DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: Owner59 quote:
ORIGINAL: TheHeretic Why focus on what some people think she might have stopped herself from saying, at the expense of the idiotic horseshit that actually did come out of her mouth? Oh the irony..... FR....I`d be more concered with the health of our GI`s,than a gaff. Unless that gaff came out of the mouth of someone with a capital R after his/her name. Don't forget that part. Nope....My concern would be with the GIs, and always has. If she were throwing them to the deaths,like republicans did.....I would have said the same about her.... Wow, when did the R's throw the soldiers to their deaths? I must have missed that one. Iraq......over 4 thousand.... It was in all the papers at the time.... Huh. Interesting. The House had 223 R's and 1 I. Yet, the bill passed 297 - 133 (with 3 not voting). How is it just the R's sent the soldiers to their deaths when there were only 215 "Aye" votes among the R's? 297 - 215 = 82. How is it that 82 D's voted "Aye" for the Iraqi War Resolution in the House, but the D's bear no responsibility for sending soldiers to their deaths? The Senate. That's where the D's did their darnedest, right? The Senate had 50 D's to 49 R's. Easy to block, right? Well, 48 R's voted "Aye." They had to convince 11 D's to vote "Aye" and pass it 60 - 40. Well, obviously, they were able to get at least 11 (considering the lone I voted "nay"). They got 29 (out of 50) D's to vote "aye." Yet, once again, it was only the R's that sent the soldiers to their deaths. This is perfect evidence that you are wearing partisan blinders.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|