|
fucktoyprincess -> RE: Burial for Killers (5/9/2013 1:20:51 PM)
|
Dquote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady
quote:
ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
And if the family is not asking the body to be shipped overseas and WE insist that the body go, are you suggesting taxpayer money be used to ship this body overseas? We can't force the family to pay to ship the body overseas. In fact, I'm quite sure they don't have the money to do so. And since when do we burden a family of a criminal with additional unnecessary expense. Did we do this to the families of other criminals in the country? Tamerlan is the guilty party here. His uncle is not.
Again, I'm just looking at the practical considerations. If cemeteries are willing to bury other criminals (and they do - routinely - where do you think the bodies of other criminals in the U.S. that require burial go??? We outsource a lot of things, but I'm not aware of routine outsourcing of burial of criminals.) I'm simply asking for his body to be handled the way criminal's bodies are typically handled. Why should we do anything differently here, especially when doing something differently actually gives the terrorists a huge media opportunity? Talk about misguided.
You are either intentionally trying to be argumentative (poorly doing it, I will add), or you have horrible reading comprehension.
Do you understand that once the body was released to the uncle, the expense to citizens ended regarding what to do with the body? I have repeatedly stated that you simply can't have it both ways. Yet, you continue to change what you are saying.
I'm over it.
quote:
It is interesting to note that the city had to pay $50,000 in taxpayer money to keep the body sitting in the funeral home safely for 5 days - every day of burial delay cost the taxpayers $10,000. Again, how misguided was all of this when the same thing should have just been done 5 days ago?? People truly have no sense sometimes. People constantly complain about the way tax dollars are spent, but somehow, this is okay??? Just bizarre.
Again, is your reading comprehension faulting? I can't understand why you are intentionally trying to be misleading here.
The ten grand a day had nothing to do with "keeping the body sitting in the funeral home." It had to do with crowd control and the protesters.
Typically your posts at least make some sense. Here you have changed your "point" several times in an attempt to argue, and then posted the above in an attempt to further inflame people. What a waste.
Let me ask you this. Would they have needed the crowd control for 5 days if the body had been buried 5 days ago. NO. What part of that equation do you not get. THEY WOULD HAVE SAVED $50,000 IN TAXPAYER MONEY IF THEY COULD HAVE BURIED HIM SOONER. That is indisputable.
And let me also ask you this. If no one had been willing to allow the body to be buried in the U.S. what exactly would you have recommended to the uncle to do? How are you supposed to send a body overseas when Russia refuses the body (as someone has suggested) AND you couldn't have afforded to send it. What advice would you have given the uncle. I understand the body was released to him. I am talking about the practical issues involved that you don't seem to grasp.
If someone tells you you can't bury a family member anywhere in the U.S. can you please explain to me what exactly YOU would do in practical and realistic terms? How difficult is this to understand. A rotting corpse....what would YOU do.....keep it in your home??????? How bizarre that you think I'm being weird here. How many sane people keep rotting corpses in their homes. I guess that's what you would tell him to do, because I'm not sure what else he could have done. Maybe that's how you deal with your dead, but ewwwwwww [:D]
Thank goodness I come from a culture where we cremate. Most environmentally clean and safe way to dispose of a body......
|
|
|
|
