Yayyyyyy Exxon (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 7:19:27 AM)

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/02/1810571/exxons-duck-killing-pipeline-doesnt-pay-taxes-to-oil-spill-cleanup-fund/

A technicality has spared Exxon from having to pay any money into the fund that will be covering most of the clean up costs of its Arkansas pipeline spill.
The cleanup efforts themselves took a sobering turn as crews found injured and dead ducks covered in oil.
The environmental impacts of an oil spill in central Arkansas began to come into focus Monday as officials said a couple of dead ducks and 10 live oily birds were found after an ExxonMobil Corp. pipeline ruptured last week.
“I’m an animal lover, a wildlife lover, as probably most of the people here are,” Faulkner County Judge Allen Dodson told reporters. ”We don’t like to see that. No one does.”
Exxon has confirmed that the pipeline was carrying “low-quality Wabasca Heavy crude oil from Alberta.” This oil comes from the region of Alberta where the controversial tar sands are located. Heavy crude is strip mined or boiled loose from dense underground formations that often contain a large amount of bitumen. This oil is very thick and needs to be diluted with lighter fluids in order to flow through pipelines. Reports have stated that at least 12,000 barrels of oil and water spilled into the town.
A 1980 law ensures that diluted bitumen is not classified as oil, and companies transporting it in pipelines do not have to pay into the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. Other conventional crude producers pay 8 cents a barrel to ensure the fund has resources to help clean up some of the 54,000 barrels of pipeline oil that spilled 364 times last year.

As Oil Change International said in a statement today:
“The great irony of this tragic spill in Arkansas is that the transport of tar sands oil through pipelines in the US is exempt from payments into the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. Exxon, like all companies shipping toxic tar sands, doesn’t have to pay into the fund that will cover most of the clean up costs for the pipeline’s inevitable spills.”


And people wanna bitch about EBT users buying steak once a month.... And get rid of the EPA
makes me wonder




hlen5 -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 1:08:41 PM)

It doesn't make me wonder.

Those in power can't see beyond the piles of cash offered for their campaigns. Those in the EPA are looking to shoot through the revolving door to the lucrative jobs big oil offers. Big Oil can't see beyond the next quarterly profits. Everybody's happy. Not.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 1:14:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/04/02/1810571/exxons-duck-killing-pipeline-doesnt-pay-taxes-to-oil-spill-cleanup-fund/
A technicality has spared Exxon from having to pay any money into the fund that will be covering most of the clean up costs of its Arkansas pipeline spill.
The cleanup efforts themselves took a sobering turn as crews found injured and dead ducks covered in oil.
The environmental impacts of an oil spill in central Arkansas began to come into focus Monday as officials said a couple of dead ducks and 10 live oily birds were found after an ExxonMobil Corp. pipeline ruptured last week.
“I’m an animal lover, a wildlife lover, as probably most of the people here are,” Faulkner County Judge Allen Dodson told reporters. ”We don’t like to see that. No one does.”
Exxon has confirmed that the pipeline was carrying “low-quality Wabasca Heavy crude oil from Alberta.” This oil comes from the region of Alberta where the controversial tar sands are located. Heavy crude is strip mined or boiled loose from dense underground formations that often contain a large amount of bitumen. This oil is very thick and needs to be diluted with lighter fluids in order to flow through pipelines. Reports have stated that at least 12,000 barrels of oil and water spilled into the town.
A 1980 law ensures that diluted bitumen is not classified as oil, and companies transporting it in pipelines do not have to pay into the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. Other conventional crude producers pay 8 cents a barrel to ensure the fund has resources to help clean up some of the 54,000 barrels of pipeline oil that spilled 364 times last year.
As Oil Change International said in a statement today:
“The great irony of this tragic spill in Arkansas is that the transport of tar sands oil through pipelines in the US is exempt from payments into the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. Exxon, like all companies shipping toxic tar sands, doesn’t have to pay into the fund that will cover most of the clean up costs for the pipeline’s inevitable spills.”
And people wanna bitch about EBT users buying steak once a month.... And get rid of the EPA
makes me wonder


A couple dozen ducks?!? I don't give a fuck?

They don't pay into the fund that cleans up spills and doesn't play for the cleanup themself? I DO give a fuck.




FunCouple5280 -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 1:17:19 PM)

Am I to understand that the owner/user of the pipeline isn't paying for the cleanup?




DomKen -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 2:53:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FunCouple5280

Am I to understand that the owner/user of the pipeline isn't paying for the cleanup?

they say they will but they are not compelled to
http://rt.com/usa/arkansas-spill-exxon-cleanup-244/




FunCouple5280 -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 3:06:47 PM)

Even if they are not compelled to, as long as they are paying I am not going to snark at exxon. I do agree they should be compelled for future events and the law should be updated.




MrRodgers -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 3:29:37 PM)

Both shipper and receiver should have joint liability. But the fact that Exxon is not paying into the fund is a corporate world fact.

There is a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profits i,e., minimize costs, so it's management's duty to reduce what's paid for anything...if they can.

This is yet another slice of life informing you that society exists to serve the corporation, not the other way around.




subrob1967 -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 3:36:01 PM)

Heaven forbid Exxon choose to pay the clean up costs themselves, rather than pay some over bloated bureaucracy to inefficiently spend more money than they need to[8|]




Real0ne -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 4:10:09 PM)

too bad individuals do not have that kind of clout
when its an individual the corps come in and clean it up regardless and send you the bill!






DomKen -> RE: Yayyyyyy Exxon (4/3/2013 4:27:37 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967

Heaven forbid Exxon choose to pay the clean up costs themselves, rather than pay some over bloated bureaucracy to inefficiently spend more money than they need to[8|]

And what happens in a few days when they declare the cleanup complete and leave? Where does the money come from to actually finish the cleanup? It will take years.

You might want to check out the mess they left in Alaska after they declared the Valdez cleanup finished.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875