njlauren
Posts: 1577
Joined: 10/1/2011 Status: offline
|
I think it is one of those questions that is kind of left in the person's head, in terms of what they consider themselves. I had seen deep D/s's where the D has total control, etc, yet s considered them a sub; I have seen people with a relatively light D/s where they considered themselves a slave *shrug* Some will tell you unless it is a total TPE where the s has no control, literally have given the M total power to do anything to them/with them and the like that they are`not a slave. Some will argue that a sub has a need to serve but doesn't consider themselves property, rather that they are the willing servant of the other,whereas a slave has a need to be owned and controlled.....like I said, I personally think that it ia up the eye of the beholder, if a couple thinks they are M and s, or D and s, that is there business:). About the only place where that might have more strict meanings would be in the leather community, where those following a specific tradition might have more rigid definitions and protocols.
|