LillyBoPeep
Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JessicaBrooke Hello there! Thanks for taking the time to read and hopefully share some advice. Tonight, while I was chatting with a Dom I respect very much, I was told that I am not a submissive but I am a slave. I'm always curious, what's the relationship here? Is this person a good friend? Or someone angling to be more than friends? Motivation often plays a factor when people make statements like this towards someone else. (I should add, there are some good friends - a couple of them from CM - who have made statements like this to me, and I trust their opinions because I know they weren't angling for something when they said it. =p) quote:
ORIGINAL: JessicaBrooke That comment is really putting my panties in a twist. From where I stand- being a slave (voluntarily, mind you) is the ultimate submission, is it not? Not necessarily - but in a way. But not necessarily. =p To me, being a slave is about a concept of ownership. That's pretty much as far as I go with it. Ownership looks differently to everyone, and of course, we voluntarily go into situations of ownership, unlike cars, trucks, or real slaves who are bought and sold illegally. =p One person owns a house that is falling apart in two years, and someone else owns a 300 year old home that looks like the day it was built. Some people don't mow their lawns but once a month, and others meticulously feed, water, and landscape. Some people have dogs who are incredibly well trained, understand all sorts of commands, and run agility courses. and others have dogs who tear up slippers and books and earn medals when they just don't pee on ALL the furniture in one day. =p People own differently. Someone without an ownership dynamic may be far more submissive in nature than someone who is in one. Not all slaves are into being submissive, they just feel bound by the ownership concept. So someone may be owned by a person with a very lenient sense of ownership, who really doesn't care what she does, as long as, at the end of the day, she does whatever one or two things he does expressly ask for. Meanwhile, someone else may be in a Dom/sub relationship that is super strict with very few boundaries, but they don't include an ownership concept in the relationship at all. There's a difference between owner/property and leader/follower - they can totally intersect and exist in the same place at the same time, or they can be different things. quote:
ORIGINAL: JessicaBrooke I have been collared before, and during that time I never once felt I was a slave... I loved to please my Sir, and everything I did for him was out of love and respect. I never once felt 'enslaved' because it was my choice to serve him. Yes, I called him Master, and yes he called me pet, or slave when I was naughty, but I never felt that I was chained to him. I stayed at his side by choice and wore his collar with pride. The last time I was collared, it was like this too, but also within this larger sort of feeling that he DID own me. But I was happy to feel that way. So there was pride in the feeling of being owned by someone I loved and respected. If that makes sense. It seems like the connotation of being "chained" to someone should be negative, but I don't feel it that way at all. When I was owned by that person, I was chained to him, to what he needed or wanted, and compelled to act in accordance, even when I sometimes didn't want to, and that made me genuinely happy. We didn't use M/s terms, though, because he didn't like them. So we were D/s in name, but because of the ownership idea, we were M/s in action, at least by the way I define things. =p quote:
ORIGINAL: JessicaBrooke In my mind- there are two types of 'slaves'. The first sort of slave is simply property, a toy to be used and then dismissed. The second type of 'slave' is when a submissive is exclusively serving one Master. She (or he) follows His (or Her) every command without question... I know a lot of these relationships are 24/7, but isn't that still being submissive in nature? To me, there are two types - real slaves who are illegally traded around the world, and consensual slaves in M/s relationships, who have consented to an ownership dynamic with someone of their choosing. The rest of it is in the details between the two people involved. quote:
ORIGINAL: JessicaBrooke I guess my question is, what do you define as the difference between a slave and a submissive? Where do you draw the line and is there really a difference other than title? The difference for me is ownership.
< Message edited by LillyBoPeep -- 3/25/2013 5:59:06 AM >
_____________________________
Midwestern Girl "Obey your Master." Metallica
|