Dzk

Dzk (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Introductions] >> Introduce yourself

Message

Dzk -> Dzk (5/2/2013 12:58:19 PM)
Hey What's going on? The names DZK as you can see, I'm hoping I can find a submissive woman who'd be willing to worship me and satisfy me.

stef -> RE: Dzk (5/2/2013 1:28:02 PM)
Yeah, good luck with that.

TieMeInKnottss -> RE: Dzk (5/2/2013 3:59:23 PM)
I will just go with "welcome"...don't want a gold lettered letter from the admins

OohAahMrs -> RE: Dzk (5/3/2013 7:53:09 AM)
Welcome d, hey, those girls are playing hard to get today!

MarineKitten -> RE: Dzk (5/3/2013 11:26:08 AM)
Oh really, and just what the fuck are you going to do for them? BDSM is a two way street.

katts3 -> RE: Dzk (5/3/2013 12:01:06 PM)
Well good luck with this one.The odds of finding on on CM is like finding a snowball in hell...BOUNTY

VideoAdminChi -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 7:33:52 AM)
FR, A number of posts that were not appropriate for Introductions have been removed. Introductions is a section of the forum for welcoming members that have introduced themselves regardless of experience or interest. It is unacceptable to bring negative attention to a poster or their profile. We ask that you refrain from making personal attacks, snarky responses and from making comments to address something you believe that member is doing wrong. Introductions is not a place to correct other members in any manner. Making suggestions that will help the new member have a better forum experience, in a friendly manner, is acceptable. Discussion is encouraged if that discussion is positive and without insult. If you find an introduction that prompts you to be unwelcoming, we ask that you pass that introduction up and not respond to it.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 7:45:46 AM)
Nice sentiments VAC. Although I agree with the premise, sometimes we do get people on here that are just plain idiots or have a face-palm attitude that we generally feel would not benefit the community as a whole. Are you saying we should let those types in without questioning their suitability?? Just give them complete carte-blanche to be an asshat and spoil it for many others? Whilst I agree there were some inappropriate comments on here and the OP's other thread - some of it was well deserved IMHO. Just my [sm=2cents.gif]

Rasciallymisty -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 7:52:12 AM)
Dang... got gold letters twice in one day...guess I am not so nice after all. [:D] Can I at least smh, promise I will smile well I do Chi??? [:D] Hey Dzk, Nothings going on just writing a nice welcome this time to you. The name is misty as you can see. I am sub but not into worshiping a Dom who wants to punch his subs in the teeth, as I sort like my smile with all my teeth. [:D] Good luck. a better tweaked message.. kar [:D]

ResidentSadist -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 8:03:07 AM)
I don't care if you came here to find worshipers and I wish you good luck with that. I don't care what rap you like . . . although 80s rap was awesome (Public Enemy, NWA, Run DMC, LL Cool J, DOC and all those others with 3 letter names like yours) I don't care if you are a swinger or a Dom or both. I don't care if you have a copy of Photoshop and can put DZK on your orange face. I just wanna know what the "Z" stands for? Welcome to the discussion side of CM.

VideoAdminChi -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 8:22:42 AM)
quote: Although I agree with the premise, sometimes we do get people on here that are just plain idiots or have a face-palm attitude that we generally feel would not benefit the community as a whole. Are you saying we should let those types in without questioning their suitability?? Just give them complete carte-blanche to be an asshat and spoil it for many others? Use the Report feature for posts that violate the TOS or section guidelines. Making suggestions that will help the new member have a better forum experience, in a friendly manner, is acceptable. Discussion is encouraged if that discussion is positive and without insult. Rasciallymisty just did a fine job changing two posts that were not appropriate for Introductions into ones that are. If you find an introduction that prompts you to be unwelcoming, we ask that you pass that introduction up and not respond to it.

ResidentSadist -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 10:04:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Rasciallymisty ....... I am sub but not into worshiping a Dom who wants to punch his subs in the teeth, as I sort like my smile with all my teeth......... He didn't say he wanted to punch his slave's teeth in. He in fact clarified things by saying "for woman who are into it" in reply to the other presumptuous responders that thought he wanted to go around slapping up all those that identified as slaves. Unfortunately the face slapping thread that got pulled before I could ask him clarifying questions like, "are you talking about smacking a bitch up or slapping her face?". Or ask him why he defined the difference between "slaves" and "women" when in fact he should have been talking about masochists and non-masochists . . . unless it was the smack a bitch up approach, in which case why leave out woman? And lastly, ask him if he recently read 50 Shades of Grey and presumed that slaves were somehow automatically also masochists that liked slapping? So feel free to worship him as you see fit because he really never said he wants to punch out anyone's teeth. If you have issues with getting slapped in the face . . . whether in punishment for being a presumptuous brat or for stimulation as in sexual foreplay . . . then you should accurately clarify your statements as well as he has his.

Rasciallymisty -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 1:17:31 PM)
Sorry Dzk for taking this off thread. Sorry Chi I know its against TOS to do so...and I so do not need another gold letter ;-) but I am just answer RS back. RS I only had one chance to read Dzk's other post that has been pulled, so I did not see where he clarified anything. I wrote him here that I would not worship A DOM {didn't say him} that wanted to punch his sub/slave in the mouth...as that is what the other forum title was. It seems to be something that would satisfy him, but sure would not satisfy me. The other thread said nothing of face SLAPPING...it said to PUNCH, a hugh difference there. If Dzk ask me to clarify anything I wrote to him I will be more than happy to. Also thank you kindly RS for telling me how I may worship him that was right kindly of you. Dang I wish I had known for all the years I have been on CM that I needed to go through you first I surely would have. { said with a smile}. Hoping your day is good one. Also Chi must have thought my new message okay because no new gold letter was awaiting me and she even said, "Rasciallymisty just did a fine job changing two posts that were not appropriate for Introductions into ones that are. " Smiling kar

Duskypearls -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 6:30:12 PM)
RS, I just did web search. Apparently Dzk is a popular rapper.

HaveWhipWillTrav -> RE: Dzk (5/4/2013 6:42:22 PM)
Hello guy who will have some trouble finding what he wants.

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.736328E-02