Extravagasm
Posts: 230
Joined: 9/22/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
Aylee: re Leaflets . . . .We cannot promise that only these cities will be among those attacked but some or all of them will be, so heed this warning and evacuate these cities immediately. You and I both know such numerous simultaneous evacuations as described and decentralized, would be inconceivable. Perhaps would even cause the chaos that the allies were intending. I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, clearly you were not justifying, only citing. But back to the critical issue. My steadfast lifetime conclusion is that there is not a right to torture, since there is not an absolute right to another's info in the first place. It must be obtained voluntarily or by slight. You opine that the Japanese (and US) have a 'right' to torture info out. And I presume others you grant also have this 'right'. Sorry but I've spent my life trying to see where the absolute right to another's secrets derives from. International law has it quite the other way around. Microsoft has sued small nations over theft of information. Yes war changes some things. But it doesn't create that absolute right to another's information. At least nobody, including you, has ever hinted how. And my God, the trend just keeps stretching way out. Folks are even discussing absolute right to torture information from kid perpetrator in Boston. (Only if it's needed, LOL). Give me a break.
< Message edited by Extravagasm -- 4/23/2013 8:41:47 PM >
_____________________________
BDSM operates on submission. Not on love, fairness, or convention. The way to a Dom . . is to follow his karma, wallow in his grime, Swim in his heart.© Yeah, fantasy is not reality. That's how it gives direction to the truly gifted.
|