Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Zonie63 quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne I am saying the british and america (and a few others) worked hand in hand to start both world wars (and several others) to take over, occupy, or otherwise install their psuedo government. Strictly speaking, though, after World War I, there was no compelling reason or any real need for Britain or America to start a second war. They already won the First World War and had hegemony throughout the world (along with France). Germany was bankrupt and Russia was still reeling from World War, 2 Revolutions, and a Civil War. China was in similar dire straits. If their goal was to take over the world, they already accomplished that, and, if true, the only reason for the Second World War would be a testament to the incompetence of the Western Allied governments in their inability to maintain their advantage and their hegemony over world affairs. To me, that fact would indicate that they really weren't trying to build up any world wide empire, because if they wanted that, they could have just taken it - openly and without all the extracurricular falderal of a League of Nations, Kellogg-Briand Pact, Locarno Pact, or any of that stuff. If they were trying to build up an empire, then they botched it pretty badly. gotta keep your eye on the ball. You snooze you lose. it should be painfully obvious if you understand what this ^^^^^ means, that is what actually as in substantially took place with respect to that chart.
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment? Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality! "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|