Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Benghazi’ Killed 241 American Servicemen?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Benghazi’ Killed 241 American Servicemen? Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Benghazi... - 5/12/2013 1:41:52 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		Not that we`re expecting any kind of adult answer.....



"Benghazi wasn’t the scandal that the conservative right tried to make it out to be. Unfortunately, the Democratic president didn’t engage in a big cover-up, and the Republicans trying to score political points by shouting “Benghazi, Benghazi!” are rapidly becoming irrelevant. In the fact of that, it should be pointed out that this amount of supposed outrage is completely hypocritical. One way to illustrate this is using the Beirut Barracks Bombing of 1983, which occurred during, and was the fault of, the Reagan administration. The following image, which has been shared quite a bit recently, is referring to it:

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/05/09/why-were-republicans-silent-when-reagans-benghazi-killed-241-american-servicemen/#ixzz2T73UwYY9









_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 1:48:18 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		The New Yorker politely declares that Obama is full of shit on Bengazi

_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 1:53:36 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		Well that settles it.....

My recollection is the republicowards turned tail and pulled us out......


Yet no hearings and all those dead American GIs






_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 1:57:39 PM   
FelineRanger


Posts: 658
Joined: 9/4/2012
Status: offline 		Here's a better plan: Stop the partisan name-calling and acknowledge that both sides hide information that makes them look bad. Underneath the flag waving, all politicians are the same.

_____________________________

Bill

(in reply to TheHeretic)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 2:04:46 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		Who is hiding what?


The point of the OP is blatant naked craven hypocrisy....


When it gets committed daily........it gets called out, daily.




< Message edited by Owner59 -- 5/12/2013 2:07:13 PM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to FelineRanger)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 2:11:08 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline 		FR

Fairness compels me to note that George Will was pretty harsh about Reagan's leadership on the Beirut front:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1917&dat=19840927&id=5RIhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=LnQFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2363,2628995

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to FelineRanger)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 2:11:53 PM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline 		Are you kidding me???

Really... A a United States Marine Veteran, I can tell you that you, are full it shit...the two aren't even remarkably close and Conservatives DID fault President Reagan in his lackluster response. That fact you are even posting this tells me the Benghazi story has you worried. Especially the part about where President Obama was when it was all going down.

That said....

Are you telling me you have no qualms or issues about the way Benghazi was handled or was President Obama's reelection and covering Hillaryland for 2016 more important for you?

Go ahead...be honest.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 2:24:35 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline 		Mr. Regan blamed Beruit on a YouTube (or other form of mass communication) video and jailed the person with a midnight raid?

And by the way, Nikoula is still in jail yet Robel Phillipos, is out on bail.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 2:33:21 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		Your collective discomfitures are dually noted......





< Message edited by Owner59 -- 5/12/2013 2:37:10 PM >

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 2:49:42 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Not that we`re expecting any kind of adult answer.....



"Benghazi wasn’t the scandal that the conservative right tried to make it out to be. Unfortunately, the Democratic president didn’t engage in a big cover-up, and the Republicans trying to score political points by shouting “Benghazi, Benghazi!” are rapidly becoming irrelevant. In the fact of that, it should be pointed out that this amount of supposed outrage is completely hypocritical. One way to illustrate this is using the Beirut Barracks Bombing of 1983, which occurred during, and was the fault of, the Reagan administration. The following image, which has been shared quite a bit recently, is referring to it:

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/05/09/why-were-republicans-silent-when-reagans-benghazi-killed-241-american-servicemen/#ixzz2T73UwYY9









The answer to your question is that we were not it was a screw up from the word go but Reagan never tried to pretend it was anything else.
As to why it wasn't all over the internet . see if you can figure it out for yourself.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 2:55:17 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline 		Bama, I did include, "other form of mass communication." But Owner seems to think that Mr. Regan blamed a Summer Stock production for Beirut.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 3:00:07 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Bama, I did include, "other form of mass communication." But Owner seems to think that Mr. Regan blamed a Summer Stock production for Beirut.

Owner will blame anything that he hopes will take the heat off of Obama.
The logic used here would say that I could kill my ex wife and should get off because O J did.

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 3:01:42 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Are you kidding me???

Really... A a United States Marine Veteran, I can tell you that you, are full it shit...the two aren't even remarkably close and Conservatives DID fault President Reagan in his lackluster response. That fact you are even posting this tells me the Benghazi story has you worried. Especially the part about where President Obama was when it was all going down.

That said....

Are you telling me you have no qualms or issues about the way Benghazi was handled or was President Obama's reelection and covering Hillaryland for 2016 more important for you?

Go ahead...be honest.




So please FDD.....what is it we`re worried about.....tell us.


The suspense is killing us.....


What has us soooo afraid....


You and your party`s lack of specifics about that, tell us you`re full of it.


You guys act like it`s us bring benghazi up....

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 3:03:13 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Bama, I did include, "other form of mass communication." But Owner seems to think that Mr. Regan blamed a Summer Stock production for Beirut.

Owner will blame anything that he hopes will take the heat off of Obama.
The logic used here would say that I could kill my ex wife and should get off because O J did.



Awwww...

I know it sucks to be a republican....

NOT......my problem...

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 3:03:46 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

Are you kidding me???

Really... A a United States Marine Veteran, I can tell you that you, are full it shit...the two aren't even remarkably close and Conservatives DID fault President Reagan in his lackluster response. That fact you are even posting this tells me the Benghazi story has you worried. Especially the part about where President Obama was when it was all going down.

That said....

Are you telling me you have no qualms or issues about the way Benghazi was handled or was President Obama's reelection and covering Hillaryland for 2016 more important for you?

Go ahead...be honest.




So please FDD.....what is it we`re worried about.....tell us.


The suspense is killing us.....


What has us soooo afraid....


You and your party`s lack of specifics about that, tell us you`re full of it.


You guys act like it`s us bring benghazi up....

No it is you guys coming up with lame excuses.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 3:12:27 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Bama, I did include, "other form of mass communication." But Owner seems to think that Mr. Regan blamed a Summer Stock production for Beirut.



The 241 GIs are just as dead....and still are.Are going to tell us now.......... that it doesn`t make any difference?



The point of the OP was the republican reaction to the republican president......no need to pretend no one can read between the lines on that....



Could you tell us why this youtube point is so important....


Explain it as if the reader had no fucking idea what you`re talking about.....


As if cryptic references and non-facts are not automatically understood.


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 3:16:35 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

Bama, I did include, "other form of mass communication." But Owner seems to think that Mr. Regan blamed a Summer Stock production for Beirut.



The 241 GIs are just as dead....and still are.Are going to tell us now.......... that it doesn`t make any difference?



The point of the OP was the republican reaction to the republican president......no need to pretend no one can read between the lines on that....



Could you tell us why this youtube point is so important....


Explain it as if the reader had no fucking idea what you`re talking about.....


As if cryptic references and non-facts are not automatically understood.


Because were Regan treated it as an act of terror and a lapse of security Obama tried to pretend it was a demonstration over a youtube film that got out of hand and I might add it was dear sweet Hillary who said "what difference does it make"

And Republicans were not silent over Lebanon.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 5/12/2013 3:18:53 PM >

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 3:27:03 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline 		Tried to pretend?Projecting...much?

When he found out that wasn`t the case,he said so...

Even fox news said they thought that was the case...

He was going by the best intel at the time....

This sinister narrative that he purposely let Americans die or tried to cover up something is not credible.....

But of course if one is in to pretending.....facts,the record and history don`t play a big role.


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 3:46:15 PM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Tried to pretend?Projecting...much?
When he found out that wasn`t the case,he said so...
Even fox news said they thought that was the case...
He was going by the best intel at the time....
This sinister narrative that he purposely let Americans die or tried to cover up something is not credible.....
But of course if one is in to pretending.....facts,the record and history don`t play a big role.


So, from the get-go, he was all about "this was a terrorist attack?"




_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Beng... - 5/12/2013 4:37:31 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

Yet no hearings and all those dead American GIs


You are mistaken. Those are dead marines...not the same.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Why Were Republicans Silent When Reagan’s ‘Benghazi’ Killed 241 American Servicemen? Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

1.031