twu!

Thats ok you will recover, next time I will try to feed you all that massive governmentn and legal corruption in smaller doses.

Court takes notice; no on point rebuttal,

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 2:18:49 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
perhaps if you look up the definition of foreign and stop spouting such factually unencumbered drivel and asswipe on such far flung subjects that you possess no scintilla of evidence or knowledge of, but there isn't a great deal of hope held out for such action.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 4:16:21 PM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

So, the President has the power to remove a member of the Federal Reserve for cause.


Removal for cause usually means a person has committed an illegal or unethical act. This does not alter my view that government actors have no power to effect the Fed's policies and are therefore not culpable for what it does.


Perhaps, although the statute doesn't elaborate on that. Perhaps it's left up to the President's discretion to decide what is justifiable cause?

Besides, the President is still responsible for the people he appoints, and the Senate is responsible for confirming those appointments. If they pick a clinker, then it's still their fault, even if they they can't remove him. It's ultimately the responsibility of whoever hired them. I would say the same about the Supreme Court, the CIA Director, or any other non-elected post appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

What do you think about having the Federal Reserve Board of Governors as elected posts, rather than being appointed?

quote:


quote:

Corruption exists, so I always find it somewhat incredulous whenever someone suggests that the government is incapable of doing any wrong whatsoever.

I have not seen anyone make such a suggestion.


Not in so many words, but I always question the tactics of ridicule whenever they're used against someone questioning government policy.

quote:


quote:

That was in the past, not now. We can't sit back and rest on our laurels, which is exactly what I mean when I say that our government has failed to lead. They're supposed to be looking forward, not backward.

Are you suggesting socialist planning? Horrors! How far forward can a government look? In a democratic free market economy you get a democratic free market government. There are many who rage at government sponsored safety nets. I cannot imagine they would tolerate planning. So, what is it precisely that the govt should do to look forward?


I wasn't necessarily thinking in terms of economics (although a bit of planning ahead might have helped). Just using basic common sense (i.e. "don't spend more money than you take in") might have helped a great deal. The people who rage at government sponsored safety nets usually are the same ones who rage against deficit spending and the national debt, although their rage doesn't seem to have even the slightest influence over governmental policy.

But you don't need to have a crystal ball to be able to predict what might happen if more money goes out than comes back in. Soon, there will be no more money. If they can't at least look that far forward (as any consumer or head of household must do), then they don't deserve to lead. Simple as that.

But aside from economics, let's take the examples you've brought up in this thread. The patriot groups you mentioned and their political etymology going back to fascism and the KKK. We also discussed the Civil Rights Movement and that the government finally decided to do something about that issue in the 1950s and 60s, nearly a century after the Civil War ended. Don't you think that could have happened much sooner if we had a government that looked forward back in, say, 1880 or so?

quote:


quote:

What exactly do you mean when you say that they're prevented "from dealing with the complexities of a diverse society"? That's a very generalized and vague statement without any specifics.


They "drop out" become exclusionary, suspicious, insular, and self absorbed.


I'm still not sure if I'm understanding the reasons you think they do this, though. I've known people who have a somewhat "rebellious" consciousness, but I also find that they're far more sincere and scrupulously honest than the average person on the street. They're rugged individualists, non-conformists, marching to the beat of a different drum. So, they may not fit in with the "In Crowd," but so what?

Maybe it's not that they can't deal with the complexities of a diverse society, but maybe they think society is fucked.

And whether you like it or not, this particular mindset is very much a part of our culture and a part of our diverse society. Slogans such as "free your mind" and "fight the power" are a part of our national consciousness. In our movies, literature, music - one can find rebellion all over the place.

quote:


quote:

The regionalism you speak of is nowhere near as strong as it used to be. That's as much a result of mobility as anything else, since people move around a lot more than they did in the past. State and regional loyalties are more diffused and watered down these days, so it doesn't have as much of an impact on our politics as it once did.


You can still categorize the states in groups that for example have a majority of Evangelicals and vote Republican while those with a majority of Catholics vote Democratic. We still have rural vs urban mentalities. We still have states righters vs unionist (one nation) views. There are other issues that can be assigned to red and blue states.


I always thought that "red state"/"blue state" stuff was a lot of hype.


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 4:55:01 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

perhaps if you look up the definition of foreign and stop spouting such factually unencumbered drivel and asswipe on such far flung subjects that you possess no scintilla of evidence or knowledge of, but there isn't a great deal of hope held out for such action.

perhaps if you comprehend how it applies you wouldnt break your fingernails coming up with nothing and be capable of rebuttal rather than constantly attacking me and shitting all over yourself in the process.




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 7:30:45 PM   
nighthawk3569


Posts: 283
Joined: 6/22/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


'Patriot' militia groups who take up arms against the United States are no longer Americans. They are treasonous. They fail to heed the lessons learned by the late Confederacy. So, fuck em! They will deserve the wrath of our Defense forces.


Why do you think they're called Patriot groups? And if 'no longer' Americans, what then? Much more American than the lobby groups now in charge of politics.

'hawk



_____________________________

"If the government is big enough to give you everything you want...then it's big enough to take away everything you have!"

Thomas Jefferson




(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 8:37:35 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

What do you think about having the Federal Reserve Board of Governors as elected posts, rather than being appointed?

The whole point of an independent Federal Reserve is to keep it out of the reach of political parties. Rather like the Supreme Court.

quote:

But you don't need to have a crystal ball to be able to predict what might happen if more money goes out than comes back in. Soon, there will be no more money. If they can't at least look that far forward (as any consumer or head of household must do), then they don't deserve to lead. Simple as that.

A family always has the option to increase its income. A government that creates its own money does the same. The issue is one of Market confidence. Not an issue of running out of money. There has been no lack of DEMAND for US Govt bonds. Market confidence has not suffered so far.

quote:

We also discussed the Civil Rights Movement and that the government finally decided to do something about that issue in the 1950s and 60s, nearly a century after the Civil War ended. Don't you think that could have happened much sooner if we had a government that looked forward back in, say, 1880 or so?

Zonie, you speak as if "the government" were a monolith. It isn't. There is no such thing as "THE Government." The governing process in a democracy emerges from the clash of competing interests and forces.

quote:

I'm still not sure if I'm understanding the reasons you think they do this, though. I've known people who have a somewhat "rebellious" consciousness, but I also find that they're far more sincere and scrupulously honest than the average person on the street. They're rugged individualists, non-conformists, marching to the beat of a different drum. So, they may not fit in with the "In Crowd," but so what?

We were talking about armed militias who train for insurrection. A step beyond rugged individualism.

quote:

I always thought that "red state"/"blue state" stuff was a lot of hype.

You might wish to take a closer look. Don;t you think there is a deep ideological rift in our nation?

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 8:40:54 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Why do you think they're called Patriot groups? And if 'no longer' Americans, what then? Much more American than the lobby groups now in charge of politics.

They are self labeled. Mis-labeled.

When McVeigh attacked the Marrah Building he ceased being an American.

(in reply to nighthawk3569)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 8:42:45 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

I didn't realize a president had to be black to have a reason for a good anti-government conspiracy.

Take a look at who the big anti government types are, where these militias are, where the strong "I'm gonna stock up on guns and when the time comes, gonna fight the government and the black helicopters" emotions lie, and you have your answer. These people hate the government, but many of them also reside in the old KKK belt, down south and in the farm belt in the midwest (yes, folks, those good, hearty midwestern farmers also tended to belong to the KKK quite often, it wasn't just down in Dixie; the KKK had strong presence in the farming areas in NJ, too). So they have double reason to hate the government, they hate it because they believe they are victims of it, pay for everyone else and get nothing, etc, and they also hate the fact that there is a non white male in the white house. If Hillary CLinton was in there, they wouldn't hate her all that much less either, for being a woman.

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 8:49:36 PM   
njlauren


Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011
Status: offline
What I find funny is that the anti government types, the tin foi hat people, the patriot militia types and the like, is how they contradict themselves. On the one hand, they rant and rail at how wasteful the government is, how it spends a grand on a hammer or 500 bucks on a toilet seat, they point to failed policies, stupid things the government admittedly can do, and call it a joke..but on the other hand, they are promoting the idea that this same government, full of stupid bureaucratcs, clueless legislators,you name it, is the progenitor of this big conspiracy, with the new world order, Global Jewry (ah, the good ones never go away), the federal reserve and the guys in black suits with the black helicopters, that is going to take away our rights and turn the US into another USSR or something, talk about people eating locoweed cereal...

It kind of reminds me of a joke a friend of mine told me, a minister, he said people talk about organized religion, he said they never attended any kind of religious organizational meeting, if they think religion is organized *lol*

(in reply to njlauren)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 10:22:28 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Why do you think they're called Patriot groups? And if 'no longer' Americans, what then? Much more American than the lobby groups now in charge of politics.

They are self labeled. Mis-labeled.

When McVeigh attacked the Marrah Building he ceased being an American.



really?

citation please


(Oh and incidentally lauren, you will never see it coming. and if you want black helicopters go to crandon wisconsin, its an imaginary town in an imaginary state LOL)

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/12/2013 10:24:26 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 10:27:26 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

What do you think about having the Federal Reserve Board of Governors as elected posts, rather than being appointed?

The whole point of an independent Federal Reserve is to keep it out of the reach of political parties. Rather like the Supreme Court.

quote:

But you don't need to have a crystal ball to be able to predict what might happen if more money goes out than comes back in. Soon, there will be no more money. If they can't at least look that far forward (as any consumer or head of household must do), then they don't deserve to lead. Simple as that.

A family always has the option to increase its income. A government that creates its own money does the same. The issue is one of Market confidence. Not an issue of running out of money. There has been no lack of DEMAND for US Govt bonds. Market confidence has not suffered so far.

quote:

We also discussed the Civil Rights Movement and that the government finally decided to do something about that issue in the 1950s and 60s, nearly a century after the Civil War ended. Don't you think that could have happened much sooner if we had a government that looked forward back in, say, 1880 or so?

Zonie, you speak as if "the government" were a monolith. It isn't. There is no such thing as "THE Government." The governing process in a democracy emerges from the clash of competing interests and forces.

quote:

I'm still not sure if I'm understanding the reasons you think they do this, though. I've known people who have a somewhat "rebellious" consciousness, but I also find that they're far more sincere and scrupulously honest than the average person on the street. They're rugged individualists, non-conformists, marching to the beat of a different drum. So, they may not fit in with the "In Crowd," but so what?

We were talking about armed militias who train for insurrection. A step beyond rugged individualism.

quote:

I always thought that "red state"/"blue state" stuff was a lot of hype.

You might wish to take a closer look. Don;t you think there is a deep ideological rift in our nation?



and do you even know how many of your points are unconstitutional? LOL



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism - 3/12/2013 11:21:40 PM   
nighthawk3569


Posts: 283
Joined: 6/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Why do you think they're called Patriot groups? And if 'no longer' Americans, what then? Much more American than the lobby groups now in charge of politics.

They are self labeled. Mis-labeled.

When McVeigh attacked the Marrah Building he ceased being an American.


Then McVeigh was tried, convicted and executed by a country he wasn't a citizen of. By extension, Nichols was tried, convicted and imprisioned by a country he wasn't, and isn't, a citizen of.

I'm reasonably sure the term 'Patriot group' didn't originate within the groups...but was first used, in a disparaging manner, by the press, in attempts to belittle them. Seems I remember reading the term 'so-called Patriot 'group, many years ago. That's not to say the people in these groups didn't regard themselves as patriots, they just didn't apply the term to themselves...until the media made the term popular.

'hawk

edited to correct typo...not content



< Message edited by nighthawk3569 -- 3/12/2013 11:28:17 PM >


_____________________________

"If the government is big enough to give you everything you want...then it's big enough to take away everything you have!"

Thomas Jefferson




(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: The Year in Hate and Extremism Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125