AthenaSurrenders -> RE: How much merit do you put in a picture? (3/21/2013 11:12:43 AM)
|
I'm not looking but from past experiences: My now-husband's photos were kinda crappy - he's just not photogenic, always feels a bit awkward posing or flashing a smile for the camera. He wasn't unattractive, but in the photos he was just Mr Average, blend into the background. In person, when I can see his reactions and expressions, when he's relaxed and when his smile is genuine - that did it for me. So I wouldn't dismiss someone based on their photo. I do think physical attraction has a role to play, I just don't think a photo gives you much more than an idea of what the person looks like. Then again, I do consider photos a valuable tool because they often give a lot of clues about the person. Where it was taken, their pose, their expression, their clothes - they all tell you something about the type of person they are and what they prioritize. For example, no matter how gorgeous a guy might be, if his photos show a filthy living environment, are all vain mirror shots/cock shots, all seem to have a beer in his hand - he's not likely to be a match for me. On the other hand, if he's playing a musical instrument or a sport, or has a range of photos all taken in different places, it will spark an interest. A lot of it comes down to effort too - if you can't be bothered to change out of your stained sweatsuit for your dating profile photo I'm not convinced you will make a big effort in other areas.
|
|
|
|