|
disretion7 -> RE: Submission to Dominatrices. (3/21/2013 2:30:10 PM)
|
quote:
I'm not trying to push a phone sex Domme nor trying to talk anybody into anything. I only shared my own experience because I'd heard from some who had no encounters of any kind worthwhile, affordable, or otherwise. I HAVE been to local munches and ALL I found were members pushing pro-Dommes.
I replied, yesterday, about the above paragraph which you, correctly, took issue with because of its contradictory message. I'm sorry that, for whatever reason, after I'd posted my reply and thought it was there permanently, it disappeared. So I'll try to re-do my reply.
Anyway, I'd apologized for that confusing message and noted that I'd never minded pushing pro-Dommes, but did not, generally, do so because I did not think the Dommes would want me to without their permission. I, also, noted that I made an exception on my profile because I thought THAT particular Domme wanted me to.
Then, I addressed the contradiction in of my phrase: "ALL I found were members pushing pro-Dommes". I'd mistyped that phrase and, being in a hurry, forgot to proofread it. What I really meant to say, in lieu of that phrase was, "I found members there pushing pro-Dommes.
BTW, since you've been walking me down memory lane, I had another recollection. There was ONE lifestyle-only Domme, I'd met at a munch, who considered playing with me, and confided (whether true, or not) that she has once been a pro-Domme. Nothing ever came of it and it has been enough years ago that Casey's Restaurant, on N. Monroe, Spokane, where I attended most of the munches, is closed down now.
|
|
|
|
