Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Amendment rights


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Amendment rights Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 1:46:56 PM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yachtie

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

McCarthy has always served as a Democrat, she did not change her voter registration from Republican until 2003. She got into politics and gun control after December 7, 1993 when her husband, Dennis, was killed and her son, Kevin, severely injured on a Long Island Rail Road commuter train at the Merillon Avenue station, when spree killer, Colin Ferguson. In her last election 2012, she got 138,561 votes winning her the election.


Plagiarize Wikipedia much?

On December 7, 1993, her husband, Dennis, was killed and her son, Kevin, severely injured on a Long Island Rail Road commuter train at the Merillon Avenue station, when spree killer, Colin Ferguson, opened fire on passengers.[4]




Never claimed it was mine and you are distrubing my lunch I am trying to enjoy a nice T-bone steak.

When something is submitted in written form, it is assumed to be the intellectual property of the writer. To cut and paste or take the writings of another without quoting or attribution is legally, ethically and academically considered plagiarism. A person with "multiple advanced degrees" should know that little factoid.

A-S-S-U-M-E-D

That is correct, "Assumed" in the legal, ethical and academic sense.

When someone submits a body of writing, it is legally, ethically and academically assumed to be their creation unless they cite the author.

To cut and paste or otherwise post the words of another without attribution is a very good legal, ethical and academic definition of the word 'plagiarism'.

I knew it was plagiarized because the word "Democrat" was spelled properly.


I did copy this
as•sumed ( -s md )
adj.
Taken up or used so as to deceive; pretended

You can put away your chicken costume, the San Diego Chicken has renewed his contract, they won't be needing you.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 1:49:01 PM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
When something is submitted in written form, it is assumed to be the intellectual property of the writer. To cut and paste or take the writings of another without quoting or attribution is legally, ethically and academically considered plagiarism. A person with "multiple advanced degrees" should know that little factoid.

LOLOL. OK, color me guilty because I grab shit from the internet all the time. I only tend to cite it when I think the supporting information added significant additional value. I pretty much don't cite stuff from wikipedia since that is high on everyone's google search results so whatever I found is likely to be found by anyone else.

_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 2:10:55 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

LOLOL. OK, color me guilty because I grab shit from the internet all the time. I only tend to cite it when I think the supporting information added significant additional value. I pretty much don't cite stuff from wikipedia since that is high on everyone's google search results so whatever I found is likely to be found by anyone else.


I don't see the need to argue over sourceing as this information in no way detracts from the fact that she demonstrated that she doesn't know what she is talking about.

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 2:30:06 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro



I did copy this
as•sumed ( -s md )
adj.
Taken up or used so as to deceive; pretended

You can put away your chicken costume, the San Diego Chicken has renewed his contract, they won't be needing you.

It appears that some people cannot even tell the difference between a word used as an adjective and a verb. Sentence structure is taught in the third grade.
From the online dictionary:

as·sume (-sm)
tr.v. as·sumed, as·sum·ing, as·sumes

6. To take for granted; suppose: assumed that prices would rise.

< Message edited by Hillwilliam -- 4/4/2013 2:31:33 PM >


_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 2:51:46 PM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro



I did copy this
as•sumed ( -s md )
adj.
Taken up or used so as to deceive; pretended

You can put away your chicken costume, the San Diego Chicken has renewed his contract, they won't be needing you.

It appears that some people cannot even tell the difference between a word used as an adjective and a verb. Sentence structure is taught in the third grade.
From the online dictionary:

as·sume (-sm)
tr.v. as·sumed, as·sum·ing, as·sumes

6. To take for granted; suppose: assumed that prices would rise.


You still did not get the chicken job.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 3:01:32 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

McCarthy has always served as a Democrat, she did not change her voter registration from Republican until 2003. She got into politics and gun control after December 7, 1993 when her husband, Dennis, was killed and her son, Kevin, severely injured on a Long Island Rail Road commuter train at the Merillon Avenue station, when spree killer, Colin Ferguson. In her last election 2012, she got 138,561 votes winning her the election.

Ooooo, another effectively gun-free zone! Getting a carry permit in New York City is all but impossible.

Thanks, carry on plagiarizing.

K.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 4:19:39 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Well since the left is quick to say that the Constitution won't be done away with and this country will never collapse, and the rule of law will always stand, what does it matter what I would or would not do.


You alluded to changes when and if the rule of law were to end...just seeking clarification.
As a point of interest could you tell us when in recorded history that scenario existed?


quote:

It's moot lol. By their view on things the condition subsequent would never occur. If the Constitution and Bill of Rights is destroyed do we still have an American nation or some diseased anti-American nation?

You do seem to exist in an "either/or" world...why is that?

quote:



How is communism and fascism anti-American, hmm really? Guess infringing on liberties and private property is completely American in your view, glad we don't share it.


Native americans dispossessed of their land and murdered,mexican-americans dispossessed of their land and deported.
Blacks dispossessed of their land and lynched...yeah that sort of shit has happened a lot here. How did gwb make his millions? Let me see oh yes stealing private property (eminent domain) to make a parking lot for a baseball team he was a minor owner of then selling his appreciated shares.
Who did the "commies disposs of their land???the aristocracy???(Who else owned land in russia ?)pretty much like the founding fathers this land was owned by the crown and crown franchises...failure to pay for those properties both private and public was one of the major causes of the war of 1812.


quote:

The days of the silent majority is gone. We're polarized now and your either for or against.


The "silent majority" is neither.

(in reply to TricklessMagic)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 5:23:35 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

McCarthy has always served as a Democrat, she did not change her voter registration from Republican until 2003. She got into politics and gun control after December 7, 1993 when her husband, Dennis, was killed and her son, Kevin, severely injured on a Long Island Rail Road commuter train at the Merillon Avenue station, when spree killer, Colin Ferguson. In her last election 2012, she got 138,561 votes winning her the election.

None of that makes her any less of a fucking idiot or you any less of a plagiarist.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 5:49:18 PM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

McCarthy has always served as a Democrat, she did not change her voter registration from Republican until 2003. She got into politics and gun control after December 7, 1993 when her husband, Dennis, was killed and her son, Kevin, severely injured on a Long Island Rail Road commuter train at the Merillon Avenue station, when spree killer, Colin Ferguson. In her last election 2012, she got 138,561 votes winning her the election.

Ooooo, another effectively gun-free zone! Getting a carry permit in New York City is all but impossible.

Thanks, carry on plagiarizing.

K.



I have noted in you definition of “gun free zones” you included military bases, immigration centers, American Native and a restaurant (that was in Texas and I have not know that State to be “gun free”). You would also include Amish and Sikhs, since both groups have has mass shooting. This only goes to show your bias in others religious belief. This is your pathetic attempt to prove yourself narrow minded beliefs and all other wrong.

You may also know the NRA at one time favored gun free school zone.

http://news.yahoo.com/step-pardon-scottsboro-boys-victims-gross-injustice-170034521.html?bcmt=1365106374035-2c719b09-4d0c-4a36-a06f-54c38bbd5f24&bcmt_s=u#mediacommentsugc_container

"effectively"? and how is the diaerrha and I don't mean your mouth.

< Message edited by Nosathro -- 4/4/2013 5:52:35 PM >

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 6:19:21 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

McCarthy has always served as a Democrat, she did not change her voter registration from Republican until 2003. She got into politics and gun control after December 7, 1993 when her husband, Dennis, was killed and her son, Kevin, severely injured on a Long Island Rail Road commuter train at the Merillon Avenue station, when spree killer, Colin Ferguson. In her last election 2012, she got 138,561 votes winning her the election.

Ooooo, another effectively gun-free zone! Getting a carry permit in New York City is all but impossible.

Thanks, carry on plagiarizing.

K.



I have noted in you definition of “gun free zones” you included military bases, immigration centers, American Native and a restaurant (that was in Texas and I have not know that State to be “gun free”). You would also include Amish and Sikhs, since both groups have has mass shooting. This only goes to show your bias in others religious belief. This is your pathetic attempt to prove yourself narrow minded beliefs and all other wrong.

You may also know the NRA at one time favored gun free school zone.

http://news.yahoo.com/step-pardon-scottsboro-boys-victims-gross-injustice-170034521.html?bcmt=1365106374035-2c719b09-4d0c-4a36-a06f-54c38bbd5f24&bcmt_s=u#mediacommentsugc_container

"effectively"? and how is the diaerrha and I don't mean your mouth.

When Libby's shooting took place Ann Richardson was Governer and she had gotten concealed carry outlawed so the resturunt was a gun free zone.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 6:39:13 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

I have noted in you definition of “gun free zones” you included military bases, immigration centers, American Native and a restaurant (that was in Texas and I have not know that State to be “gun free”).

A gun-free zone is an area where ordinary citizens (or ordinary soldiers in the case of military bases) are not permitted to carry a firearm, regardless of whether they have or would need a permit to do so. This includes schools, businesses that do not allow employees to bring guns into the workplace, malls and theaters and other places with a no-gun policy, an army base on home soil per army regulations, or a state where it's simply all but impossible to get a carry permit.

And as for Luby's cafeteria in Texas, concealed carry wasn't legal in Texas in 1991 when that shooting occurred, a fact which I noted in the post and which you would have seen if you had taken the fucking trouble to actually read it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

You would also include Amish and Sikhs, since both groups have has mass shooting. This only goes to show your bias in others religious belief.

I would? That's odd, I didn't. I mean, it's nice to have a hobby. But mind-reading? I liked the religious bias bit, though. Now that was funny, and very creative. With a little work, you could learn to pull a rabbit out of a hat.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

This is your pathetic attempt to prove yourself narrow minded beliefs and all other wrong.

And presumably this is your attempt at an English sentence?

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 4/4/2013 7:32:30 PM >

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 8:25:36 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

And as for Luby's cafeteria in Texas, concealed carry wasn't legal in Texas in 1991 when that shooting occurred, a fact which I noted in the post and which you would have seen if you had taken the fucking trouble to actually read it.


Luby's was, in fact, a major part of the reason Bush beat Richardson in the following election.
After this the legislature passed a concealed carry law for a vote by the people of Texas.
Richardson, in typical liberal fashion, vetoed the bill on the grounds that she could not "count on the people to vote the right way"

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 11:04:06 PM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline


Your continuing commits in an attempt to show “gun free zones” are ineffective are nothing more than ranting. Your replies only concern what you feel would make more of a personal attack then to promote anything meaningful. As you did not comment on the NRA supporting “gun free zones” but that would mean you would have to say something against your narrow minded biased views. I counter your ego by saying so what, being armed does not do anything either. Look at Texas, two armed DA gun down, the Police Chief of a West Virginia County was gun down in his police car and now Mississippi Detective are now dead, killed at the police station, he must have felt safe all those gun he forgot to search the suspect. Gee all in pro gun states, guns everywhere, and they are still dead. A lot of good guns did them, see guns did work; guns don’t scare the criminals away.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 11:13:39 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

I'm sorry, I'm having trouble reading that. Was it supposed to be English? I couldn't tell.

K.













< Message edited by Kirata -- 4/4/2013 11:14:50 PM >

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 11:35:04 PM   
Esinn


Posts: 886
Joined: 6/23/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

"There are people that shouldn’t have guns – angry liberals should not have guns.”

I find it most instructive that this punk ass mother fucker wants to limit the gun owning rights of his political opponents.


Are you an angry liberal, pumpkin? Show us on the doll where the evil republican touched you.

_____________________________

Let's break the law

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/4/2013 11:48:32 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro



Your continuing commits in an attempt to show “gun free zones” are ineffective are nothing more than ranting. Your replies only concern what you feel would make more of a personal attack then to promote anything meaningful. As you did not comment on the NRA supporting “gun free zones” but that would mean you would have to say something against your narrow minded biased views. I counter your ego by saying so what, being armed does not do anything either. Look at Texas, two armed DA gun down, the Police Chief of a West Virginia County was gun down in his police car and now Mississippi Detective are now dead, killed at the police station, he must have felt safe all those gun he forgot to search the suspect. Gee all in pro gun states, guns everywhere, and they are still dead. A lot of good guns did them, see guns did work; guns don’t scare the criminals away.

Only an idiot would not prefer that his victims be unarmed.

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/5/2013 12:35:35 AM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline
Here the "right" thinks only the ruling class should have access to or control weapons, the"left" thinks all classes should be authorized to have these weapons pursuant to some reasonable rules, which apply to all without regard to class who have a legitimate need for them.

Interestingly, here it is the "right" who wants more "gun control." The "left" doesn't have a problem with the appropriate firearms being legally available to those who met the criteria and follow the regulations.

Curious that those roles are reversed in the United States.

(in reply to Esinn)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/5/2013 1:10:40 AM   
Nosathro


Posts: 3319
Joined: 9/25/2005
From: Orange County, California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


I'm sorry, I'm having trouble reading that. Was it supposed to be English? I couldn't tell.

K.


Try reading this...if you can't I am sure someone will read it for you....not every place you claim is a "gun free zone"


The Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)) is a federal United States law that prohibits any individual from knowingly possessing a firearm at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a "school zone" as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(25). Its formal title is the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and is sometimes referred to as the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, possibly in reference to S. 890.









(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/5/2013 1:23:55 AM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro

Try reading this...if you can't I am sure someone will read it for you....not every place you claim is a "gun free zone"

The Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)) is a federal United States law that prohibits any individual from knowingly possessing a firearm at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a "school zone" as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(25). Its formal title is the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and is sometimes referred to as the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, possibly in reference to S. 890.

Try reading that. Pay attention to the color. If you cannot see the color, pay attention to the bold face type. If you cannot focus on the page, wait until you're sober.

Additionally, when you post something that you did not write yourself, please set it off with color or indentation, or put it inside quotation marks, and link the source. It's a matter of courtesy, both to the author and the reader. If you do not understand what courtesy is, I am sure someone will explain it to you.

K.


< Message edited by Kirata -- 4/5/2013 1:38:27 AM >

(in reply to Nosathro)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Ame... - 4/5/2013 2:49:45 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nosathro
Try reading this...if you can't I am sure someone will read it for you....not every place you claim is a "gun free zone"

The Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)) is a federal United States law that prohibits any individual from knowingly possessing a firearm at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a "school zone" as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(25). Its formal title is the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and is sometimes referred to as the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, possibly in reference to S. 890.

Try reading that. Pay attention to the color. If you cannot see the color, pay attention to the bold face type. If you cannot focus on the page, wait until you're sober.

Additionally, when you post something that you did not write yourself, please set it off with color or indentation, or put it inside quotation marks, and link the source. It's a matter of courtesy, both to the author and the reader. If you do not understand what courtesy is, I am sure someone will explain it to you.

K.



Yeah, because you did such a great job of showing him the proper way....

Here is that SOURCE that you should have used as an example. Pay attention to the color....

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Head of Pro-gun group calls for taking away 2nd Amendment rights Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125