RE: The Real and the Fake

RE: The Real and the Fake (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

lizi -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 5:24:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Oddly enough, from what I've seen on the site from multiple years of reading threads, I find a number of women who related that a lot of males (no matter which side of the kneel) are considered in the 'fake' category because they are wannabes, fantasists, and using the BDSM angle to get laid. OP, you're not going to attract the cream of the crop here. I had a look at the profile to confirm My suspensions. Married dude, no offer of confirmation from your wife that you're not cheating, and no BDSM or D/s experience. How "real" do you think we're going to believe you are as opposed to 'guy who thought saying he was kinky would get him some strange on the side'? Ain't this the truth. All the men who put on the mantle of Dom so that they can troll here for what they think are easy lays. Do I have to call the traveling businessmen who want a woman in every city real now too? It just cracks me up that he thinks the Dominant men are the real ones. There are so many that flip flop and say what they think the women want to hear or scowl into the camera with the toy collection on the bed- playing a part that will get them sex. What's so real about all that?

Rule -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 5:48:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: curioushusband I am curious as to what you all think about the legitimacy factor of the people on here. I am not interested in their legitimacy.

DarkSteven -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 5:52:38 AM)
I don't worry about it. I only chat with people I consider myself compatible with. That rules out the obvious scammer profiles that talk about nothing a real woman would ever discuss. I chat with people. If they're real and compatible, they enjoy the chat. If they're scammers, they get impatient because I'll be trying to get to know them while they're waiting for me to fork over a check when they mention sucking my cock. If they're incompatible, they'll not enjoy the conversation. I realize that talking with people is a radical notion...

ShaharThorne -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 5:58:20 AM)
I think LP says it best for me. Besides, who wants to deal with me? I am a fat chick with missing teeth...not fake at all.

littlewonder -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 7:06:02 AM)
I'm a fake. Or maybe just a figment of your imagination.

LafayetteLady -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 7:25:58 AM)
Kind of like the number of married men with wives who simply don't meet their needs.

descrite -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 7:40:07 AM)
OP, I know exactly what you're talking about-- I have met several women through this site, and tried to arrange meetups with them, but the vast majority have so far turned out to be replicants. And not even the current IV Series, but the old IIIs. I'll be chatting her up, really getting to know her, and then I ask her to pass a simple Voight-Kampff battery, and she's all like, "Um, well...I have a lot of laundry to do..." You have no idea how many DNA swabs I've had to reject in recent months. What is it with all the skinjobs being attracted to this site? I don't know, dude. I just don't know.

JeffBC -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 8:32:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: littlewonder I'm a fake. Well duh! That was obvious right from the start. No mouse types as well as you do. And as if that weren't enough, I took the excellent advice offered by that other guy and reverse image searched your avatar. Sure enough it cropped up all over the internet! And that whole little coy act in your profile is obviously designed to lure men in. I can't believe anyone falls for this shit.

Missokyst -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 8:49:32 AM)
Wrong on both counts. I see more guys slap on a dominant/master tag and wear it like a superman costume. Let me tell you a costume does not a man of kryton make. I am not sure about sub women as I don't ever look. But many of my real life acqaintences are here and they do this IRL. I cannot believe that so many real in my area alone are an anomaly. Also got to say that you are married. You are going to get a lot of people rejecting you on that basis alone. And if you are looking for those whose pics look like models or who state they are 18--22 bi sub slaves who want to serve you... you get what you deserve. quote: ORIGINAL: curioushusband My guess is that the dom men are more often than not real (even if they don't always follow through) and most of the sub women are either just straight up fake

OsideGirl -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 9:53:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: curioushusband My guess is that the dom men are more often than not real (even if they don't always follow through) and most of the sub women are either just straight up fake or posted by husbands/scorned boyfriends/etc but are not legit. Your guess is wrong.

Zonie63 -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 3:43:29 PM)
[image]http://www.freethunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/linus-great-pumpkin.jpg[/image]

playfulotter -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/16/2013 4:17:20 PM)
Zonie, That was a great cartoon to put on this thread!

theRose4U -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/17/2013 8:49:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: myotherself Be wary of throwing around terms like that because some might see a married guy looking for a bit of kinky fun on the side as being 'fake'....[8\|] But isn't fake always about what's unappealing & less than desirable to eeewe WTF in the eyes of the user? Jus sayin!!

TieMeInKnottss -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/17/2013 12:50:18 PM)
As we often mention (because someone starts this topic about once a week..) the term "fake" means "not authentic or genuine" and you cannot use that to describe something that has no "standard" of genuine. Gold is fake if it is not entirely comprised of the metal we call "gold", "art" is fake if it is not created by the person who presents it as his/her work, a "fake" can be a "fake"...if I sell you a cubic zirconia claiming it is a real diamond..it is a fake diamond...if I sell you a diamond and advertise it as a cubic zirconia...you have purchased a fake cubic zirconia & I have perpetrated a fraud.. There IS NO STANDARD for REAL in subs or doms. Just because I don't let a sadist whip me does not make me a "fake" sub.... Now, if you are complaining that the profiles have been contrived, made up to perpetrate fraud or to mislead...yes many are which is why you ask questions, get to know someone as a person rather than a potential sex partner (yes...the woman who claims to be a size 2 25 year old blonde who really is an out of shape middle aged housewife...is a FAKE 25 yr old but she is NOT A FAKE WOMEN), you don't send money or trust someone you have never seen & mail them your life savings!!! In Audit we have a saying... "trust but verify"

sweets1966 -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/17/2013 3:10:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Pyramus 6. Since this step really leaves you with only one or two out of hundreds who initially show up, and who responded positively to your enlightened queries, and who might be interested in you ... your next logical step might be to double the search radius from 5 miles to 10 miles. Bear in mind that doubling the radius quadruples the hit count (which is a huge burden on your weeding out method). I put in 5 miles.. the return was two profiles, last on 2005 and 2007. not much work there at all smiles As in many things, the effort you put in is directly proportional to the quality of the results.

curioushusband -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/24/2013 7:29:36 PM)
It is a passing the time kind of question. Given the amount of complaints on many profiles about it... it seems a fairly relevant issue. Color me curious.

curioushusband -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/24/2013 7:31:55 PM)
By "legitimacy" I simply mean people who are on here posting a profile and interested in actually following through... there is nothing subjective about that.

curioushusband -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/24/2013 7:54:57 PM)
Sexyred1, It is much less likely that people who pay for a profile on a website are going to be fake. Why? Because they are paying for it... If I can throw up a profile on a website on a whim, for fun, because I am bored... why not? If I have to pay to do so, I probably won't.

xssve -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/24/2013 8:20:17 PM)
Sounds like you are really a husband looking for a way out of choices already made.

curioushusband -> RE: The Real and the Fake (3/24/2013 8:23:40 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MissToYouRedux quote: ORIGINAL: curioushusband "... My guess is that the dom men are more often than not real (even if they don't always follow through)..." If the person isn't going to follow through anyway, what's the benefit of being "real"? Honestly, the benefit is that they get a few responses and they can get off as a result. that is the benefit. they aren't looking to meet you, but they are what they say they are: Men interested in being dominant who for whatever reason won't or can't or are unwilling to follow through in real time. Pathetic maybe, but they are what they are. Contra... a great majority of sub women on here are, it is my guess, fake. Why do I say this? let me put it this way... I caught a coworker's (female) husband posting her picture on here declaring that she wanted certain things (and without going into details here, there is good reason to think that the assumption is accurate.. trust me for the sake of argument, that she is not into it). I I know, one instance does not make a trend but my sense is that women in general are less likely to post on a site like this and when they do it is safer thinking that it is their husband or boyfriend... or scorned lover who is actually doing it.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

5.078125E-02