fucktoyprincess
Posts: 2337
Status: offline
|
omg. If I were to ban all the things I see people wearing that I, personally, find hideous, the list would be very, very long. People should be free to dress how they want in public (excepting nudity laws, of course). So assuming these guys are in fact wearing underwear that covers all relevant parts - I just don't care if they want to wear their pants at the hips, below their hips, their knees, whatever. Let's just leave aside the discussion of how unflattering this look is. There is a lot of unflattering out there that goes unregulated. Why pick on this particular style of unflattering? What disturbs me more about this is the following: quote:
“Hopefully, it’ll get these young men to pull up their pants,” Terreborne council member Russell Hornsby told Yahoo! Shine of the saggy pants ban. Hornsby’s colleague John Navy proposed the ordinance after many constituents had called upon the council to do something about the pants problem. *** Hornsby added, “The problem is our young men are emulating prisoners. It sends a sign that you’re available for sex. It’s a bad example to set.” The idea that low-slung pants in prison signal some sort of sexual come-on is one long-held, widely disputed belief about the style’s origins. In other words, the main objection stems from a belief that the style is homosexual in nature. And if that is the case, I'm donating right now to the ACLU to fight this piece of legislation. Wrong.
_____________________________
~ ftp
|