DesideriScuri -> RE: 16% verse 50% (5/20/2013 1:14:14 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: joether quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote:
ORIGINAL: joether The President had a pretty hard week, last week. Three big problems that were only added on by the GOP. But the curious issue I keep wondering is....WHY....do we the American people even listen to any of these GOP members that are in Congress? You might have heard that the President's numbers are in the 50-53% Range. While the whole of Congress (that would be both Democrats, Independents AND Republicans) is hovering at 16%. In fact, Americans seem to score Republicans (14%) worst than Democrats (19%). So you may or may not like how the President is doing, but at least half the nation thinks he's doing an 'o.k.' job. Were as with Congress, 4/5 people in the nation think they are sucking at their jobs. So the question I have is, would you take.....ANYONE....in Congress seriously when they try to bash the White House for....ANYTHING? I don't know that that's a fair comparison, actually. Think about it. When you are asked about your support of Congress, you are being asked to rate 537 people while you only have the opportunity to elect 3? Is anyone surprised that the numbers are so low? How do the elected officials rate according to their constituents? That would be a much more accurate comparison. 304M (or so) people have 1 President out of 1 total Presidents to rate. Do you get to elect the President's Cabinet? How about the US Supreme Court? If the Executive or the Judicial approval numbers were 16%, would you be 'flipping mad' about it? Oh hell yeah! Yet, your 'ok' with Congress, the third branch of our government sinking down to one third the approval numbers of the other two branches? Maybe we as Americans ought to hold the whole of Congress to the same standards as the other two branches. Right now, it seems the Republicans are pulling down the numbers more than the Democrats. This 'Benghazi' thing is to the current Republicans, what 'Iraq' was to Republicans a decade previous: takes your attention off how badly they are doing their jobs! "Look over here, DONT, look over there!" is the message they are pushing. You can only elect three point, right? Yet, how many of them are lawyers? How many of them are NOT rich? Does that sound like an accurate picture of America? Isn't Congress the branch for all Americans and not certain Americans? An when its time to elect someone to represent us in Congress, the field is only a half dozen? Your going to tell me that there are only a half dozen able-bodied, intelligent persons in your state qualified for the position(s)? How about we restrict all campaign spending to only 1/10th of what the position pays? And if your not supporting yourself, but others, its restricted to 1/2 that amount for ALL candidates? We have seen countless times in which 'money talks' and Americans lose every time. Would certainly force people to 'live within their budget', wouldn't it? After all, can you take someone seriously who 'spends high on the hog' to get elected, and then demand them to 'balance the US budget'? How many years has that budget been in a deficit? Twelve years now? Do we judge the President on the popularity of the SCOTUS? his Cabinet?
|
|
|
|