What causes urban poverty (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

What causes urban poverty


Ethnic or social majorities/1%ers/corporations
  11% (4)
Personal failures on the part of those so afflicted
  27% (10)
Karma
  0% (0)
An artful combination of the above
  38% (14)
Other - please expand
  22% (8)


Total Votes : 36
(last vote on : 3/27/2013 7:26:14 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )


Message


TheHeretic -> What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 1:47:07 PM)

Here we go. It seems to be interrupting elsewhere, so let's give it a place of it's own.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 1:51:13 PM)

Not enough options.

And why single out "white people"??? What about all the other races?
I find that insulting!




TheHeretic -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 1:54:00 PM)

Fixed it for you.

Please feel free to use other, and expand on your choice.




njlauren -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 2:03:44 PM)

Lot of reasons, and it is complicated:

1)Communities that have been stripped of a variety of economic levels. For example, city policy with public housing put such restrictive income levels, in them that the ended up with the hard core, multi generation welfare type of people, kids were brought up around multiple generations who had never worked. When poor kids are around middle class people, working class people, they have role models, when they are around a lot of people not working, they are influenced by that.

2)Schools starved for funds, because school funding is based on property taxes.

3)Both culture, and laws on things like aid, that meant it common for kids to be born out of wedlock, kids born to poor moms are not likely to do well, in school or anywhere else. There is some truth that part of the problem is within IMO, that this has become the norm for many people. Likewise. from personal experience, there is a lot of negative ideas about doing well in school achieving, where somehow going to school and getting good grades makes one an oreo cookie or a suck up to white people. Aid programs cut of benefits if the father is present in the kids lives, rather then work to encourage families.

4)Policies that shift jobs to suburban areas or to more wealthy areas of cities, that takes jobs out of the communities, hasn't helped. There are a lot of people who instead of looking at cities as a place where you can bring people together, where you can have a large job pool, see them as these cesspools and instead move jobs all over the place, then wonder why they have a hard time getting labor.

5)Low expectations, the idea that somehow inner city kids can't achieve, so they create social promotion, they make school into some sort of soft jail, rather than expecting the kids to learn.

6)With schools, assuming that it is as easy to achieve results in an inner city school as it will in a well off suburb, not recognizing the differences. Among other things, inner city schools tend to draw the most inexperienced teachers, rather than experienced ones, where more well off schools attract the better ones. It also creates a culture where teachers are kept in bad schools who don't perform, because they think they can't get replacements.

If you really want to know? Do some research on Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the man wrote more books on the subject then most policy makers read....he had it nailed over 50 years ago, problem is, the conservatives read what he wrote and blamed the ills on the people, and the liberals were offended he aired the dirty laundry.




TheHeretic -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 2:27:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

Lot of reasons, and it is complicated:

1)Communities that have been stripped of a variety of economic levels. For example, city policy with public housing put such restrictive income levels, in them that the ended up with the hard core, multi generation welfare type of people, kids were brought up around multiple generations who had never worked. When poor kids are around middle class people, working class people, they have role models, when they are around a lot of people not working, they are influenced by that.




This is the whole theory behind Section 8 housing subsidies. It doesn't work. The neighborhoods start sinking, then spiraling, down to the new lowest common denominator.

quote:

2)Schools starved for funds, because school funding is based on property taxes.


Your knowledge of school funding is heavily outdated, and grossly oversimplified in the age of federal subsidies and mandates.

Good points beyond. Thanks for staying inside the TLDR threshold.




Level -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 2:40:26 PM)

Lauren's paragraphs are large, & full of wisdom.





DesideriScuri -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 4:00:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
Lot of reasons, and it is complicated:
1)Communities that have been stripped of a variety of economic levels. For example, city policy with public housing put such restrictive income levels, in them that the ended up with the hard core, multi generation welfare type of people, kids were brought up around multiple generations who had never worked. When poor kids are around middle class people, working class people, they have role models, when they are around a lot of people not working, they are influenced by that.
2)Schools starved for funds, because school funding is based on property taxes.


What, then, is the fix? Who's to blame when property values in one school district drop when values in other districts stay the same or rise? Do failing schools share some the drop in property values?

quote:

4)Policies that shift jobs to suburban areas or to more wealthy areas of cities, that takes jobs out of the communities, hasn't helped. There are a lot of people who instead of looking at cities as a place where you can bring people together, where you can have a large job pool, see them as these cesspools and instead move jobs all over the place, then wonder why they have a hard time getting labor.


Part of the relocating business thing is that they do this to get into better areas (less crime, less risk of crime, etc.) or to move out to the suburbs where more of their employees live. And, there are times when higher paying jobs end up allowing people to move out of urban areas, which tends to lower the property values of the urban areas. And, then, to pay for all the services the poorer among us need, the urban areas have to increase taxes to pay for that stuff. And, as more and more people leave, the burden falls on fewer and fewer, leaving property owners/businesses to shoulder more and more. So, you end up chasing business into more friendly tax areas. And, that only exacerbates the problem.

So, the big question is, what can be done about it?

quote:

5)Low expectations, the idea that somehow inner city kids can't achieve, so they create social promotion, they make school into some sort of soft jail, rather than expecting the kids to learn.
6)With schools, assuming that it is as easy to achieve results in an inner city school as it will in a well off suburb, not recognizing the differences. Among other things, inner city schools tend to draw the most inexperienced teachers, rather than experienced ones, where more well off schools attract the better ones. It also creates a culture where teachers are kept in bad schools who don't perform, because they think they can't get replacements.


And then, if not enough "______" (enter socioeconomic classification of your choice) kids don't pass, the schools will be faulted and there will be racism and/or other forms of discrimination alleged. I agree that no group should have lower expectations than any other group. That's ridiculous from the get-go.

[sidebar] When there is proof that an action, policy, or test is discriminatory, then that action, policy or test needs to be fixed. This is easily seen with the SAT/ACT/IQ test (or whichever test it was) back in the 80/s/90's. [/sidebar]

quote:

If you really want to know? Do some research on Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the man wrote more books on the subject then most policy makers read....he had it nailed over 50 years ago, problem is, the conservatives read what he wrote and blamed the ills on the people, and the liberals were offended he aired the dirty laundry.







MrRodgers -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 4:07:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

Lot of reasons, and it is complicated:

1)Communities that have been stripped of a variety of economic levels. For example, city policy with public housing put such restrictive income levels, in them that the ended up with the hard core, multi generation welfare type of people, kids were brought up around multiple generations who had never worked. When poor kids are around middle class people, working class people, they have role models, when they are around a lot of people not working, they are influenced by that.




This is the whole theory behind Section 8 housing subsidies. It doesn't work. The neighborhoods start sinking, then spiraling, down to the new lowest common denominator.

quote:

2)Schools starved for funds, because school funding is based on property taxes.


Your knowledge of school funding is heavily outdated, and grossly oversimplified in the age of federal subsidies and mandates.

Good points beyond. Thanks for staying inside the TLDR threshold.

Federal mandates are most often unfunded and [its] educational subsidy has been shrinking in $$ per student.

Otherwise urban poverty is far too little money in the hands of far too many people. Kinkroids, why all of the rural poverty way back in the day when cotton was king ? Slaves had jobs too.

The poorest 1.5 million people in NYC have nothing except what's left over from a very small paycheck if they get one.




erieangel -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 4:38:33 PM)

Try this on for size. Today's minimum wage is worth less in actual spending power than the minimum wage was worth in 1960. The poor, minimum wage earner, along with those on the margins, like myself, who make just above minimum wage, are worst off than ever before. And we have higher local taxes than ever before.





TheHeretic -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 4:59:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

Try this on for size. Today's minimum wage is worth less in actual spending power than the minimum wage was worth in 1960. The poor, minimum wage earner, along with those on the margins, like myself, who make just above minimum wage, are worst off than ever before. And we have higher local taxes than ever before.





And a range of support entitlements and programs undreamed of, by the minimum wage earners of the 50 years ago.




tazzygirl -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 5:15:21 PM)

2 words.... living wage




dcnovice -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 5:45:44 PM)

FR

My immediate, slightly glib response was that poverty stems from lack of money.

Just came across what appears to be an interesting article but am, alas, too fried to digest it tonight.

http://www.huduser.org/periodicals/cityscpe/vol3num3/article3.pdf




erieangel -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 6:28:15 PM)

"Support entitlements and programs" (whatever those are) that we wouldn't need if wages had kept up with inflation all these years, don't ya think?

I earn about the same as the step father who raised me. On that he raised a family of 5, my mom was a stay-at-home wife, they paid a mortgage, we had weekend road trips and a vacation every year. I struggle to put gas in the car for work; have no mortgage but the property taxes kill me; and making the 45 minute drive to see my daughter is something that happens about once a month. Seriously, if wages had kept up with inflation, I wouldn't be earning $10.49 an hour; minimum wage would even be higher than that. I have over 150 hours of vacation time due me, I don't take any of it because what good is a vacation if I can't afford to go anyplace and enjoy myself? I certainly don't want to take a vacation and sit at home.

ETA: I did take 1 hour of vacation time last week when I left work early on Thursday because nobody was home and none of my community people were available to meet that late.




LookieNoNookie -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 7:05:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Here we go. It seems to be interrupting elsewhere, so let's give it a place of it's own.


I submit it's a lack of money.




njlauren -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 7:22:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren

Lot of reasons, and it is complicated:

1)Communities that have been stripped of a variety of economic levels. For example, city policy with public housing put such restrictive income levels, in them that the ended up with the hard core, multi generation welfare type of people, kids were brought up around multiple generations who had never worked. When poor kids are around middle class people, working class people, they have role models, when they are around a lot of people not working, they are influenced by that.




This is the whole theory behind Section 8 housing subsidies. It doesn't work. The neighborhoods start sinking, then spiraling, down to the new lowest common denominator.

quote:

2)Schools starved for funds, because school funding is based on property taxes.


Your knowledge of school funding is heavily outdated, and grossly oversimplified in the age of federal subsidies and mandates.

Good points beyond. Thanks for staying inside the TLDR threshold.

Nope, not at all. Federal spending on schools is only 9% of all school spending, and in many places, especially the big cities the northeast, it represents a very small percentage of the school budgets. In most towns, and cities and counties, school taxes make up about 85% of local property tax bills. Other states do accept a lot more federal aid, a lot of the 'low tax' states down south get significant portions of their school budgets from the feds (roughly 25% in states like South Carolina), in NJ it is about 2%. Take a look at the best school districts in this country, the Potomac, Marylands, Scarsdale, NY, Mendham, NJ, Basking Ridge, NJ and so forth, you will find they spend a lot of money on their kids, in places like Scarsdale it is 20k_ per kid, whereas in the worst districts (old, familiar territory, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama) they spend a fraction of that, and they are at the bottom of the pile..btw, the same problems with schools in inner cities exist in rural, poor areas like apalchia, mississippi, and so forth......

No states as far as I know use income taxes to fund school programs, and federal spending is targeted, but it represents relatively little money (and the GOP has been trying for years to get rid of federal education spending).


Section 8 is part of the problem, and so is public housing in general, plus there also is little incentive for those who economically move up to stay instead of moviing out to better neighborhoods.




vincentML -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 8:01:31 PM)

~FR~
Poverty in the inner cities is a fact of life and a child of history. No one is at fault. But no one cares or is able to do the heavy lifting to fix it. Or the ideology of competing politics hinders a solution. Take your choice.

When the civil rights crisis occurred in Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, etc . . when college students road the integrated buses into the southland after Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat there was great resistance by the established and frightened whites in the south. At the same time there was a surge of Negro migration northward.

The Negro migration north frightened whites in the northern cities. MLK's assassination spurred black riots in the north and added to the fear of whites. I witnessed the outward migration from the cities both in NJ where I taught in the late 60s and in Miami where I taught in the 70s. I recall the safe and prosperous downtown shopping district in Newark. I also recall the National Guard tanks rumbling along Springfield Avenue.

In the outlying areas, farmland was converted to new housing developments and sleepy country schools were built up, consolidated and quickly overcrowded. We cannot discount the effect of the surge of our national economy after WWII and the new demand for housing. Nor can we discount the facility afforded by the National Highway System built in the 1950s. The new highways gave easy access to the new suburbs. They also bypassed formally prosperous downtown areas. Miami’s prosperous black Overtown community of mom and pop businesses was cut in half by I-95 and isolated from the city’s commerce. The mandated integration of schools by busing undoubtedly impacted neighborhood change. I taught in an all black school in Miami and saw teachers who were so frightened they brought guns to work, and yet the kids were pretty wonderful. I also taught in tri-racially/ethnically mixed schools without incident. I can say I had an inside view.

That was the history. There was no blame. That's just the way it happened.

Now the result. The history of white emigration from the cities to the burbs left blacks in the inner city without transportation and without work because industry and white owned small businesses emigrated as well. Our black population was ghettoized by the historical events of the 50s and 60s in major cities like Philly, Detroit, Chicago, Newark, etc. Theirs is a desperate situation of poverty and the attendant crime that goes with drugs and unemployment. The lack of jobs is not their fault. And the emigration of whites seeking a safe residence and education for their kids cannot be faulted.

Jobs are needed. Not talk. Economic revitalization of our cities has to be a national priority.

That is why the proposal for an interracial dialogue is not a solution. Especially since it stems from the perceived need to salve the fears of whites who were left behind on the fringes of black neighborhoods. Talk is bullshit. Useless. We have a monumental economic catastrophe on our hands. Our cities never recovered from the post War social change.

I don't know whatever happened to Jack Kemp's Enterprise Zones but probably the only solution is some kind of Government/Industry partnership to bring jobs back to the cities beginning with assembly work that can be done by high school drop outs and single mothers. And we may need police and fire protection in the beginning. Also government subsidized property insurance for businesses in blighted areas. Maybe combining the schools with new industries. Otherwise, I do not have a solution either.

But, until the cities are revitalized economically interracial discourse is a waste of time because the unemployed do not trust the threatened and the threatened do not trust the unemployed. America cannot continue as a nation divided city from suburbs, blacks from whites. It is a national disgrace and disaster.





MrRodgers -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 8:05:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: erieangel

Try this on for size. Today's minimum wage is worth less in actual spending power than the minimum wage was worth in 1960. The poor, minimum wage earner, along with those on the margins, like myself, who make just above minimum wage, are worst off than ever before. And we have higher local taxes than ever before.





And a range of support entitlements and programs undreamed of, by the minimum wage earners of the 50 years ago.

I would like to see that list.

Actually I would add that inflation is the reason. Mostly caused by speculation and govt. acting in the interest of the ownership of production and not labor. Today's minimum wage would pay rent, food, clothing and transportation easily say 1900's to 1950.

As it was, rent for a 5 room row house was a fraction of your weekly pay, that's WEEKLY pay and as late as 1944-1945. Your fruits were 1 - 3 cents EA. Water was .18/1000 gallons as late as 1963. There IS your answer oh and the fortune 500 eliminating manufacturing jobs in the city and attained with a HS diploma.




TheHeretic -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 8:12:31 PM)

Little glitch with your quote trimming, MrRodgers. I didn't say that.




MrRodgers -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 8:15:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic

Little glitch with your quote trimming, MrRodgers. I didn't say that.

I want to see that range.




njlauren -> RE: What causes urban poverty (3/24/2013 8:26:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: njlauren
Lot of reasons, and it is complicated:
1)Communities that have been stripped of a variety of economic levels. For example, city policy with public housing put such restrictive income levels, in them that the ended up with the hard core, multi generation welfare type of people, kids were brought up around multiple generations who had never worked. When poor kids are around middle class people, working class people, they have role models, when they are around a lot of people not working, they are influenced by that.
2)Schools starved for funds, because school funding is based on property taxes.


What, then, is the fix? Who's to blame when property values in one school district drop when values in other districts stay the same or rise? Do failing schools share some the drop in property values?

quote:

4)Policies that shift jobs to suburban areas or to more wealthy areas of cities, that takes jobs out of the communities, hasn't helped. There are a lot of people who instead of looking at cities as a place where you can bring people together, where you can have a large job pool, see them as these cesspools and instead move jobs all over the place, then wonder why they have a hard time getting labor.


Part of the relocating business thing is that they do this to get into better areas (less crime, less risk of crime, etc.) or to move out to the suburbs where more of their employees live. And, there are times when higher paying jobs end up allowing people to move out of urban areas, which tends to lower the property values of the urban areas. And, then, to pay for all the services the poorer among us need, the urban areas have to increase taxes to pay for that stuff. And, as more and more people leave, the burden falls on fewer and fewer, leaving property owners/businesses to shoulder more and more. So, you end up chasing business into more friendly tax areas. And, that only exacerbates the problem.

So, the big question is, what can be done about it?

quote:

5)Low expectations, the idea that somehow inner city kids can't achieve, so they create social promotion, they make school into some sort of soft jail, rather than expecting the kids to learn.
6)With schools, assuming that it is as easy to achieve results in an inner city school as it will in a well off suburb, not recognizing the differences. Among other things, inner city schools tend to draw the most inexperienced teachers, rather than experienced ones, where more well off schools attract the better ones. It also creates a culture where teachers are kept in bad schools who don't perform, because they think they can't get replacements.


And then, if not enough "______" (enter socioeconomic classification of your choice) kids don't pass, the schools will be faulted and there will be racism and/or other forms of discrimination alleged. I agree that no group should have lower expectations than any other group. That's ridiculous from the get-go.

[sidebar] When there is proof that an action, policy, or test is discriminatory, then that action, policy or test needs to be fixed. This is easily seen with the SAT/ACT/IQ test (or whichever test it was) back in the 80/s/90's. [/sidebar]

quote:

If you really want to know? Do some research on Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the man wrote more books on the subject then most policy makers read....he had it nailed over 50 years ago, problem is, the conservatives read what he wrote and blamed the ills on the people, and the liberals were offended he aired the dirty laundry.








The answer is that property taxes are a horrible way to pay for schools, it puts the burden on too small a group and leaves is subject to the vagaries of the local economy, and it isn't just an issue for the inner city. Where I live, in a lot of towns, they put up new houses, that brought in people with families, and they suddenly found they had to expand the schools, which is costly, and long term residents found a tax bill on a modest ranch home doubled or tripled, which hurt senior citizens. It isn't broad based, it puts a huge burden on homeowners, and isn't fair since schools in an area with million dollar homes have a tax base many times that of a poor, inner city (or rural) area.

Unfortunately, then you run into the big bone of contention, towns want 'local control' of schools, then bitch about tax bills.....NJ has 660 school districts give or take, which is ridiculous......more importantly, if school funding is funded from income and other taxes, it comes from a wide base of people,and means that no one group of people will get snoggered.

Actually, the US is weird, we are the only country where education is left to the locals like this, all the countries we are competing with, the ones people make such big noises about,the South Koreas, Chinas, Indias, that are supposed to be turning out these fantastic students and such, all do it on a national level as does Europe. I realize it raises constitutional questions, but things like the fact that personal economics is one of the biggest indicators of academic success (in other words, no surprise, kids from better economic circumstances do better in school, duh).

In terms of business moving, it is complicated. Part of the problem is you end up with this idea of competing, of using tax breaks and other things to lure jobs from one place to the other, and it isn't always smart. Businesses in the burbs are located all over the place, and require driving, which clogs the roads, and people spend good parts of their days stalled in traffic, then the federal government funds widening highways and such, which ends up creating more traffic and jams....more importantly, a lot of these companies, because the burbs are expensive, end up having to build their own transportation, to bring people in for clerical and line jobs and such....it is a mess, that has unintended consequences, rather then looking at the region as the Regional Plan Association does, and realizing that jobs in the city provide economic benefit all over the place.....


There are no simple solutions, but the current system at best is a weak scaffolding, it isn't total collapse, but it isn't really working either.




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875