Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Is rape about power?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is rape about power? Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/25/2013 2:23:12 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
Powergamz1,

See Peon's post. Have a look at his bean analogy. Something may become clear to you.

Apart from that, the rest is a mix of general dishonesty and poor reading comprehension that doesn't merit any other reply than to suggest that interested readers can have a look at what you and I have been saying throughout this thread, then make up their own minds based on the evidence, without the inane commentary and ad hominems.

As for you, this was your third strike and you're out of my sight. Cease and desist further communication. I will do the same.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Powergamz1)
Profile   Post #: 181
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/25/2013 2:35:52 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: calamitysandra

I perceived Aswad as stating that power is not the only, and often not the most useful motivator of rape to analyse if you are looking for ways to lessen the incidence of rape.


Absolutely correct reading.

I've been on the topic of motive, or Bewegkräften, if you will.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to calamitysandra)
Profile   Post #: 182
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/25/2013 7:30:04 PM   
RemoteUser


Posts: 2854
Joined: 5/10/2011
Status: offline
I will confess to having only read about two thirds of this entire thread, but nowhere have I seen the concepts I have floating around in my head. So...

I think the perception of rape as power only applies when being approached from within the confines, rules and decor of an established social organism. If you strip away the social structure that lays down such concepts as morality, rape serves a more basic role in social construction (as opposed to something within the established "norm").

Animals, for example, don't have highly sophisticated moral structures, but they have demonstrated the capacity to create sophisticated social structures. If a dog pounces on another dog and has its way, there's no concern for consent, no need to define power beyond a peck order (I like the original term better, it did come from the study of chickens after all). Forced sex in this instance is about setting a chain of command that determines things such as rights to food and to further the genetic pool (albeit on a non-conscious level).

In fact, it makes the argument that sex without consent establishes who has the right to have sex in the first place, which aligns it in an odd parallel fashion with the point of consensual sex (from a species perspective - this is a view outside of established social mores and is unencumbered by a need to create "sexual freedom" by circumventing procreation).

Yes, we humans have evolved, and yes, we're not animals. As such we feel the need to organize, classify, justify and control through definition and the generation of consequences. We still have the "lower" brain functions, however, the basic urges inherent in any complex organism that made it past the single-cell stage (and an argument can be made for those, as well). There are "by and large" rules that are applied across cultures, but not every culture is built with the same moral foundation, nor are laws written or regulated in a single ascribed manner. It is possible that the rapist, in this circumstance, may justify with a personal moral code that rejects the shared views. This only makes what lies under the humanity more significant, I suspect. Everything has to have a base. If that base is taken simply as power (and what a loose term that is) then yes, establishing a peck order is such a method.

I'm not saying rape is a good or proper thing, here - quite the opposite, really, as my view is cast on what is left when morality and propriety vanish. I would venture to suggest that it is meant as a primal action, lower than consciousness, which, in a higher-functioning organism like a human is a mere aberrant action to the thing we call, normal.

On a quirky side note, I perceive that the same thing can happen in text, as well. The peck order seems prevalent amongst the recent thread pages. Funnily enough, it too is unencumbered by a moral imperative, although the social ranking it establishes must certainly be part of the equation.

We are funny beings.


_____________________________

There is nothing worse than being right. Instead of being right, then, try to be open. It is more difficult, and more rewarding.


(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 183
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/25/2013 8:13:41 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
Getting back to the topic, I have a question for the male audience:

Why do you care if she consents?

This is a serious and radical question that bears serious reflection.

As RemoteUser pointed out, caring about consent isn't the default state of affairs. Most of what we consider "being human" is actually taught at some point, internalized from the environment. This is alluded to in the phrase "a whole human". If we want to stop seeing the default behavior, we need to figure out what addition to the default makes the outcome something other than rape, and start imparting that addition to those that haven't assimilated it from their environment and those that have been in an environment that doesn't have this addition.

So, seriously, ponder that question. Going with Peon's bean analogy, if you've got the can sitting right there on the table, and you're a little bit peckish, why don't you just dig in? Opening the can is easy enough, and you've got a fork, so this is meal ready to eat. Clearly, some do just dig in, under various circumstances. That even seems to be the default behavior for our species. So what's different about you? What makes you better than this?

People that rape aren't defective. They're just missing something extra that others have. Something that can be imparted.

That's the part I want to isolate, so we can actually make some progress in reducing the occurence of rape.

IWYW,
— Aswad.

< Message edited by Aswad -- 5/25/2013 8:17:08 PM >


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to RemoteUser)
Profile   Post #: 184
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/25/2013 8:50:32 PM   
RemoteUser


Posts: 2854
Joined: 5/10/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

Why do you care if she consents?


Faintly, over the verdant hills that sprawled conspiratorially in the distance to hide the rising sun, was heard the cry of monogamous indigenous:

"Repeat business!"

(This post was sponsored by the Lords of Agriculture, who emphatically state that a can of beans depletes, but a garden is forever - or at the very least, seasonal.)

_____________________________

There is nothing worse than being right. Instead of being right, then, try to be open. It is more difficult, and more rewarding.


(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 185
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/26/2013 3:16:25 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Aswad


quote:


very few humans possess the faculties to improve their own thinking without being taught


I think you underestimate humans here, or the world would move at a much slower pace! But I agree that education is one of the keys, to counter other education, to for example rape culture.


Changing a culture takes time, though, and people with courage.

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 186
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/26/2013 3:23:40 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Your thoughts on privilege seems to me consistent with some some strict religious societies with pronounced gender roles.


That seems a strange observation to me. Those weren't really thoughts so much as a rehash of standard ideas about privilege amongst sociologists regarding western societies. The whole point is that these privileges aren't 'taught' in the 'schoolbook' or 'church doctrine' of the term 'taught'. By the time adulthood is reached, they're taken for granted as 'normal' and 'natural'. They're not consciously thought about.




But as you said, you can be conscious of privileges or not. Some religions do privilege one gender.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 187
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/26/2013 4:13:46 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess


quote:


Men and women have sex drives. And each and every man does NOT have a sex drive that is higher than each and every woman. So using sex drive as the construct doesn't really tell me anything. Yes, we all have sex drives and people like to have sex. What does that have to do with informing us about boundaries, consent, etc. In my mind, nothing at all.


Sex drive was never meant to be the only motivation, it was just one of the questions. It is not power versus sex, in my discussion. I do not believe in any ONE motive or reason.

You are quite right that the sex drive for men and women is the same, something not many have touched on. But of course you can argue that if both have the same sex drive, but only one party is strong enough to overpower the other, that could be why men rape women and rarely the other way around.

Personally I cannot but see that sex would have to come into it in some cases.

Power as a motive is still unclear to me: does it mean that it makes the rapist feels powerful when he rapes?

quote:


If we believe rape is just about sex drive then one way to control this is to cover women up - i.e., remove the visual cues to sex drive for men who are 90% of rapists. This seems ridiculous to me.


Again - and again and again - NO, asking women to cover up is no answer to rape. The rapist is the one responsible, not the women, and there is no reason why women should cover up and NO seduction theory implied here.

There is every reason to educate against the rape culture, that seems to make rape ok to so many people.

quote:


When I think about it in terms of power it tells me the way to educate both men and women is about the power dynamics involved - now we have the issues of boundaries, consent, respect, etc. all show up. And unlike sex drive which is the same construct for both women and men, power, because of certain natural attributes and evolutionary biology is different for men and women. Understanding rape requires understanding the sources of power that each gender has, and how rape violates the power balance. Again, the construct of sex drive does not tell us anything. A woman with a sex drive can still be raped. A woman can be attracted to someone physically but still not want to have sex with them at a particular time and place. Power seems to me a much better construct to use when discussing things like date rape. Again sex drive tells me nothing. Two people out on a date who are attracted to each other. Sex drive kicks in. So what? This doesn't mean a woman has consented to sex. And if a woman says "no" and a man overpowers her, his is doing exactly that. Using his sources of power to obviate hers.


We seem again to mix physically over powering someone, and discussing power balances between genders in society in other terms.

Maybe the word 'power' obscures what you mean rather than clarifying it. What about 'right'? Some men seems to feel that if a session has gone on long enough, or if they had previously perceived a 'yes', then they have a right to continue.

It is important, IMO, to educate children and young men in the concept that no one has a right to sex, regardless of the circumstances. I do not know if you would call that a question of power, I would not.

quote:


This is really not something very complex that is being stated here. In fact, I am starting to think it is because of its very simplicity that some on this thread are willfully denouncing it. Sometimes the simplest explanations are the most powerful.


I don't know what you mean by willfully denouncing anything, people simply explain their thoughts on the matter. But simple statements to complicated matters are not always a very good idea.

quote:


Using power as a construct leads me to all the right conclusions about education, prevention, post-rape counseling, etc.


As for education a lot of people seem to arrive at that conclusion from various starting points, and I think that is a very good form of combating not just the rape culture, but also simple misunderstandings as voiced by young men on some sites - men asking for advice and information.

Counseling - there I do not see it.

quote:


Again sex drive doesn't tell me how to counsel a post-rape victim (something that I have done as a volunteer). Sitting around talking about sex drive is NOT going to make a rape victim feel alright about what happened.


Can anything make it ok?

quote:


Talking about power makes it very clear exactly what happened and what the relative responsibilities were and how well or not well those responsibilities were handled. And this applies whether it is stranger rape or date rape or marital rape.


If you mean trying to teach people that the rape is not their fault, I do not see the difference. It is never their fault, no matter who you define rape or explain it reasons.

quote:


How many of you who are attacking the power construct have dealt in any real capacity with either rapists or rape victims (either as counselors, doctors, lawyers, etc.)? I think some of you could use some real life exposure to people on both sides of the rape equation before jumping so quickly to the idea that power is NOT the construct.


This discussion is not aimed at professionals, but at people in general who are interested in what makes other people rape. This is important for the whole attitude among people.

That said, no counselor or doctor or lawyer can claim to know the reason for rape, let alone one reason for rape. The power theory is an ill explained theory which is mostly aimed at getting the focus from the victim to the rapist, but it has never been either proven or even properly explained.

To get the attention away from the victim as in a lot of blaming and pointing fingers is important, but you do not need to go on with the power theory to do that.

People here are not 'attacking' that theory, they are discussing it, and if I ready them right, they simply say that this theory is not sufficiently helpful to help explain or combat rape.

quote:


Here are your questions:


Is it power? YES

Is it a bad attitude about women? (or other men)? YES and misogyny would be part of the power construct

Is it purely about sex? NO

Is it punishment? YES and punishment would be part of the power construct

Is it bad upbringing? Culture? Religion? POSSIBLY - but partly because people don't always understand rape to be about power; and culture and religion often focus on the wrong thing - on sex drive and trying to reduce that (e.g. by covering women up, by not allowing women to go out, etc.)

Is it because men cannot control themselves? Control is the flip side of power - when we have power we can choose to use it or NOT

Is it because men have a right to sex and therefore to take it where they can? This is POWER

Is it, as some EPs would have it, all nature and natural? NO


If I sum this up, what the theory of power as reason for rape is about is: misogyny, punishment and using control or not.

Can you help me further, and spell this out in a coherent theory? Is it all about hatred?

quote:


The whole point is that she has power that is ignored by the man.


This does not make sense to me. A power cannot be ignored.

quote:


Most of these questions raise issues that are just about power, but simply phrased in another way. The others relate to education - and the only way to educate is to understand what you are educating about.


The whole thing would be easier to understand if it were spelled out in one coherent theory.

Men rape because:...?


It was originally a political theory, meant to shift the focus, not a social or scientific one. I think it has helped shift the focus quite a lot along the way, but now we need some actual facts about rape to work with.

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 188
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/26/2013 4:14:51 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

This is really not something very complex that is being stated here. In fact, I am starting to think it is because of its very simplicity that some on this thread are willfully denouncing it. Sometimes the simplest explanations are the most powerful.


People often can't see things not because they're so abstract and away in the distance, but because they're so right up close to the front of the nose. Psychology 101. ;-)



If you understand this theory, can you explain it please? What does it mean that rape is about power? Men rape because:.........?

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 189
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/26/2013 4:17:59 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Aswad
ORIGINAL: egern

quote:


Seems to me you keep mixing the actual act of rape - which of course implies power, physical overpowering or a weapon - and the motive for rape, which is what I am talking about.


Seems to me they're positing power as the motive, as well, and that it's universally implied as part of the motive.

Some people see taking something because one can as an act of power. Others, like me, see it as an act of weakness. More to the point, I reject that the root cause, the initial motive, is "because I can". Indeed, it would offend me less (but still be offensive) if the motive truly were "because I can", rather than the violation being callously secondary to the true motive, which is what seems to be the case with many I've interviewed about rape.

IWYW,
— Aswad.




I too would see is as a weakness on so many levels..


(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 190
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/26/2013 4:23:47 AM   
egern


Posts: 537
Joined: 1/11/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

Ditto for me, I've read this entire thread and do not see Aswad in the way you are. I wouldn't say flouncing...more like seeing that y'all disagree and he has enough sense to not engage in useless bickering that is not contributing to the thread.

Op, I think rape is about power.



Can you elaborate?

(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 191
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/26/2013 1:36:27 PM   
VideoAdminChi


Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline
FR,

This thread is now unlocked. A post that derailed the thread and responses to it were removed. If your content is still relevant and you would like it back, please write to me. (And be patient ;)

(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 192
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/26/2013 4:31:26 PM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: egern

I think you underestimate humans here, or the world would move at a much slower pace! But I agree that education is one of the keys, to counter other education, to for example rape culture.  Changing a culture takes time, though, and people with courage.


You neglect the «without being taught» part.

The point of culture is that it is a collective teaching of a (local) consensus. Changes originate with one or more exceptional individuals and/or subcultures, then propagate through the host culture, sometimes causing domino changes to follow, including lowering the threshold for new ideas in the same vein as what the initial change belongs to. A simplification, but it will suffice. So, no, I don't underestimate humans; I recognize the merits of diversity and division of labor, of interaction, and so forth.

Respect for women, and respect for their decision as to whether or not to consent, is a somewhat novel thing in Western traditions, and indeed the term rape used to refer to stealing another man's property, with the woman being little more than an afterthought, if that. As such, it is important to realize that the callousness of rape is nothing new. That allows us to recognize that the only thing that has changed is the addition of something new to our culture, which is a perfect time to reflect on the utility of more explicit instruction, as there have always been those that have less ability to learn through the usual process of sublimation / assimilation from their host culture.

Anything we understand can be taught, so let's understand why most men care about consent.

With that understanding, we can teach others to care about it, as well.

And without reference to power, to boot.

IWYW,
— Aswad.


_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to egern)
Profile   Post #: 193
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/28/2013 7:45:45 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: egern

If I sum this up, what the theory of power as reason for rape is about is: misogyny, punishment and using control or not.



Yes, Bingo! In other words "power" basically sums up all one needs to know about rape (both the motives and the act) in order to prevent it, legislate it, punish it, etc.

Your own discussion simply proves the point many of us are trying to make on the thread.

And the rest who say "power" is NOT the construct have not come up with any alternative construct that holds up to the same scrutiny.

Again, those of you who reject "power" - then what, exactly is the construct?

And why search so hard for a construct when "power" works? Seems to me a lot of effort for naught.


_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to egern)
Profile   Post #: 194
RE: Is rape about power? - 5/28/2013 8:36:54 AM   
YN


Posts: 699
Status: offline
As one familiar with the investigation and prosecution of rapists, I will say each rape is it's own case in terms of the rape and those raping. Much as criminal homicides have a wide variety of motives.

Some rapists act primarily from intoxication, some out of mental defect,; some out of revenge or retaliatory motives; and some as a show of "masculinity;" some out of a contempt for the victim's class, race, etc.; and many are a combination of one or more of these motives.

However power (force) either direct, implied or threatened or must be used to compel the victim to submit, so power or force is a necessary component of the rape as it is defined worldwide.

(in reply to fucktoyprincess)
Profile   Post #: 195
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Is rape about power? Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 9 [10]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094