Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/10/2013 2:46:33 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
Immigration Enforcement Without Immigration Reform Has Been Failing for Decades

Link

Opponents of a new legalization program for unauthorized immigrants living and working in the United States frequently claim that we must try “enforcement first.” That is to say, we must adequately enforce the laws on the books before we can contemplate the formulation of more reasonable laws. This stance is nonsensical for two reasons.

First of all, it ignores the fact that the unworkable nature of our immigration laws is itself facilitating unauthorized immigration; so it is illogical to hope that stronger enforcement of those unworkable laws will somehow lessen unauthorized immigration. Secondly, the “enforcement first” perspective conveniently overlooks the fact that the United States has been pursuing an “enforcement first” approach to immigration control for more than two-and-a-half decades—and it has yet to work.

Since the last major legalization program for unauthorized immigrants in 1986, the federal government has spent an estimated $186.8 billion on immigration enforcement. Yet during that time, the unauthorized population has tripled in size to 11 million. This did not occur because $186.6 billion was not enough to get the job done. It occurred because this money was spent trying to enforce immigration laws that have consistently failed to match either the U.S. economy’s demand for workers or the natural desire of immigrants to be reunited with their families.

As a result, we keep throwing good money after bad, ignoring the old adage that “insanity” is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. More concretely, the federal government has met nearly every “metric” for border security that appeared in the 2006, 2007, and 2010 immigration-reform bills in the Senate, yet new metrics are continually created to replace the old ones, and the finish line keeps moving further away. The “enforcement first” approach to unauthorized immigration would more accurately be called “enforcement forever,” because there is no end in sight.



Conservatives are split, obviously. The irrational base hate's immigration. The smaller government types, civil libertarians, and business owners favor reform because they want to see the US economy grow and their businesses expand.




< Message edited by cloudboy -- 5/10/2013 2:58:41 PM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/10/2013 2:52:56 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

Here's another eye popping statistic:

The United States has created an enormous deportation machinery. The budget for border security and immigration enforcement in now $18 Billion dollars a year -- substantially more than the budget for all other federal law-enforcement agencies combined (the F.B.I., the D.E.A., the Secret Service, the U.S. Marshalls, and the A.T.F.).

The machinery exists, it has its political incentives, and because it targets are weak, its accountability is slight, its impunity is great.

--New Yorker P. 28. April 29, 2013

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/11/2013 9:46:59 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
So, what is the solution? Or is this a solution looking for a problem? Is the 'illegal' immigration of labor just a free market issue spawned by globilization and to be tolerated? Or is it a job killing issue like outsourcing that is destroying our working class? If the latter shouldn't it be stopped? Doesn't labor protectionism seem proper? Just asking.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/11/2013 2:18:06 PM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

So, what is the solution? Or is this a solution looking for a problem? Is the 'illegal' immigration of labor just a free market issue spawned by globilization and to be tolerated? Or is it a job killing issue like outsourcing that is destroying our working class? If the latter shouldn't it be stopped? Doesn't labor protectionism seem proper? Just asking.



The mass immigration is a function of the imperialism you advocate, much as it is in the EU, where countries like France, England and Spain are paying for their colonial conduct yet today.

This imperialism is akin to a great pyramid scheme, where the imperialist must divy up the spoils to pacify his population, much as the Romans had to provide grain and circuses to mollify their plebes. Once these home nations become great welfare states, their population becomes dependent on the ruling class largess, to the extent where they are incapable of supporting themselves or providing the military forces needed for further imperialism. Rome, who as a republic could have their military utterly defeated and yet could in a day form five legions in successful defense of the city against the victors became a welfare state where only fifty men were found who could legally wield weapons and stand to fight the foreign invaders under the latter emperors.

And each further enhancement of the welfare state, requires greater imperialism, as the welfare state becomes greater, fewer of the plebes are fit to expand it, and foreign mercenaries, people of f the occupied lands and proxies become of greater importance.

A nation where foreign slaves did the work, foreign craftsman produced the good,s foreign merchants and businesses controlled the commerce, and a handful of the aristocratic elite functioned as the ruling class, while the citizens became welfare dependent mobs, necessarily disarmed and disenfranchised.

In the United States and in England you see a similar course, where the government attempts to hand out resources and monies it not longer can afford to a growing class of dole recipients who produce little, have meager skills or technical education, consume great amounts, and whose only political motivation is legislate their class and economic status far beyond their actual importance to their nation.

Into this mix comes those displaced as the result of this imperialism, who are able and willing to do the work the plebes of today cannot do, and who are culturally able to live a economic lifestyle considerably more meager then that acceptable to the local remnants of the working class. Added to this is that they are able to accumulate the capital to form small businesses and craft and trades, a thing the resident plebes must struggle against both their current culture and oppressive taxation and regulation to do.

Finally, and most important to this decay, these immigrants are accustomed to the highly repressive colonial regimes and police states needed for this imperialism, and are able to function quite well and certainly better then the natives under the growing authoritarian thumbs of the aristocratic ruling class in the imperial mother land.

And in these cases, the ruling classes are entirely promiscuous, much as the Roman elites staffed their military, commercial, and government with those foreign to Rome, the United States corporations staff their meat plants, farms and such with these foreign refugees, and in England many of the work formerly performed by the English commoners is now done to an increasing extent by people from their empire and colonial remnants, while foreigners are the investors and businessmen.

Eventually the "tipping point" is reached, where the imperialistic nation is first reduced militarily and economically and then is forcibly faced with these impossible social, economic and political contradictions, and the ruling class can no longer play the plebes (who become little more than dole receiving drones, incapable of either productive work or military service) against the new working and middle classes.

The basic history of this is played out worldwide, Rome, the Turks, imperial China, Spain, etc. are there to see.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/11/2013 3:22:57 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


Conservatives are split, obviously. The irrational base hate's immigration. The smaller government types, civil libertarians, and business owners favor reform because they want to see the US economy grow and their businesses expand.




Just a crazy thought here, Cloudboy. How about not beginning your thread, by telling conservatives about our motivations?

I think you should also recognize the obvious deep divide about the issue on the liberal side, or be prepared to have it discussed in the mix.

I believe in immigration as a great strength of our nation, but it needs to be regulated in an intelligent and realistic way, and those who came here in contempt of our laws need to settle up on that somehow, before moving forward.

Our current system is a disastrous mess, and genuine reform needs to happen. I think such reform is going to have to include some people leaving whether they like it or not, and future people in similar circumstances getting their asses turned around at the border to begin with.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/11/2013 3:34:13 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TheHeretic


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


Conservatives are split, obviously. The irrational base hate's immigration. The smaller government types, civil libertarians, and business owners favor reform because they want to see the US economy grow and their businesses expand.




Just a crazy thought here, Cloudboy. How about not beginning your thread, by telling conservatives about our motivations?


Conservatives constantly pimp their position and it is clear for all to see and quote.

quote:

I think you should also recognize the obvious deep divide about the issue on the liberal side, or be prepared to have it discussed in the mix.

I believe in immigration as a great strength of our nation, but it needs to be regulated in an intelligent and realistic way, and those who came here in contempt of our laws need to settle up on that somehow, before moving forward.


Perhaps a closer acquaintance with the history of the u.s. might be of assistance.

quote:

Our current system is a disastrous mess, and genuine reform needs to happen.


No it is not, all that is necessary is to enforce the laws against hiring those who cross the border illegally.[/b

quote:

I think such reform is going to have to include some people leaving whether they like it or not, and future people in similar circumstances getting their asses turned around at the border to begin with.


If they would enforce the law the fed would reap windfall profits and the illegals would go home on their own nickle.
Only bigots and those ignorant of he law think otherwise.



< Message edited by thompsonx -- 5/11/2013 3:42:25 PM >

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/11/2013 3:40:09 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Immigration Enforcement Without Immigration Reform Has Been Failing for Decades

Link

Opponents of a new legalization program for unauthorized immigrants living and working in the United States frequently claim that we must try “enforcement first.” That is to say, we must adequately enforce the laws on the books before we can contemplate the formulation of more reasonable laws. This stance is nonsensical for two reasons.

First of all, it ignores the fact that the unworkable nature of our immigration laws is itself facilitating unauthorized immigration; so it is illogical to hope that stronger enforcement of those unworkable laws will somehow lessen unauthorized immigration. Secondly, the “enforcement first” perspective conveniently overlooks the fact that the United States has been pursuing an “enforcement first” approach to immigration control for more than two-and-a-half decades—and it has yet to work.


In the u.s. there are two kinds of illegal aliens. Those who have overstayed their legal visa and those who have crossed the border illegally.
If an employer employs one of the first type the fine is minimal,a few thousand dollars. If an employer employs one of the second type the fine is $250,000 and five years in the federal slammer (no parol)for each illegal alien employed.
Imagine any major company with a few hundred illegal employees.The board of directors goes to the joint for a few hundred years and the fed gets a ton of money in fines plus ricco comes to play if there is a history of this. That activates the assett forfieture laws.
Enforce the laws as they stand and no illegal alien will be able to get a job and thus with no employment they will go home.
Oh yes the 18 billion budget for border security can be put back in the general fund along with all the assets of the criminals who hire illegal alliens.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 5/11/2013 3:43:20 PM >

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/11/2013 3:44:59 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

This imperialism is akin to a great pyramid scheme, where the imperialist must divy up the spoils to pacify his population, much as the Romans had to provide grain and circuses to mollify their plebes. Once these home nations become great welfare states, their population becomes dependent on the ruling class largess, to the extent where they are incapable of supporting themselves or providing the military forces needed for further imperialism.

It is never surprising when academic and theoretical fabrications of history fail to meet the facts on the ground.

Every migration has both a push and a pull. The 'push' in the northward migration from Latin America is grounded in the continuing greedy exploitation of los indios pobres by the elite land owners especially in Chiapas but also from the other nations of meso-america aided without question by the military intervention of the Reagan presidency and the drug enforcement 'war' that continues to this day. Your people were thrown off their small farms! Face the truth. The Mayans mow our lawns.

The 'pull' came from my government looking the other way [$$$$] to allow major corporations to hire non-citizens at lower wages especially in meat processing, home building, and hospitality industries. Coupled with new technology that allowed for the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs to Asia, the insourcing of cheap labor from Latin America, and the Right to Work anti-union laws that proliferated from state to state battered our working class. We were never like Rome, not a nation of plebes taking the dole. Through the 1940s and into the 1970s we had a very industrious and productive work force. That productive workforce was badly injured by the factors I mentioned. Your analysis is so very wrong. Way off the mark of what really happened here. Amusing in conjecture but tragic in reality for our workers.

(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/12/2013 8:42:40 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Our current system is a disastrous mess, and genuine reform needs to happen. I think such reform is going to have to include some people leaving whether they like it or not, and future people in similar circumstances getting their asses turned around at the border to begin with.


Obama has deported nearly as many people during his short tenure in office as the US did in it's entire history. So, just to be clear, you want more government regulation, expanded government funding, and less support for measures that would grow the US economy based on your own regulatory morals (immigration laws are regulatory, not criminal).

It's a fallacy..... that's the whole point but it's what the base wants.

Just because you don't like a solution, doesn't mean it's not a solution. Enforcement is a fallacy and an expensive one at that.

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/12/2013 10:29:52 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Enforce the laws as they stand and no illegal alien will be able to get a job and thus with no employment they will go home.

lol well,.. that sounds logical & all but its wrong... the IRS gives out a taxpayer number to anyone that applies and wants to work as an independent contractor so toss yer theory in the trash can..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 5:36:11 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Enforce the laws as they stand and no illegal alien will be able to get a job and thus with no employment they will go home.

lol well,.. that sounds logical & all but its wrong... the IRS gives out a taxpayer number to anyone that applies and wants to work as an independent contractor so toss yer theory in the trash can..

Please show me where the possession of a tin entitles someone who has crossed the border illegally to work in the us. All the tin does is allow the illegal to pay ss,income tax etc. it does not authorize someone who has crssed the border to work here legally. The law against employing those who cross the border illegally are still in effect. Google land could be your friend here. You might also want to check some of the older discussions on this subject on this forum discussing where this law has actually been applied.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 5:48:40 AM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

It is never surprising when academic and theoretical fabrications of history fail to meet the facts on the ground.



Your last two OPs assiduously avoiding actual history in service to speculative ideology notwithstanding, of course.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 6:52:26 AM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Obama has deported nearly as many people during his short tenure in office as the US did in it's entire history. So, just to be clear, you want more government regulation, expanded government funding, and less support for measures that would grow the US economy based on your own regulatory morals (immigration laws are regulatory, not criminal).

It's a fallacy..... that's the whole point but it's what the base wants.

Just because you don't like a solution, doesn't mean it's not a solution. Enforcement is a fallacy and an expensive one at that.



Cloudboy, it's pretty obvious here that you have no idea what I think, what I like, or where I'm standing, regarding immigration reform. Whether I'll get back to offer my own views in more detail on this thread is up in the air (my plate overfloweth at the moment), but I can assure you that my position isn't anything like what you seem to be assigning.

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 9:37:13 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

It is never surprising when academic and theoretical fabrications of history fail to meet the facts on the ground.



Your last two OPs assiduously avoiding actual history in service to speculative ideology notwithstanding, of course.

Wow, didn't know you were keeping score. My point above was that the theory should match the reality on the ground. If you would care to defend the position that America is a nation of plebes being fed bread and circuses, have at it. If you have issue with my position that we had a strong working class until technology, globalization, outsourcing of jobs, and undocumented immigration wrecked havoc upon us and created a wider wealth disparity than ever before, have at it. If you have nothing to contribute to the discourse except some snarky remark then I politely invite you to butt out.

< Message edited by vincentML -- 5/13/2013 9:40:45 AM >

(in reply to Edwynn)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 9:46:50 AM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Enforce the laws as they stand and no illegal alien will be able to get a job and thus with no employment they will go home.

lol well,.. that sounds logical & all but its wrong... the IRS gives out a taxpayer number to anyone that applies and wants to work as an independent contractor so toss yer theory in the trash can..

Please show me where the possession of a tin entitles someone who has crossed the border illegally to work in the us. All the tin does is allow the illegal to pay ss,income tax etc. it does not authorize someone who has crssed the border to work here legally. The law against employing those who cross the border illegally are still in effect. Google land could be your friend here. You might also want to check some of the older discussions on this subject on this forum discussing where this law has actually been applied.

To correct you, I never said having a tin entitles someone to work in the US but it does mean businesses can hire them/their company to do work and not have to check if they are legal in the US or not.. which makes the law you were yakin' about ineffective.. and the main point is, if your govt actually wanted to stop illegals from working then they could but the fact is they dont want to stop it, ya know cuz them & their rich friends would have to pay a lot more for their groundskeeper service, etc etc..

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 10:58:05 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
[quotORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Enforce the laws as they stand and no illegal alien will be able to get a job and thus with no employment they will go home.

lol well,.. that sounds logical & all but its wrong... the IRS gives out a taxpayer number to anyone that applies and wants to work as an independent contractor so toss yer theory in the trash can..

Please show me where the possession of a tin entitles someone who has crossed the border illegally to work in the us. All the tin does is allow the illegal to pay ss,income tax etc. it does not authorize someone who has crssed the border to work here legally. The law against employing those who cross the border illegally are still in effect. Google land could be your friend here. You might also want to check some of the older discussions on this subject on this forum discussing where this law has actually been applied.

quote:

To correct you,


Lets get this straight you are not correcting me you are making clear your previously less than clear post

quote:

I never said having a tin entitles someone to work in the US but it does mean businesses can hire them/their company to do work and not have to check if they are legal in the US or not.. which makes the law you were yakin' about ineffective..


The law I quote is ineffective because it is not enforced.
One does not need to run a back ground check with the ss people. The law is quite clear. If you hire someone who has crossed the border illegally it is a federal felony punishable by a $250,000 fine and 5 years in prison for each violation.
How does having a tin make this law ineffective.
This law is ineffective because it is not enforced.



quote:

and the main point is, if your govt actually wanted to stop illegals from working then they could but the fact is they dont want to stop it, ya know cuz them & their rich friends would have to pay a lot more for their groundskeeper service, etc etc..



That displays an astonishing grasp of the obvious

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 5/13/2013 11:01:15 AM >

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 5:10:21 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

[quotORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Enforce the laws as they stand and no illegal alien will be able to get a job and thus with no employment they will go home.

lol well,.. that sounds logical & all but its wrong... the IRS gives out a taxpayer number to anyone that applies and wants to work as an independent contractor so toss yer theory in the trash can..

Please show me where the possession of a tin entitles someone who has crossed the border illegally to work in the us. All the tin does is allow the illegal to pay ss,income tax etc. it does not authorize someone who has crssed the border to work here legally. The law against employing those who cross the border illegally are still in effect. Google land could be your friend here. You might also want to check some of the older discussions on this subject on this forum discussing where this law has actually been applied.

quote:

To correct you,


Lets get this straight you are not correcting me you are making clear your previously less than clear post

quote:

I never said having a tin entitles someone to work in the US but it does mean businesses can hire them/their company to do work and not have to check if they are legal in the US or not.. which makes the law you were yakin' about ineffective..


The law I quote is ineffective because it is not enforced.
One does not need to run a back ground check with the ss people. The law is quite clear. If you hire someone who has crossed the border illegally it is a federal felony punishable by a $250,000 fine and 5 years in prison for each violation.
How does having a tin make this law ineffective.
This law is ineffective because it is not enforced.



quote:

and the main point is, if your govt actually wanted to stop illegals from working then they could but the fact is they dont want to stop it, ya know cuz them & their rich friends would have to pay a lot more for their groundskeeper service, etc etc..



That displays an astonishing grasp of the obvious

there wouldnt be "loopholes" if the govt really wanted to stop it.. businesses that use a contractor/subcontractor is under no obligation to check if the owner/tin holder is legal or not and those people arent hired as "employees"... which makes the existing laws you quote as ineffective as enforcement of them wont end illegal immigration as you claim it will.. or are you suggesting that anyone that looks remotely Hispanic be stopped and asked for "his/her papers"?

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 5:20:40 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: YN


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

So, what is the solution? Or is this a solution looking for a problem? Is the 'illegal' immigration of labor just a free market issue spawned by globilization and to be tolerated? Or is it a job killing issue like outsourcing that is destroying our working class? If the latter shouldn't it be stopped? Doesn't labor protectionism seem proper? Just asking.



The mass immigration is a function of the imperialism you advocate, much as it is in the EU, where countries like France, England and Spain are paying for their colonial conduct yet today.

This imperialism is akin to a great pyramid scheme, where the imperialist must divy up the spoils to pacify his population, much as the Romans had to provide grain and circuses to mollify their plebes. Once these home nations become great welfare states, their population becomes dependent on the ruling class largess, to the extent where they are incapable of supporting themselves or providing the military forces needed for further imperialism. Rome, who as a republic could have their military utterly defeated and yet could in a day form five legions in successful defense of the city against the victors became a welfare state where only fifty men were found who could legally wield weapons and stand to fight the foreign invaders under the latter emperors.

And each further enhancement of the welfare state, requires greater imperialism, as the welfare state becomes greater, fewer of the plebes are fit to expand it, and foreign mercenaries, people of f the occupied lands and proxies become of greater importance.

A nation where foreign slaves did the work, foreign craftsman produced the good,s foreign merchants and businesses controlled the commerce, and a handful of the aristocratic elite functioned as the ruling class, while the citizens became welfare dependent mobs, necessarily disarmed and disenfranchised.

In the United States and in England you see a similar course, where the government attempts to hand out resources and monies it not longer can afford to a growing class of dole recipients who produce little, have meager skills or technical education, consume great amounts, and whose only political motivation is legislate their class and economic status far beyond their actual importance to their nation.

Into this mix comes those displaced as the result of this imperialism, who are able and willing to do the work the plebes of today cannot do, and who are culturally able to live a economic lifestyle considerably more meager then that acceptable to the local remnants of the working class. Added to this is that they are able to accumulate the capital to form small businesses and craft and trades, a thing the resident plebes must struggle against both their current culture and oppressive taxation and regulation to do.

Finally, and most important to this decay, these immigrants are accustomed to the highly repressive colonial regimes and police states needed for this imperialism, and are able to function quite well and certainly better then the natives under the growing authoritarian thumbs of the aristocratic ruling class in the imperial mother land.

And in these cases, the ruling classes are entirely promiscuous, much as the Roman elites staffed their military, commercial, and government with those foreign to Rome, the United States corporations staff their meat plants, farms and such with these foreign refugees, and in England many of the work formerly performed by the English commoners is now done to an increasing extent by people from their empire and colonial remnants, while foreigners are the investors and businessmen.

Eventually the "tipping point" is reached, where the imperialistic nation is first reduced militarily and economically and then is forcibly faced with these impossible social, economic and political contradictions, and the ruling class can no longer play the plebes (who become little more than dole receiving drones, incapable of either productive work or military service) against the new working and middle classes.

The basic history of this is played out worldwide, Rome, the Turks, imperial China, Spain, etc. are there to see.



Most of those arriving in the UK have nothing to do with countries of the Empire. The reason they arrive is they are prepared to work for lower wages. capitalism has always looked to keep wages as low as possible by whatever means. Slave labour, child labour, cheap labour and finally outsourcing. Thats why much of the UK`s manufacturing industry has vanished. Other nations now do it cheaper.


(in reply to YN)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 5:35:56 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

there wouldnt be "loopholes" if the govt really wanted to stop it..


What loophole are we speaking of here?

quote:

businesses that use a contractor/subcontractor is under no obligation to check if the owner/tin holder is legal or not and those people arent hired as "employees"...


How is this a loophole? How does this change the law about hiring those who cross the border illegally?


quote:

which makes the existing laws you quote as ineffective as enforcement of them wont end illegal immigration as you claim it will..



How does it make the existing law ineffective?
The existing law was on the books before the reporting requirement. Thus the fact that they are not required to check is hardly relivant...



quote:

or are you suggesting that anyone that looks remotely Hispanic be stopped and asked for "his/her papers"?


No I am sugesting that the cops do some actual police work.

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" - 5/13/2013 5:41:37 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Thats why much of the UK`s manufacturing industry has vanished. Other nations now do it cheaper.


Cheaper as in slave labor?
As for english manufacture...I have one of your automobiles...one of the finest examples I have ever found, a mechanical marvel...nightmare(if you have to pay someone else to work on it)

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> The Fallacy of "Immigraton Enforcement" Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.105